Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/649/10696

From The Socialist newspaper, 1 December 2010

What we think

Unity - but not unity of the graveyard

London anti-cuts demo organised by the RMT, FBU, PCS, NUT, National Shop Stewards Network and other unions, photo Suzanne Beishon

London anti-cuts demo organised by the RMT, FBU, PCS, NUT, National Shop Stewards Network and other unions, photo Suzanne Beishon   (Click to enlarge)

On 27 November 100,000 workers took to the streets in Ireland in a gigantic show of opposition to the cuts raining down on them.

Here too, the anti-cuts movement is intensifying. At this stage it is young people who have taken the lead with the magnificent students' strikes, but there is also growing determination among trade unionists to wage an intransigent struggle to defeat the government.

Every Saturday another town is brought to a standstill by an anti-cuts demonstration. From smaller towns to big cities the demonstrations have been the biggest since the early 1990s. Those demonstrations were part of the movement against the poll tax - which succeeded in both defeating the tax and bringing down the Iron Lady herself - Maggie Thatcher.

Today one of the key questions is how to bring together the different elements of the rapidly growing anti-cuts movement in order to create the most powerful possible opposition so that we can once again defeat the Tory government.

The National Shop Stewards Network (NSSN) anti-cuts conference, taking place on 22 January, has the potential to play an important role in this process. The anti-cuts movement inevitably has many different strands - housing campaigners, pensioners' organisations, disability rights campaigns and many more - which all have a potentially valuable role to play. Nonetheless, it is essential that they are linked together. The trade unions are best placed to do this. However, unfortunately right-wing trade union leaders only play lip service to this task. The NSSN, with a record of organising militant trade unionists, therefore has a crucial role to play - not in replacing the trade unions - but in acting as a lever to galvanise the struggle.

It has already shown how it can play this role. The NSSN was the first national organisation of the labour movement to organise a national conference in the wake of chancellor George Osborne's first emergency 'bloodbath budget'.

It then organised the lobby of the TUC conference which received a tremendous response from the growing anti-cuts movement. All activity - demos, meetings etc - to raise awareness is to be welcomed. But the NSSN correctly foresaw that exerting pressure on the leadership of our movement, the trade unions, was the first priority. This paid off when the TUC was forced to respond to the demand for a national demonstration - albeit belatedly for 26 March 2011.

The NSSN has continued the campaign of pressure on the trade unions to act, not least by building the anti-cuts movement on the ground. It has played a key role in founding many of the local anti-cuts unions and in instigating the regional trade union demonstrations against the cuts that took place on 23 October in London, Bristol, Cardiff, Manchester and elsewhere.

Socialist Party members who are officers of the NSSN are proposing that the conference in January 2011 founds the 'NSSN - all-Britain anti-cuts campaign' under the slogan 'Unions and communities together to save jobs and services'. This proposal will be discussed at the NSSN steering committee taking place on 4 December.

Opposition

Unfortunately but not surprisingly, it will be opposed by members of the Socialist Workers Party (SWP). When the anti-cuts conference was first agreed by the NSSN steering committee (which includes members of the SWP and the Coalition of Resistance) the SWP members voted for it, but then less than 24 hours later announced their own 'Right to Work' conference.

Yet the SWP are now opposing the NSSN conference under the cloak of 'unity'. However, we are not able to take at face value the declarations of the SWP for unity when their actions in practice have been so divisive.

When Chris Bambery of the SWP spoke on behalf of Right to Work at the Coalition of Resistance conference on Saturday 27 November he declared that: "we do not want different anti-cuts campaigns in the same town or city". We agree, but just a day later the SWP's party notes again re-emphasise the importance of building separate Right to Work groups in every local area! He also stated that: "we do not want demonstrations taking place at the same time". Again we agree, but it was his party that, just weeks ago, knowingly organised a national Unite Against Fascism demonstration on the same day, time and venue as Socialism 2010 - our 1,000 strong weekend of discussion and debate. As a result the UAF demonstration was far more poorly attended than it could have been.

An NSSN officer who is in the SWP comments on our proposal for 'NSSN - an all-Britain anti-cuts campaign' in the Socialist Worker (27 November 2010) saying: "At the moment no single organisation has any mandate or wide enough support to set itself up as the sole national organisation against the cuts. An attempt by the Socialist Party to railroad the NSSN into proclaiming itself as this national body is a recipe for division and disaster."

This is to deliberately misrepresent our position. The Socialist Party does not claim that the NSSN's anti-cuts campaign would be the only national organisation against the cuts. Given the existence of the Coalition of Resistance and Right to Work this is clearly not the case. We do, however, think that the NSSN - with its records, roots and fighting programme - is uniquely well placed to begin to bring together the forces that are building the anti-cuts movement on the ground.

We are in favour of the maximum unity and cooperation between the different anti-cuts organisations, and have proposed that the NSSN discusses coordination with the Coalition of Resistance (CoR) and Right to Work. However, unity only strengthens the movement if it is around a fighting programme. If we were all to unite around the programme of passivity put forward by Brendan Barber and the leadership of the TUC we would obviously be dooming our movement to defeat.

At the CoR conference Chris Bambery of the SWP declared that: "anyone who claims to be the leadership of the movement should be punished". Yet just a day later the SWP's party notes tell their members: "In every area SWP members need to not only be involved in local anti-cuts groups but also fighting to lead and shape them." That is the right of the SWP. No one can currently claim to be the sole leadership of the anti-cuts movement nationally, but every political trend involved in the anti-cuts movement can and should put forward and argue for their strategy for defeating the cuts.

Which strategy is most effective in defeating the cuts, and can therefore win the leadership of the movement, will be tested and decided in the living struggle. This is what happened in the anti-poll tax movement. It was the non-payment strategy of the Socialist Party (then called Militant) which was adopted by 18 million people and led to victory.

Unfortunately, at the CoR conference, there was no opportunity for genuine discussion and debate on how best to defeat the cuts. By contrast, the NSSN conference will be open and democratic with full rights for all trends to put forward their point view.

No strategy

The SWP do not have a strategy for victory. Recently this has been shown by their serious mistakes in the industrial field - both condemning the London FBU firefighters for suspending their strike action, and alienating BA strikers by occupying their talks. The SWP are combining ultra-leftism with increasing opportunism. The latter is indicated by the article by the NSSN officer. Their approach is to 'keep quiet' about cuts by Labour councils, in order to keep Labour Party members on board. This is a strategy for defeat. To build a united movement it is necessary to oppose all cuts in jobs and services, regardless of which party is wielding the axe.

The SWP's approach was shown by their coverage of the magnificent London NSSN-initiated anti-cuts march on 23 October, where they criticised the chair of the rally for asking Jeremy Corbyn MP to call on Labour councillors to oppose cuts, saying: "In order to build a broad alliance we need to defeat the Tory cuts, we will need to work not only with left wing Labour MPs like Corbyn, but with far more flawed figures on the right of the party." We agree that we should work with Labour Party members in the anti-cuts movement, including Labour councillors, provided they oppose the cuts. Where they vote for them, they cannot be part of the anti-cuts movement.

Electoral stand

The NSSN officer writing in Socialist Worker states that the Socialist Party's "proposal to support anti-cuts candidates is also very divisive. It will inevitably mean standing candidates against the Labour Party, and therefore will likely exclude any supporters from the left of Labour." It is open for debate whether the NSSN anti-cuts conference wants to formally adopt a position of standing anti-cuts candidates at this stage.

However, it is absolutely clear that a major part of the anti-cuts movement across the country is opposing the huge cuts being carried out by Labour councils whether it is workers taking strike action against 400 million worth of cuts from Kirklees Labour council or campaigners in Lewisham opposing 60 million of cuts by the Labour council in Lewisham - which this week called out the full might of the riot police against 200 peaceful anti-cuts protestors!

It is right and inevitable that - faced with candidates from the big three pro-cuts parties - anti-cuts campaigners - perhaps even including some who are currently Labour Party members - will want to stand anti-cuts campaigners in elections. To suggest that we do not do so for fear of 'excluding Labour supporters' is to try and take away an important political weapon in the struggle.

The Socialist Party will fight for unity - but for unity around a programme of action capable of defeating the Con-Dem axe men and women.


See also on this site: How can an anti-cuts movement be built? Coalition of Resistance conference report

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 1 December 2010:


Youth Fight for Education

Young people lead fight against cuts

We can win: student struggle must escalate


Socialist Party editorial

Unity - but not unity of the graveyard

How can an anti-cuts movement be built? Coalition of Resistance conference report


Anti-cuts campaign

Defend jobs and services

Riot police called to Lewisham town hall lobby

Irish working class in huge show of defiance

Fight against cuts continues to grow

Coventry council - stop job cuts

NHS walk-in centre saved, but campaign continues

News in brief


Anti-racism

Nuneaton protest against racist EDL


The Socialist Interview

Len McCluskey speaks to The Socialist: Building workers' confidence


Socialist Party workplace news

PCS: Vote 'yes' for action against cuts

London Underground strike most solid so far

Wales TUC leadership tries to stifle action to stop the cuts

A united battle for pensions

Workplace news in brief


International socialist news and analysis

North Korean artillery attack raises tensions

Portugal: 'Biggest strike action ever'


Climate change

Climate change: Socialist planning needed to avert a global catastrophe


Readers' comments

Our health - A market for big business

Bankers: The new untouchables?


 

Home   |   The Socialist 1 December 2010   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Cuts:

triangleBradford campaign to save children's services launched

triangleSouth London health bosses' cover-up

triangleTotnes MP uses coffin controversy to distract from brutal NHS cuts

triangleUni market 'failure', two-year degrees - end cuts, scrap fees!

triangleLabour 'purge' furore really just democracy

NSSN:

triangleUnite day of action against blacklisting

triangleNSSN meeting brings together workers in struggle

triangleBirmingham: NSSN Solidarity Forum

triangleFood processing workers vote for action against miserly bosses

SWP:

triangleAfter the Unite elections - now turn outwards

triangleTUSC: SWP suspends participation in England/Wales

triangleDebates on building the anti-Trump movement

Labour:

triangleArriva bus drivers' action wins pay rise

triangleBlairite council 'all ears' to rich property developers

Socialist Party:

triangleStop the rotten redevelopment plan, demand residents

Coalition of Resistance:

triangleThe NSSN, the anti-cuts struggle and the Trade Unions

National Shop Stewards Network:

triangleMixed-fleet workers show strikes get results

Socialist Workers Party:

triangleUnison attacks Barts deal after failing to ballot their members for strike action

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis

13/12/17

Labour

Labour 'purge' furore really just democracy

13/12/17

Brexit

Brexit deal no solution to Tory rifts

13/12/17

Housing

Two in five 'right to buy' homes now for let

13/12/17

NHS

Save our NHS

13/12/17

Them & Us

Them & Us

13/12/17

Fees

Uni market 'failure', two-year degrees - end cuts, scrap fees!

13/12/17

Retail

Retail sector crunch: nationalise to save jobs

8/12/17

Government

Local government pay: fight for the 5% claim, fully funded

6/12/17

Labour

Corbyn's Labour can defeat Tories with socialist programme

6/12/17

NHS

Branson sues NHS: kick out the profiteers

6/12/17

Immigration

Royal wedding exposes them-and-us visa system

6/12/17

Banks

RBS to sack 1,000: nationalise the banks

6/12/17

Homelessness

Rough sleeping crisis: make homes, not arrests

6/12/17

Poverty

End Tory war on poor

6/12/17

Rail

Nationalise rail now

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle16 Dec Arriva bus drivers' action wins pay rise

triangle16 Dec Blairite council 'all ears' to rich property developers

triangle14 Dec Stop the rotten redevelopment plan, demand residents

triangle13 Dec Six months on - still no justice for Grenfell

triangle13 Dec Movement growing against fracking giant Ineos

triangle13 Dec Totnes MP uses coffin controversy to distract from brutal NHS cuts

triangle13 Dec Trump's incendiary Jerusalem statement reignites Israeli-Palestinian...

More ...

triangle18 Dec Leeds Socialist Party: Religion and Socialism

triangle19 Dec Bristol North Socialist Party: Christmas social

triangle21 Dec Wakefield Socialist Party: Socialists and the National Question

triangle6 Jan Socialist Party national women's meeting

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2