Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/292/14011

From The Socialist newspaper, 21 March 2003

We Need A Political Voice

THE MOVEMENT against the war has revealed starkly the lack of a mainstream mass political party that represents the interests of the demonstrators.

If such a party existed, and was able to lead mass movements against the war and to challenge the rule of New Labour it would shift the balance of forces significantly in favour of the anti-war movement.

It is true that Charles Kennedy, leader of the Liberal Democrats, spoke at the last anti-war demo, but neither he nor his party are anti-war in the way that the vast majority of those that demonstrated on February 15 are anti-war. On Radio 4's World at One Kennedy made it clear that he would support British troops once a war starts.

Whilst as socialists we have every sympathy with ordinary soldiers who are being ordered to risk their lives in an unjust war, this is no excuse for ceasing to oppose the war once it has begun. This is typical of the Liberal Democrats on every issue - whilst they appear slightly to the left of New Labour in words - when they have been elected at local level they have carried out identical policies of cuts and privatisation.

In the days before New Labour, the Labour Party would have acted as the party of the anti-war movement to a large degree. Whilst it was capitalist and usually pro-war at the top, the membership was overwhelmingly working class and was able to exert pressure on the leadership through the party's democratic structures. As a result the Labour Party was never a wholly reliable tool for the capitalist class.

In the 1960s, for example, the US president Lyndon Johnson attempted to bully the British government into participating in the Vietnam war. The Labour prime minister Wilson, however, by no means a left-winger but sensitive to the consequences at home, the mass anti-war movement and its potential impact inside the trade unions and the Labour Party, refused to commit British troops.

Big business party

THE LABOUR Party today though, is completely different.

It has become another party of big business, no different in essence to the Tories. The current crisis in the Labour Party has raised the hopes of some that the Labour Party can be reclaimed from the Blairites.

It is true that 122 Labour MPs found their courage and voted against the government on the war. For the vast majority of them, this was as a result not of their own convictions, but feeling the pressure of the anti-war movement.

This is demonstrated by the difference between that and the Labour Party conference vote that took place in Glasgow on 15 February as tens of thousands demonstrated outside it, and over a million demonstrated in London.

The conference gave Blair a standing ovation. It was true that it was less enthusiastic than usual, but it took the hot breath of a mass movement to shake large sections of the Labour Party into actual opposition to Blair!

Now they have stirred, however, open opposition to Blair will probably continue. In all likelihood Blair's days as prime minister are numbered. However, the obstacles to the voice of ordinary working class people being heard in the Labour Party are immense.

The fact is that it was easier for Tory MPs to trigger a leadership election against Margaret Thatcher than it is for Labour MPs and party members to unseat Blair. Nominations for a leadership candidate not supported by 20% of the parliamentary party (83 MPs) are invalid and even then an election can only take place at the annual conference in October.

A recall, or special conference, is possible but it can only be convened by the NEC, the same body (not facing re-election until October 2004) that voted in January by 22 votes to 4 to support Blair's war policy.

And crucially, the transformation of Labour into New Labour has had its effect on how millions of working class people see the Labour Party. The reason for low turnout in elections is not, as the anti-war movement has demonstrated, apathy. It is because unprecedented numbers of people, according to the British Social Attitudes survey, now see no significant differences between the parties.

A mass alternative

HOWEVER, THE most politically aware layers of the working class - the tens of thousands of anti-war youth and workers, the trade unionists who are entering struggle - are not, in the vast majority of cases, interested in struggling to overcome the enormous hurdles necessary to transform New Labour.

On the contrary most have the same attitude as the 80% of FBU members who have decided to pull out of the political fund because of their contempt for New Labour.

If Blair goes it will be to save New Labour. He will almost certainly be replaced by another type of New Labour politician, probably Gordon Brown. It would be wrong to imagine that this will make a fundamental difference to New Labour.

If Blair was to go before the war was over, his replacement would not be able to take exactly the same position on the Iraq war.

This is not because of principles - Brown has willingly allocated 5 billion from government coffers to help bomb Iraq - but because of the mass movement against the war. It would therefore be a major victory for the anti-war movement.

On every other issue, probably including future wars, Brown will be essentially the same as Blair. It was Brown who said 'no government on earth' could meet the firefighters pay claim. Even on the issues where he has a different approach to Blair, it is not a 'left' position. For example, when asked why he opposed 'top up' fees he said that the universities would just fritter the money away on extra wages for their staff!

Therefore the anti-war movement has two major tasks ahead of it now.

To build the widest possible mass civil disobedience against the war, especially strike action.

But also, to campaign on a second front - to seize the time to begin to build a mass political alternative, a new workers' party, that would involve a large section of the anti-war movement, trade unionists and anti-capitalists and would take on the pro-war, anti-working-class policies of Blair and New Labour, and take forward the fight for a new socialist society, free from poverty, exploitation and war.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 21 March 2003:

The Horror Begins

Fair Pay for Firefighters

Where Next For The Anti-War Movement?

Worldwide Protests At Bush's War

School And College protest reports: School's Out!

Fight Against War - Fight For Socialism

Terrorism strengthens USA

The alternative to war

We Need A Political Voice


 

Home   |   The Socialist 21 March 2003   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

War:

triangleCaerphilly Socialist Party: Are we heading for an era of war?

triangleComprehensive account of bloody conflict

triangleKurdish referendum declared illegal

triangleOctober 1917 reviews: 'More bright than any heaven'

triangleRussia, October 1917: When workers took power

Tony Blair:

triangleLeft comic's take on politics will have you in tears

triangleFilm - Dennis Skinner: Nature of the Beast

triangleFrom Militant to the Socialist Party

triangle'From Militant to the Socialist Party' - new book now available

Labour:

triangleAnti-DOO lobby of Liverpool's transport committee

triangleBirmingham South East Socialist Party: Can the Labour Party be changed?

triangleBlairite horror and Labour's divisions graphically exposed

Anti-war:

triangleTories Out demo - Photos

triangleAttacks ratchet-up Syrian conflict and fuel tensions between powers

Labour Party:

triangleCorbyn's Labour can defeat Tories with socialist programme

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis

8/12/17

Government

Local government pay: fight for the 5% claim, fully funded

6/12/17

Labour

Corbyn's Labour can defeat Tories with socialist programme

6/12/17

NHS

Branson sues NHS: kick out the profiteers

6/12/17

Immigration

Royal wedding exposes them-and-us visa system

6/12/17

Banks

RBS to sack 1,000: nationalise the banks

6/12/17

Homelessness

Rough sleeping crisis: make homes, not arrests

6/12/17

Poverty

End Tory war on poor

6/12/17

Rail

Nationalise rail now

29/11/17

Them & Us

Them & us

29/11/17

Homes

Tory housing policy: build zilch, hike prices

29/11/17

Wages

Make the Tories history

29/11/17

Birmingham

Birmingham bin workers win!

29/11/17

British economy

Amber warning lights flash on British economy

23/11/17

Pay

After the budget - unions must launch pay fight

22/11/17

Climate change

Carbon dioxide hits 800,000-year high: end profit-driven pollution

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle8 Dec Local government pay: fight for the full 5% claim

triangle6 Dec Strikers rally in Liverpool

triangle6 Dec Corbyn's Labour can defeat Tories with socialist programme

triangle5 Dec Victory at Glenfield shows people power can save our NHS

triangle5 Dec Labour council Blairites deselected

triangle30 Nov Victory: Glenfield Children's Heart Centre saved!

triangle30 Nov Dramatic retelling of Grunwick strike

More ...

triangle11 Dec Leeds Socialist Party: Campaigning workshop

triangle11 Dec Bristol North Socialist Party: Christmas Quiz

triangle12 Dec Birmingham South East Socialist Party: Can the Labour Party be changed?

triangle12 Dec Liverpool Socialist Party: Fighting council cuts

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2