Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/731/15108
From The Socialist newspaper, 29 August 2012
Crisis services handed over to charity food banks
Many councils are preparing to invest in charity-run food banks because of expected demand for crisis services as a result of devastating welfare cuts. The Socialist has previously reported on the rapidly rising number of food banks in Britain - feeding people struggling to get by with rocketing food and energy prices along with pay freezes, job losses and benefit cuts. 128,697 families were given emergency food supplies by charity organisations last year.
It is an indictment of local councils that they are willing to simply direct more and more of their residents to these limited services rather than stand up and fight for the council to be able to not cut jobs and services and instead provide basic support. This is a letter sent to the Guardian newspaper on the issue:
Once again The Guardian repeats the line that 'councils will no longer be able to' fund another vital service, this time to maintain emergency crisis loans (Councils set to invest in charity-run food banks to help families in crisis, 22 August). It's not a case of can't, but won't.
Referring to Labour-controlled Lambeth you say that "it will not be able to afford cash loans - as happens now - because its social fund budget is being cut" when such spending is devolved to councils from next April. Instead, like other councils, they will fund food banks and other charities offering what your article acknowledges will be inadequate, stigmatising and unreliable US-style "low cost help in kind".
But why don't Labour councils declare now that they will spend what is needed on emergency crisis loans - and maintain existing levels of council tax benefit support for that matter - and present the bill for meeting the funding gap back to the government? That's what Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) councillors would do.
Labour in Westminster could help by pledging that an incoming government would reimburse councils if, for example, they were to use their reserves, or their prudential borrowing powers, to avoid these devastating cuts.
These are choices - and Labour is making the wrong one in not resisting the Con-Dems' rolling back of the welfare state.
Clive Heemskerk, Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition national nominating officer
Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.
In The Socialist 29 August 2012:
Socialist Party news and analysis
Paralympics, Atos scandal, Remploy closures... Con-Dems win gold for hypocrisy!
Build for a 24-hour general strike!
Crisis services handed over to charity food banks
Socialist Party workplace news
Building workers fight pay cut threat
Sparks protest at London Crown House site
Local government pension scheme
Sheffield recycling workers to resume strike action
Socialist Party reports and campaigns
Lobby the TUC for a 24-hour general strike
East Midlands: Save our ambulance service
NHS: Unions must defend national pay bargaining
TUSC councillor rejects Walsall cuts 'consultation'
Prisons
Prison work - £3 a day is exploitation for profit
Women's prisons - Con-Dems' 'reforms' mean cuts and privatisation
International socialist news and analysis
Norway: Mass murderer Anders Breivik gets life sentence
Kazakhstan: Human rights campaigner Vadim Kuramshin freed
Reviews and comments
Leon Trotsky: A revolutionary's life
Fight council tax benefit cuts
The 'madness' of building homes
Socialist Party news
Notting Hill carnival-goers support Lonmin miners
Why I joined the Socialist Party
Home | The Socialist 29 August 2012 | Join the Socialist Party
Join us today!
Printable version
