Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/459/1536

From The Socialist newspaper, 22 October 2006

Straw, the veil and racism

IN THE wake of the horrific 7/7 bombings last year, racist attacks increased by 600%, particularly against Muslims. Now, a year later, another increase in racism is occurring. Incidents have been reported in the press of Muslim women having their veils ripped from their faces as well as a general increase in hostility towards Muslims.

The catalyst for this was Jack Straw's comments on Muslim women who wear the niqab (a full veil covering the whole head apart from the eyes). His comments were supported by Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality. Following Straw's remarks a series of ministers have made similar remarks which will undoubtedly further increase racism.

Some commentators have defended Straw's comments by arguing he had a right to his opinion. As socialists, we support the right of everyone to raise criticism of others' beliefs, including their religious beliefs. Nonetheless, Straw was mistaken to raise the issue in the way that he did.

Given his position as an MP, who the women were going to for help, his request will have been interpreted as a demand by many. In addition, he is part of a government responsible for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and that in Britain has overseen increased repression, particularly of Muslims. Therefore the fact that he not only asked women to remove their veils, but wrote about it in the press, is inevitably seen by Muslims as an attack on their religion.

Complicated issue

The issue of the veil is complicated for Muslims, non-Muslims, and from the standpoint of socialists and the labour movement. Many people, including many Muslims, feel that the all-encompassing niqab is repressive to women. As socialists we stand for the right of women to choose what they wear without facing discrimination or repression as a result. This includes the right to wear the niqab in most circumstances.

Phil Woolas MP's comments were completely wrong, when he publicly called for the sacking of a classroom assistant for insisting on wearing the niqab in front of male members of staff, as was Blair's intervention supporting her suspension.

Nonetheless, the teaching of young children while wearing a niqab is a particular circumstance where the rights of the children must take precedence, so the wearing of a niqab might not be appropriate.

However, where a teacher or classroom assistant is willing to remove her niqab if no adult males are present, as appeared to be so in the case mentioned above, the school should attempt to accommodate her wishes without jeopardising the interests of the children concerned.

A very small minority of Muslim women in Britain wear the niqab and their reasons for doing so vary. Some are recent immigrants from countries where it is common. Others view it as a statement of solidarity with their religion; the number of young women in this category has increased markedly in the last few years, because they have felt their religion to be under attack. Jack Straw's comments will lead to more, not fewer, women choosing to wear the niqab in protest at New Labour's attitude.

There are other reasons why Muslim women wear the niqab. Some reluctantly accept it because then they are allowed greater freedom by their families to study and move freely outside the home. Others are horrified by the pressure that British society puts on young women to dress in a certain way (to wear skimpy clothes etc) and see the veil as a certain protection. Some are pressured into wearing it by their families.

As socialists, we stand just as much for the right of women to choose not to wear the headscarf or niqab as to choose to wear them. However, politicians coming out 'against' the niqab, or it being banned as is the case at Imperial University, will do nothing to assist those women who are wearing it not through choice, but due to family or societal pressure. On the contrary, a situation of heightened prejudice against Muslims will tend to force Muslim communities to turn inward and will make it more difficult, not easier, for women to stand up against oppression.

If the ban on the niqab becomes general in universities the result will be that women from families where it is considered a necessity will be prevented from attending university.

In any case, any attempt by the government to dress up their views on Muslim women as concern for women's rights is blatant hypocrisy when the effects of government policy on fundamental issues affecting women such as low pay, health care and domestic violence are considered.

Government agenda

It is not a coincidence that so many different government ministers are singing the same tune. However, the reason has far more to do with New Labour's slide in the polls, and the leadership ambitions of various New Labour politicians, than it does with how Muslim women dress or, as New Labour claim they are attempting, encouraging the Muslim community to 'root out the extremists in their midst'.

The current onslaught will do nothing to cut across what New Labour calls 'extremism'. The vast majority of Muslims in Britain completely oppose the profoundly mistaken methods of terrorism. However, there is a tiny but growing minority who are prepared to support, or even taken part in, terrible attacks like 7/7. Their numbers have grown, not as a result of the actions of the 'Muslim community,' but because of the profound anger and alienation they feel because of New Labour's wars of occupation and the increased discrimination they face here in Britain.

The latest ratcheting-up of racism by the government will only increase the anger and alienation felt by many young Muslims, and increase the size of the tiny minority willing to take the mistaken road of terrorism.

Traditionally, playing the race card was a tactic of the Tories - often under a Labour government. Now it is New Labour which is starting to accommodate itself to anti-Muslim prejudices - a dangerous game. Frightened of being undermined by the Tories and, in some areas by the far-right, they are echoing some of their sentiments.

The statements made, and the baying they have produced in the right-wing press, can only make it easier for far-right, racist organisations, like the British National Party, to gain support.

Socialists defend the rights of Muslims, and all ethnic minorities, against racism and attacks on their democratic and religious rights. At the same time we explain to the working class as a whole that it is not in their interests to allow New Labour to whip up racism and division. The attacks on democratic rights being introduced under the guise of 'fighting terror', including the latest sweeping assault on the rights of students, will be used in the future against the left and the workers' movement. Already anti-terror legislation has been used against peaceful anti-arms trade protesters.

Ruth Kelly, in charge of the Orwellian sounding 'Commission for Integration and Cohesion' has publicly stated that the government would only fund and engage with Muslim organisations that are, "taking a pro-active leadership role in tackling extremism and defending our shared values". But the majority of working-class people in Britain do not share New Labour's values.

New Labour 'values' include the brutal occupation of Iraq and a headlong rush to privatise public services. More than 70% of the population has different values - and opposes any further sell-off of public services.

New Labour is unpopular because it has carried out consistently pro-big business, anti-working class policies - a diet of cuts, privatisation and war. While attacking working-class people they disguise their policies by claiming that, as Blair put it, "we are all middle-class now". Straw even went so far as to suggest that religion rather than class is now the "great divide" in society.

In reality, social class remains the major division. The gap between rich and poor in Britain today is wider than at any time under Margaret Thatcher and Muslim workers are, on average, amongst the lowest-paid strata of the working class. Two-thirds of children from British families of Bangladeshi and Pakistani origin grow up in poverty.

The workers' movement has to stand against the prejudice being whipped up by New Labour at the same time as campaigning amongst Muslim workers for a united struggle against low pay and racism.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 22 October 2006:

March to save the NHS

The battle to defend the health service

Whitewashing New Labour's NHS policies


Socialist Party Marxist analysis

Straw, the veil and racism


Socialism 2006

socialism2006


War and terrorism

Troops out of Iraq

Iraq workers strike

North Korea's nuclear test ratchets up regional tensions

Iran and the nuclear bomb

Journalist's murder reveals brutality of Putin regime

Killing overshadows developing conflict between Russia and Georgia


Socialist Party review

The Communist Manifesto


Socialist Students

Build Socialist Students!

London Socialist Students

Fighting for socialist ideas


 

Home   |   The Socialist 22 October 2006   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Bookshop






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Racism:

triangleEast London Socialist Party: Stephen Lawrence; fighting racism

triangleDerby Socialist Party: Stephen Lawrence murder - How socialists and the community fought back against racism

triangleGreenwich Unite members oppose cuts, privatisation and racism

triangleStephen Lawrence murder - the untold story

triangleFighting racist attacks and the far-right

triangleShowing racism the red card

Veil:

triangleThe veil and Muslim women

Women:

triangleSalford Socialist Party: Women and the fight for socialism

triangleHarrogate Socialist Party: Women and the struggle for socialism

triangleTory policies hit women hardest

Muslim:

triangleEgypt in revolt

triangleEgypt: Mass revolt forces Mubarak regime to brink

triangleEgypt: Revolutionary masses move to overthrow Mubarak dictatorship

Far-right:

triangleLlanelli and West Wales Socialist Party: How to defeat the far-right

triangleStop the far-right EDL thugs

triangleOpposing the racist and hooligan EDL

Iraq:

triangleThem & Us

trianglePower and terror

triangleConsequences of 9/11: a world turned upside down

Jack Straw:

triangleInterview with POA leader Brian Caton

trianglePrison officers reject pay offer

trianglePrison officers fight Labour's strike ban

Discrimination:

trianglePride London

triangleFighting talk at TUC disability conference

triangleGay protest and discrimination

Invasion:

triangleAfghan war

triangleDemonstrate against war in Afghanistan

triangleAfghanistan: an unwinnable war

Afghanistan:

trianglePoppy mania for bosses...

trianglePicture slide show: Marking ten years since the invasion of Afghanistan

triangleAfghanistan: Withdraw the troops now!

Privatisation:

triangleSave the NHS!

triangleRemploy workers fight privatisation

triangleHMRC workers strike back against privatisation

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis

9/2/12

Pensions

NUT and PCS launch consultative surveys to build for ongoing pensions action

8/2/12

London

London - a tale of two cities

8/2/12

US

Them & Us

8/2/12

NHS

Save the NHS!

8/2/12

Welfare

Exploiting the unemployed to line the pockets of big business

8/2/12

Rail

Safe railways, not shopping malls

8/2/12

EMA

Students drop out of college without EMA

1/2/12

Bankers

Bankers bonus scandal - Fight this profit-mad system

1/2/12

Pensions

Pensions battle: Unions must campaign for coordinated strike action in March

1/2/12

Unison

Unison pensions cowardice

1/2/12

Pay

Them & Us

1/2/12

Labour

What is the point of Labour MPs?

1/2/12

Davos

Dead end in Davos

30/1/12

TUSC

Trade unionists and socialists prepare for May elections

25/1/12

Trade union

The trade unions and Labour

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...

 Latest Posts

triangle10 Feb The battle of Saltley Gates

N30 - Millions strike back at Con-Dem government on 30 November 2011, photo Paul Mattsson

triangle9 Feb NUT and PCS launch consultative surveys to build for ongoing pensions...

triangle9 Feb Jet tanker drivers force employers to negotiate

Hardest Hit Protest: Disabled people and their families protest in central London against government spending cuts, photo Paul Mattsson

triangle8 Feb London - a tale of two cities

triangle8 Feb Salford campaign saves day care centres

NHS demo London, May 2011 , photo Paul Mattsson

triangle8 Feb Save the NHS!

Picket line at Stagecoach,  Rotherham depot 8.2.12 , photo by Alistair Tice

triangle8 Feb Stagecoach South Yorkshire - management getting desperate

More ...

 What's On

triangle11 Feb Socialist Party national youth meeting

triangle13 Feb Manchester Socialist Party: Lenin's State and Revolution

triangle13 Feb Leeds City & Bradford Socialist Party: The crisis of capitalism in the eurozone and Britain

triangle13 Feb Aylesbury Socialist Party: What is Marxism?

triangle13 Feb Birmingham Socialist Party: Socialism and religion

triangle14 Feb Derby Socialist Party: China - Will the economic boom continue?

triangle14 Feb Hatfield Socialist Party: Trade unionists and socialists standing against the cuts

triangle14 Feb Bristol Central Socialist Party: The 1917 February revolution in Russia

triangle14 Feb Hyde Park & Headingley Socialist Party: Perspectives for Britain

triangle15 Feb Wakefield & Pontefract Socialist Party: Fighting the cuts - What's socialism got to do with it?

More ...

Categories

1-9 

1-9 


Select articles from month:

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

July 2003

December 2001

November 2001

October 2001

September 2001

August 2001

July 2001

June 2001

May 2001

April 2001

March 2001

February 2001

January 2001

December 2000

November 2000

October 2000

September 2000

August 2000

July 2000

June 2000

May 2000

April 2000

March 2000

February 2000

January 2000

December 1999