Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/16038
Southampton councillors have a choice ... Don't vote for cuts!
Southampton Socialist Party
Facing the worst council cuts ever, with the loss of over 300 jobs and vital services, Southampton Socialist Party put forward concrete proposals to the council's budget consultation process to set a No Cuts budget to protect all jobs and services as part of a mass campaign to force increased funding from the Con-Dem government.
This proposal was based on utilising council borrowing powers funded by cash in the council's reserves.
The council has now circulated a document written by chief financial officer (CFO) Andy Lowe, refuting this proposal.
Southampton Socialist Party does not accept the legal arguments of the CFO. They only represent one interpretation of the legislation from the Local Government Act 2003.
In fact, rather than contradicting our proposals, we believe the Act, and the experiences of council borrowing since 2003, give avenues Southampton council must test to the full in fighting to defend the city from the draconian Con-Dem cuts.
As the Local Government Act asserts, "A local authority may borrow money - (a) for any purpose relevant to its functions under any enactment, or (b) for the purposes of the prudent management of its financial affairs". Can there be any doubt given the cuts the city faces that our proposal meets this requirement?
The CFO actually accepts that councils can borrow, even without government permission. He could hardly do otherwise when out of Southampton council's General Fund borrowing (for non-housing expenditure) of £79.9 million in 2011-12, £22.9 million was 'unsupported' by government grants.
He then says, however, that borrowing should only be for 'capital expenditure' as opposed to day-to-day 'revenue' spending, but that is not the whole truth.
The Audit Commission, the government's spending watch-dog, admitted recently that 16% of unitary local authorities submitted 'capitalisation requests' in 2012 to allow them, in the Commission's words, "to treat revenue expenditure as capital expenditure and therefore either borrow or use capital receipts to finance" it. There are other routes as well.
What is ultimately deemed to be an 'acceptable budget' will be decided not by the views of council officials and their legal advisors alone, or even Eric Pickles, the Conservative minister for Local Government, but the determination of those councillors committed to opposing the cuts and the mass support they can build for such a stand.
And can there be any doubt they would receive such support? Whilst the eight official consultation meetings in the city attracted just one hundred people, the overwhelming view was of opposition and concern at the impact the cuts would have.
Elsewhere public consultations have been held by the community themselves and have been well attended.
Over 200 attended the meeting for Oaklands Pool and the same number at Newtown Youth Centre. Over 70 attended one at Woolston Youth Centre recently.
Unanimously these meetings have called on the council not to implement the cuts. Over 1,500 signatures have been collected in support of Oaklands Pool, over 2,000 signatures in support of Southampton Youth Services.
Most significantly, the stand of Keith Morrell and Don Thomas to vote against cuts and support such a fight has galvanised others to agree that such a campaign could be fought and won.
Keith and Don have received overwhelming support in their Coxford ward and backing from Len McCluskey, Unite union general secretary, and also from the RMT union.
Alongside this they have received the support of Southampton council workers, their trade unions, and other union branches, activists and anti-cuts campaigners across the country.
Meanwhile the Con-Dem government's austerity agenda unravels by the day and faces growing opposition nationally.
Committed to cuts as a way of reducing government borrowing, this week's figures show the government is borrowing more than it did last year! As the impact of the cuts is felt, support for the government is falling.
Recognising the horror these cuts will bring, leaders of three Labour councils - Newcastle, Liverpool and Sheffield - wrote a joint statement over Christmas begging the government to change tack because "forces of social unrest are starting to smoulder".
If any council dared to defy the government it would become a beacon to the whole country given the scale of the cuts today. Millions would flock to take part in a mass campaign in support of the council.
Southampton Labour council and its two Labour MPs, Alan Whitehead and John Denham, could easily demand that Labour should promise, when next in government, to write off the debts of any councils that borrow in order to avoid cuts.
So Labour councillors do have a choice. Surely they must all ensure no stone is left unturned in fighting to defend the city from such cruel Con-Dem cuts.
We call on them to show some steel and leadership and refuse to implement the Con-Dem cuts!
Join the Fight - Join the Socialists!
Southampton Socialist Party has consistently campaigned against all cuts. Through our work we have ensured St Mary's Leisure Centre, Bitterne NHS Walk-In Centre and Crowlin House remain open. Fight the cuts and join the fight for socialism!
For more information contact Nick Chaffey on 07833 681910 or email email@example.com
Save Jobs & Services - Don't Vote for Cuts
Demonstrate Wednesday 13 February, 1pm
Civic Centre, Southampton
This version of this article was first posted on the Socialist Party website on 25 January 2013 and may vary slightly from the version subsequently printed in The Socialist.