Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/796/18062

From The Socialist newspaper, 29 January 2014

Debate on the environment

The European Union Framework for climate and energy conference recently agreed, after much wrangling, only a timid response to the threat of climate change.

Their resolution merely hoped for a 40% cut in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2030 and to produce just over a quarter of Europe's energy by renewable sources.

The capitalist class and their profit-driven system cannot produce an environmentally friendly energy system and will probably obstruct even these timorous plans. The working class movement has to work out an alternative.

In this feature, as a contribution to this debate, Blair Smillie and Pete Dickenson discuss whether clean coal and carbon capture and storage (CCS) can play any role.


Don't ignore carbon capture and storage

Blair Smillie

As the great grandson of Robert Smillie, the great miners' union leader from 1912/22, I wonder what he would feel like if he could see the destruction of an industry which once fuelled the country through two world wars, and with the miners' dependents, represented 13% of the UK population.

He may wonder why, with over 1,000 coal plants planned throughout the world, we are not exploiting the reserves of coal in this country which are proven to be able to supply us for the next 200 to 300 years.

He may agree with scientists that CO2 (carbon dioxide) helps to create global warming and indeed he would also be backing the need for efficient carbon capture and storage (CCS).

I think he would be terrified of nuclear which is supposed to be 'clean' yet the spent uranium will hold grave danger to the world for 500,000 years.

I am sure he would not agree with windmills spoiling our coasts and countryside, unless, and I repeat, unless they were cost-effective and efficient. So that brings us back to two words 'coal' and 'miners'

These two words scare the devil out of politicians. It is well seen why they're intent on not discussing the issue of CCS and the possibility that reopening our coal mines and employing thousands of men and in turn reviving our mining communities.

No it is easier for them to ignore the fact that although the Don Valley CCS project in South Yorkshire was seen by Europe as our 'best hope' to fuel our country at much lower cost than nuclear and renewable energy, it still involved keeping our pits open.

Imported dangers

Let's then look at the danger we face as a country reliant on imports of coal and uranium:

Uranium is now becoming much harder to find. They're having to go deeper to source supply for an ever increasing world market.

Coal is presently imported from Russia, Columbia, USA and even South Africa. Have any of our politicians been down a South African or Russian mine? I very much doubt it and if they had been they would see the horrendous conditions which these people have to work in.

Why do you think it is cheaper to ship coal half way across the world with the resultant waste of energy? It wouldn't be so bad if they chose to build their ships here and they help to save our ship building industry!

We do not control the pricing and as the suppliers are capitalists, the knowledge that we have closed down the access to our own coal, will no doubt trigger price rises.

The development of China and India with their planned 750-plus coal powered plants under construction, are we going to have priority, no I don't think so.

We need to build our mining industry again where the creation of jobs is paramount. We need to work to develop ways to make using coal in the energy market safer for our country and then we need to export that technology throughout the world.

The only way forward is clear, well-informed discussion about energy and the way ahead, I always remember the last paragraph in Robert Smillie's book My Life for Labour published in 1924.

It was: "By far the struggle in life is greater than the successes." There will be an energy crisis in the future.

Now is the time, when the mining industry is hanging by a thread, to struggle to breathe new life into it for the sake of our children and grandchildren.


Jobs, safety and the environment are the big issues

Pete Dickenson

Blair Smillie's letter makes some useful points about how capitalist energy markets operate against workers' and consumers' interests.

Quite correctly, he points out that carbon capture and storage (CCS) could have the potential to be part of a green energy strategy.

I certainly hope that Robert Smillie would have agreed that carbon dioxide causes global warming because the evidence is now overwhelming.

I also agree that the dangers of nuclear power are terrifying, but I don't think windmills are undesirable as an eyesore.

The often justifiable complaints from local communities could largely be resolved by building wind farms off-shore; in my opinion these developments, such as the one off the Kent coast, are not a great blot on the seascape.

Some may disagree, but I think it is an acceptable price to pay to tackle global warming.

There are safety issues to be resolved before CCS could be adopted, but even if these were sorted out, I cannot agree that 'clean coal' should be at the centre of a green energy programme.

At most, it could play a useful auxiliary role in British climatic conditions. In countries where the weather is favourable to using solar power for example, I cannot see any justification for adopting clean coal.

And it looks as though there is no chance that CCS will be introduced anyway. As a result of the age of austerity, Cameron's rhetoric has moved from 'vote blue to go green' to 'dump the green crap'.

No obligation

The government still supports CCS in theory, but the energy bill being debated in Parliament only has the proviso that at some unspecified future point, coal plants must be able to demonstrate that carbon capture and storage technology could theoretically reduce their emissions by some unspecified amount.

In other words, generating companies will effectively have no obligation to spend any money on CCS when they build new coal-fired power stations.

I do not necessarily agree that CCS is cheaper than renewables - it is very difficult in capitalist economic terms to be precise about the cost of a technology such as CCS not yet developed and implemented, in a constantly changing and anarchic market.

It is probably true though that CCS would be cheaper than nuclear once the huge hidden and open subsidies for that industry are excluded.

The capitalists will go for the cheapest option where they can, but they also have political considerations.

As Blair Smillie's article implies, the ruling class is wary of developing the coal industry for political reasons linked to the mineworkers' historic role in the class struggle.

This is why the government chooses to import large amounts of cheap coal rather than develop a local coal industry.

For the bosses, profit will ultimately come first, but for the labour movement jobs, safety and the environment are key issues.

With CCS, there are real safety issues associated with storing carbon dioxide for an indefinite period in the future.

Several years ago in central Africa, CO2 escaped from the bottom of a lake due to natural causes and because the gas is heavier than air, it rolled across the surrounding area suffocating thousands of people.

As stored CO2 builds up, as a result of CCS, a way will have to be found to keep it safely. It will never be possible to release it, because to do so would recreate the problem of global warming.

More research

This issue needs to be fixed through more research before CCS should be used, especially since tried, tested and safe forms of renewable energy already exist. The main renewable resource in Britain is wind power.

People often ask what will happen when the wind stops blowing? This is where CCS could play a role, in providing back-up power for the relatively rare occasions in the UK when there is insufficient wind.

Whether CCS is eventually used should be based primarily on a consideration of environmental and safety issues, which is very unlikely to happen with our present profit-based system.

Only when power is taken out of the hands of the capitalists by a workers' government will it be possible to resolve this issue in the long-term interests of society.


Planning for the Planet

How Socialism Could Save the Environment

by Pete Dickenson

£10 including p&p

Special offer to readers of the Socialist

Available from Socialist Books

PO Box 24697, London E11 1YD

020 8988 8789

www.leftbooks.co.uk

bookshop@socialistparty.org.uk

Please make cheques payable to Socialist Books

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 29 January 2014:


Socialist Party news and analysis

Recovery? More Tory Lies!

Brighton Green referendum offers no alternative to cuts

Landlords, the real beneficiaries of benefits street

Them and Us


International socialist news and analysis

Davos: World capitalism means increased inequality

New mineworkers' strikes in South Africa


Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition

We need councillors who stand up for us

Plymouth TUSC plans for 2014 elections


Stop London Underground cuts

Support the tube workers' strikes

Determined strikes can stop London Underground in its tracks


Socialist Party workplace news

University workers continue strike action over pay

Land Registry threatened with sell-off

PCS leadership elections

NUT activists meet to push for action

NSSN launched in south of England

Workplace news in brief


The Socialist readers' comments

Debate on the environment

A waste of a Friday evening


Fight all cuts!

Derbyshire: 'Old Labour' cuts hurt just as much

Carmarthenshire council rats

Spelthorne residents demand fire cuts are stopped

Leeds Labour breaks bedroom tax promise


Socialist Party reports and campaigns

Bakers union launches fast food rights campaign

Socialist Party Northern region conference


 

Home   |   The Socialist 29 January 2014   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   PDF  |   ebook






Related links:

Environment:

triangleHackney Socialist Party: How can the environment be saved?

triangleTories 'flouting duty' on poison air, says UN

triangleExtreme weather events and global warming

triangleHurricane Harvey: A tragedy made far worse by capitalism

triangleTransport strategy: London's mayor is no visionary

Carbon:

triangle47,000 kids exposed to illegal toxic air

triangleUN climate change summit: more hot air from Marrakech

triangleHinkley Point C: wasteful, dangerous and polluting

Energy:

triangleCorbyn's manifesto: An important step in the right direction

triangleTories out! Corbyn can win with socialist policies

triangleTheatre review: Fracked! Political satire skewers frackers

Global warming:

triangleTrump and the fossil fuel corporations - a lethal combination for the planet

triangleVictory at Standing Rock: US authorities agree to re-route oil pipeline

Global:

triangleGlobal finance: Are those storm clouds ahead?

Climate change:

triangleYoung people are searching for an alternative - find it at Socialism 2017

Reviews and comments

Reviews and comments

18/10/17

Port Talbot

Powerful picture of the Port Talbot steel workers' struggle

18/10/17

Russian revolution

October 1917 reviews: 'More bright than any heaven'

11/10/17

Theresa May

Theresa May, Frida Kahlo and turning women into wares

11/10/17

Docks

Poverty, repression and fightback on the docks

11/10/17

The Socialist

The Socialist Inbox

11/10/17

TV

Shocking insight into Isis

2/10/17

Sexism

Hugh Hefner's exploitation of women

27/9/17

Football

Women's football - Sampson allegations

20/9/17

Letters

The Socialist Inbox

20/9/17

Socialist

Interview: the "socialist John Le Carré"

20/9/17

Women

Refreshing, anticapitalist - but little pointing a way forward

13/9/17

Women

New documentary asks women how their bodies are sexualised and policed

13/9/17

Letters

The Socialist inbox

13/9/17

Che Guevara

Intimate insight into a revolutionary icon

6/9/17

Pensions

Bosses' pensions robbery

triangleMore Reviews and comments articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle13 Oct The end of the Tories?

triangle11 Oct Nasty party imploding...drive out the Tories

triangle11 Oct CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

triangle11 Oct The fight against racial discrimination is tied to fighting against...

triangle11 Oct Catalonia: Workers can finish what Puigdemont won't

triangle6 Oct Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

triangle4 Oct The nasty party turns on itself... but the Tories must be driven out

More ...

triangle18 Oct Warrington & St Helens Socialist Party: 1917-2017; the October Russian Revolution

triangle18 Oct Hackney Socialist Party: 100 years ago - the Bolshevik-led revolution

triangle18 Oct Tower Hamlets Socialist Party: Capitalism in Crisis - is Corbyn the answer?

triangle19 Oct Waltham Forest Young Socialists: Deaths in police custody

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2