Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/470/1969

From The Socialist newspaper, 18 January 2007

The veil and Muslim women

The Veil - Picture, Paul Mattsson

THE VEIL controversy sparked by the comments of British ex-Foreign Minister and leader of House of Commons, Jack Straw, is not confined to the West but also affects countries with a majority Muslim population.

Rukhsana Manzoor, Socialist Movement Pakistan (SMP), Lahore

This debate is mainly focused on Muslim communities living in Europe. But very few things have been said about Muslim women of the so-called Islamic countries.

In recent years, especially after 9/11, right-wing political leaders in the West have used this issue to muster political support from more reactionary sections of the population. On the other hand the Islamic Mullahs use this issue to get support from the most right-wing section of the Muslim population.

Both the political right and religious right are using this issue for their own interests. One forces women to remove the veil, while the other wants to force the women to wear the veil.

Socialists oppose both approaches: for us it is the right of every woman to wear or not to wear the veil. The state and the religious right have no right to interfere in the personal lives of individuals. Every woman has the right to choose.

Is the veil custom or religion?

THERE IS lot of confusion around the veil about whether it is custom to wear it or a religious obligation according to Islamic teachings. The Islamic fundamentalists and illiterate Mullahs argue that the veil is a must for Muslim women as a religious duty. They argue that face showing of a woman in public is un-Islamic.

These are completely wrong arguments, because the veil is not an Islamic tradition or a religious obligation.

The veil predates Islam. The veil, as an article of clothing that covers parts of the head or face, was first worn more than 5,000 years ago. According to Dr Muazzez Cig, a well-known Turkish archaeologist specializing in ancient Sumerian civilization, "veils were first used by Sumerian temple priestesses whose job it was to initiate young men into the world of sex".

In the 13th century BC, Assyrian kings had "introduced both the seclusion of women in the royal harem and the veil". In pre-Islamic Persia, there is recorded evidence of veiled women (especially those married to wealthy individuals). In pre-Islamic Arabia, the veil was worn to protect the face from sand-laden desert winds.

In Judaism, as well as Christianity, the veil was once associated with modesty and property (the definition of both modesty and property changes over time).

In India, some 2,000 years ago, a few Hindu tribes started using the veil to save the "modesty" and "honour" of their women. Indian Rajputes, a Hindu tribe, still strictly enforces the veil and the complete segregation of female members. It is a historic fact that the veil is a custom and not a religious obligation. This is a centuries' old tribal and feudal tradition which now has become a part of religion.

There was no specific dress code during the period of the Prophet of Islam. The founder of Islam never required Muslim women to cover themselves up in an Afghan or Saudi style head-to-toe burqa or any of the burqa's offshoots.

From 632AD to 661AD, Islam spread to Basra, Syria, Bahrain, Oman, Yemen, Egypt, Jerusalem, Algeria, Libya, Morroco, Sudan, Cyprus and Tunisia, and still there was no dress code for Muslim women. As Islam spread outside its place of birth, some early Muslims adopted regional practices including veiling.

During both the Umayyad and Abbasid Dynasties (during this period feudal relations were fully established), a period of almost 600 years, only a part of Muslim urban classes opted for veiling, seclusion or both - mostly as a status symbol depicting that the women of the family did not need work in order to make both ends meet. All through Islamic history, rural and nomadic Muslim women, a majority among Muslim women, did not take to veiling.

Wahabism

IN THE mid-1700s, Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahab, an Arab theologian, set out to 'purify Islam' in his own colours. His principal thrust was his belief that Muslims had "misunderstood Islam for centuries".

Muhammad Ibn Abd al Wahab and Muhammad Ibn Saud agreed to rule by dividing Islamic interpretation and political administration between the two of them, respectively. From then on, Saudi Arabia's political rulers have been from House of Ibn Saud while the Grand Mufties (religious clerics which have the 'right' to interpret the religion) from the House of Ibn Wahab.

Saudi rulers and Grand Muftis have spent billions of dollars to spread the teachings of Ibn Wahab in Muslim societies (that includes severe discrimination of women in education, employment and the justice system). Saudi women are not allowed to drive and religious police enforce a strict dress code - face veil, headscarf and full black cloak. All customs, nothing to do with religion.

By the second half of the 19th century, some Muslim intellectuals argued that interpretations of the Quran in regards to polygamy and wearing the veil had nothing to do with Islam.

In 1923 Turkish intellectuals began to denounce the veil. The same year, there was public unveiling in Lebanon, Syria and Tunisia. Reza Pahlvi issued a proclamation (Iran 1925-1941) banning the veil. On 3 November 2006, the Chief Justice of Peshawar High Court banned women lawyers from wearing the veil.

The veil was not an issue in the 1960s and 1970s but became one in the 1980s and 1990s. The question of the veil has come back with the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, which is a reactionary phenomenon. It is still the case that a majority of 700 million Muslim women do not wear a full-face veil.

Are women free to choose?

MUSLIM WOMEN in many Muslim societies are not free to make a choice to wear or not wear the veil. The majority of veil-wearing women in Pakistan do not make a decision to wear the veil. On the contrary their male family members make decisions in this regard.

In conservative families, girls start to wear the veil from a very young age as tradition and custom. Even small girls of six or seven years' old start to wear the veil, and this is decided by the family, and not by the girl. Women are forced to wear a veil on the basis of religion, tradition and custom of the family. For many women, the veil is a precondition to allow them to go out of the home.

In Iran, Saudi Arabia and some other countries, state laws force women to wear a specific dress. It is not a choice but a compulsion. In many areas, it is not a state law but local religious clerics force women to wear the veil. For them, every woman without a veil or burqa is not modest and is like a prostitute. They regard the veil as a sign of modesty, honour and nobility of the family. So women are not free to make a choice.

This discussion is between men on what a woman should wear and what they should not wear. Both male politicians and religious clerics are men dictating to women.

Is it the key issue faced by women?

THE MEDIA, politicians and religious leaders try to give the impression that it is the key issue faced by women. There are millions of women in the Muslim societies around the world, who cannot cover their bodies because of poverty and hunger.

Millions of women are living in abject poverty, hunger, exploitation and repression because of the rotten and reactionary capitalist and feudal system. The key issue for these women is not the veil but to get rid of this exploitation and horrific conditions.

This issue like some others is an effort by the right-wing ruling class and religious right to divert the attention of the masses from the real issues.

The issues - like domestic violence, social, political and economic discrimination, unemployment, poverty, hunger, education, health and gender discrimination - are the main problems faced by the both veiled and non-veiled poor working-class women.

On the one hand, poor women face capitalist exploitation and, on the other, the feudal and tribal culture, traditions and customs are making their lives miserable. The main issue is to fight against these horrific conditions to change them.

This article was first produced in the Socialist, monthly newspaper of the Socialist Movement Pakistan (SMP).
See also Straw, The veil and racism, issue 459 the socialist, available on www.socialistparty.org.uk

Muslims under siege

A Socialist Party pamphlet

£2 including postage available from Socialist Publications Ltd. PO Box 24697, London E11 1YD 020 8988 8796

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 18 January 2007:

Labour ministers make us sick!

Keep up the pressure for 3 March demo


Socialist Students

Anger against top-up fees grows


War and terrorism

Iraq: Bush continues his dangerous blunder

Blair's vision: 'wars without end'

The Trial of Tony Blair


International socialist news and analysis

"We're moving towards a socialist republic of Venezuela" - Hugo Chávez

The veil and Muslim women

Sri Lanka: Urgent action needed

Fighting for a socialist world


Socialist Party news and analysis

Interest rate hike pushes up costs

Academies myths

What's behind the school leaving proposals?

Campaign for a new workers' party


Socialist Party workplace news

PCS stands firm on pensions

Fight the government's sell-off plans

Strike ballot put on hold once again

Re-instate Unique workers!

British Airways pensions

Fujitsu workers strike

'Single status' battle in Manchester

UNISON NEC elections


 

Home   |   The Socialist 18 January 2007   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Bookshop






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Muslim women:

triangleStraw, the veil and racism

Muslim:

triangleSarkozy instigates ban on veil to boost his political ratings

triangleEgypt in revolt

triangleEgypt: Mass revolt forces Mubarak regime to brink

triangleEgypt: Revolutionary masses move to overthrow Mubarak dictatorship

Islamic:

triangleTunisia: Elections mask the growing anger from below

triangleEDL attend anti-racist meeting

triangleIran 1979: A revolution that was taken from the working class

Islam:

triangleNorway: right wing terrorist killings

triangleProtesters cleared

triangleMalcolm X: "They called me the angriest Negro in America"

Religion:

triangleWirral & Chester Socialist Party: Socialism and religion

triangleBirmingham Socialist Party: Socialism and religion

triangleThe Greatest Show on Earth: The evidence for Evolution

Dress:

triangleWedgwood Potteries Closure

Discrimination:

triangleExposed: the dirty world of NHS privatisation

triangleEquality and Human Rights workers strike

triangleWomen: sick of sexism, discrimination and cuts?

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

25/5/12

Berkshire

'Save Heatherwood Hospital' campaign yielding results

25/5/12

Eastbourne

Strike at Sussex Downs College

25/5/12

Salford

Demo against cuts at Salford university

23/5/12

Disability

Disabled people's organisations condemn views of Tory minister IDS

23/5/12

Unemployed

Back to work? How the system fails the unemployed

23/5/12

Tyne and Wear

AEI Cables: "Thrown out in disgraceful circumstances"

23/5/12

Education

Our education under attack

23/5/12

Police

More attacks on right to campaign

23/5/12

Academies

Lincolnshire academies in crisis

23/5/12

National Shop Stewards Network

National Shop Stewards Network

23/5/12

CWU

Leadership shows weakness at CWU conference

23/5/12

RMT

Interview with RMT assistant general secretary candidate

23/5/12

Housing

The housing crisis - action needed now

23/5/12

Tamil Solidarity

Mullivaikal 2012 - Solidarity with the Tamil people

23/5/12

Dockers

Workplace news in brief

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...

triangle23 May Disabled people's organisations condemn views of Tory minister IDS

Greek workers protest outside parliament

triangle23 May We stand 100% with the Greek workers

Mass boycott of the household tax in Ireland, photo by Socialist Party Ireland

triangle23 May Ireland: 31 May referendum

March to save the NHS, 17 May 2011 , photo Paul Mattsson

triangle23 May Hospital jobs scandal - Action now to save the NHS!

Come to National Shop Stewards Network Conference 2012

triangle22 May Come to the 6th annual NSSN conference!

Chester Library protest - 12th May 2012, photo by Anna Vickery

triangle17 May Council workers in Cheshire strike against attacks on pay

Unite members at St Thomas' Hospital on strike 10 May 2012 as part of the nationwide strike of workers in the public sector against attacks on pensions , photo Paul Mattsson

triangle16 May It's our NHS - Let's fight for it!

More ...

triangle29 May Bristol Socialist Party: The Surveillance State

triangle29 May Leeds North West Socialist Party: Greece and the Eurozone crisis

triangle30 May Salford Socialist Party: Campaign Kazakhstan

More ...

Archive

Categories

1-9 

1-9 


Select articles from month:

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

July 2003

June 2003

May 2003

April 2003

March 2003

December 2001

November 2001

October 2001

September 2001

August 2001

July 2001

June 2001

May 2001

April 2001

March 2001

February 2001

January 2001

December 2000

November 2000

October 2000

September 2000

August 2000

July 2000

June 2000

May 2000

April 2000

March 2000

February 2000

January 2000

December 1999