Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/287/20247

From The Socialist newspaper, 14 February 2003

Anti-war news

Union Leaders Call For Action

THE LEADERS of five trade unions want trade union action to oppose this war. Paul Mackney of college lecturers' union Natfhe; Billy Hayes of Communication Workers' Union CWU; Mark Serwotka of civil service union PCS; Bob Crow of rail workers' union RMT and Mick Rix of train drivers' union Aslef demand a recall TUC Congress to discuss the proposed attack.

As Paul Mackney said: "The TUC is bound under its rules to recall the Congress if there is a danger of war. We are calling on the TUC to act on this rule now."

Rule 8 (K) says: "In order that the trade union movement may do everything which lies in its power to prevent future wars, the General Council shall, in the event of there being a danger of an outbreak of war, call a special Congress to decide on industrial action, such Congress to be called if possible, before war is declared."

Paul Mackney suggested that a declaration of war could trigger massive protests in every industry against it within hours.

Rail workers in Motherwell have shown the way by refusing to drive trains with military equipment headed for Iraq. International Socialist Resistance (ISR) is organising school and college strikes and protests for Day X, when war is declared.

Socialists and anti-war activists in the trade unions should organise for similar decisive action in the workplace on this vital issue.

Weapons of mass destruction

"DODGY TAPES, grainy videos, great rhetoric, but where's the proof Colin? - Not Enough", screamed the Daily Mirror headline.

Dave Carr

Its verdict on US secretary of state Colin Powell's dossier of 'incontrovertible' evidence of Iraq's possession of 'weapons of mass destruction', matches the scepticism of most people.

It now emerges that part of Powell's evidence, supposedly drawn up by British spies, is in fact part of a student's thesis published on the internet last September and dealing with the situation in Iraq twelve years ago!

According to the Royal United Services Institute, the British government's dossier "appears to be obsolete academic analysis dressed up as the best MI6 and our other international partners can produce on Saddam. The word 'scandalous' is, I think, greatly overused in our political life but it certainly applies to this."

Few doubt that Saddam Hussein's dictatorship has deadly weapons - which sizeable nation doesn't? But it's clear from the UN weapons inspectors, both up to 1998 and now, that Saddam is far weaker militarily than in 1990 when his troops invaded Kuwait. The subsequent destruction of the bulk of the Iraqi armed forces then didn't result in the use of his chemical and biological stockpiles.

However, many Iraqis and indeed many coalition troops have since succumbed to cancers and other diseases associated with toxic depleted uranium used in US artillery shells during that war.

Moreover, even George Bush and Tony Blair concede that Iraq does not have nuclear weapons.

But whereas Iraq faces obliteration from the US and its allies, North Korea - which does possess such weapons and is building more in flagrant disregard of international treaties and has threatened a pre-emptive nuclear strike if the US deploys more troops to South Korea - is, according to Powell, being engaged 'politically and diplomatically'.

A clear and unambiguous case of mass hypocrisy!

NATO's divisions open up

AHEAD OF Hans Blix delivering his crucial UN weapons inspectors report, huge divisions have opened up between the US administration (backed by Tony Blair) and France and Germany (backed by Russia).

Attending a conference on International Security in Munich last weekend - as over 20,000 anti-war demonstrators protested outside - US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld's arguments inside the hall were unceremoniously rubbished by Germany's foreign minister, Joschka Fischer.

The French and German governments, with one eye on public opinion and another on maintaining their own strategic interests with Middle Eastern regimes, have countered the US's war drive with a 'peace plan' to allow UN inspectors 'more time'.

US exasperation over "old Europe" compounded George Bush's earlier anger over France, Germany and Belgium's objection as NATO members to allow US missiles to be deployed in Turkey - a front-line country.

This Franco-German peace plan talks of extending no-fly zones to cover the whole of Iraq and deploying UN troops across the country to stop suspicious transports. Whether this UN 'occupation' would be acceptable to Saddam's beleaguered regime is debatable.

But US secretary of state Colin Powell dismissed the plan as a "distraction, not a solution". Powell has also made it clear that if Blix's report so much as hints at any "non-cooperation" by Saddam then the US will press for war.

The US would prefer to have the fig-leaf of the UN to legitimise their imperialist aggression, but they are prepared to act without it. With or without UN backing, however, this will be a war for profits and prestige and should be opposed.

If Bush wins a war, what happens next?

BUSH'S GOVERNMENT and military establishment are fighting a war for power, prestige and oil profits. They are already discussing how they can rule Iraq when they win.

At first they had thought in terms of a long occupation like that of Japan from 1945 to 1951. But US imperialism worries that following the pattern of this so-called 'reconstruction' under General MacArthur (who was given great powers, and was answerable to the US President and no-one else) would be seen as too brashly colonial and would cause resentment in the Arab world.

Now they envisage a shorter spell of military rule lasting from six to 18 months. Then they hope to set up an interim civilian administration, which would involve fewer troops.

If they negotiated the first two steps as easily as they hope, their planned next stage would be to establish a pro-US government in Iraq. In truth this would be at best a puppet regime - disarmed, neutered and ready to be sucked dry for its oil.

That's what they want. But many things could hinder their plans. For a start, a UN "contingency planning report," says that up to 500,000 Iraqis could suffer injuries and need medical treatment in the war. This grim human suffering could disrupt food distribution and health services as well as increasing political resentment.

There are political problems with who takes control of these bodies. Bush wants his head of armed forces in Iraq, General Tommy Franks, to head the occupation and someone like Stormin' Norman Schwarzkopf - US forces leader in the last Gulf War - to head up the "interim civilian administration". Others aren't so sure that's a good idea!

US strategists hope that the oilfields stolen from the Iraqi people will make enough money to defray the cost of occupation. But official estimates are that a US peacekeeping force of 75,000 to 200,000 would cost between $17 billion and $46 billion every year.

An American economist estimates that, even if a defeated Saddam doesn't set fire to the oilfields, the oilfields will only produce 25 billion a year to help cover the financial costs of this war. The war's human costs are of course enormous.

Blair losing support over Iraq

TONY BLAIR'S arrogant dismissal of public opposition to war against Iraq is taking its toll politically.

According to a Times/Populus poll, support for Labour has fallen to its lowest level for ten years - just 1% ahead of the Tories.

34% of people say their opinion of Blair had gone down because of Iraq. Women in particular are moving against Blair and New Labour.

Blair is taking a huge political risk by backing a US-led war. The enormous opposition that exists against war as well as over issues such as cuts, privatisation and low pay needs to be channelled into building a new mass party that can provide a political alternative to the pro-war, pro-big business stance of New Labour.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 14 February 2003:

After the 15 February mass demo: Where Do We Go From Here?

Anti-war news

No War For Oil

Building The Resistance

BP Protest - no blood for oil

Firefighters Stand Up To Labour

Fighting For System Change

North Korea - The 'Evil' George W. Bush Can Live With

Israel: What Way Out Of The "Bloody Trap"?


 

Home   |   The Socialist 14 February 2003   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Anti-war:

triangleTories Out demo - Photos

triangleAttacks ratchet-up Syrian conflict and fuel tensions between powers

triangleDebates on building the anti-Trump movement

Iraq:

triangle'From Militant to the Socialist Party' - new book now available

triangleHow Blairism sank its claws into the Labour Party

War:

triangleShocking insight into Isis

triangleChe Guevara 50 years on - revolutionary socialist and fighter

triangleBin strike: council humiliated in court battle - but war isn't over yet

US:

triangleSwansea Socialist Party: Mother Jones - A US labour pioneer

triangleJoin the Orgreave Halloween rally

Union:

triangleWorkplace news in brief

Tony Blair:

triangleFrom Militant to the Socialist Party

Nato:

triangleSyria: Is an end to the war in sight?

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

12/10/17

Cleaners

Justice for Tube cleaners demo

11/10/17

Salford

Salford Unison condemns pay cuts

11/10/17

Royal Mail

CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

11/10/17

Carlisle

Carlisle NHS campaigners hand in petition to MP

11/10/17

Green

Don't wreck our rec! Campaigning to save green space in Standish

11/10/17

Fire

No more fire deaths - ensure safety now!

11/10/17

Cardiff

Cardiff Socialist Students confront 'Parasite' Jacob Rees-Mogg

11/10/17

John McDonnell

Manchester rally discussed unionisation and nationalisation

11/10/17

Orgreave

Join the Orgreave Halloween rally

11/10/17

Union

Workplace news in brief

11/10/17

Democratic rights

Who's watching who?: The fight for justice, trade union and democratic rights

6/10/17

Northern Ireland

Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

5/10/17

Runcorn

Too much to cross the Mersey

4/10/17

Royal Mail

Set for national strike action

4/10/17

London

Supporting the general strike in Catalonia

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle13 Oct The end of the Tories?

triangle11 Oct Nasty party imploding...drive out the Tories

triangle11 Oct CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

triangle11 Oct The fight against racial discrimination is tied to fighting against...

triangle11 Oct Catalonia: Workers can finish what Puigdemont won't

triangle6 Oct Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

triangle4 Oct The nasty party turns on itself... but the Tories must be driven out

More ...

triangle16 Oct Teesside Socialist Party: After the party conferences

triangle17 Oct London: TUC lobby & rally; and London march

triangle18 Oct Warrington & St Helens Socialist Party: 1917-2017; the October Russian Revolution

triangle18 Oct Hackney Socialist Party: 100 years ago - the Bolshevik-led revolution

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2