Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

From The Socialist newspaper, 29 March 2002

Council Housing Under Attack

UNTIL 8 April, Birmingham city council are balloting all their 88,000 council tenant households on whether to transfer the housing stock to new private landlords. Glasgow has been balloting on the same issue. New Labour see these votes, in Britain's largest council landlords, as critical. CLIVE WALDER from Birmingham and ERIC STEVENSON from Glasgow City UNISON report on the fight against privatisation.

Birmingham: Vote "No" to housing transfers

IN BIRMINGHAM, the city council seem to be so scared of losing their ballot that they are resorting to crude threats to try to intimidate tenants into voting for transfer.

The government appointed Lord Falconer (famous for making a pig's ear of running the Millennium Dome) as their trouble-shooter. According to the Birmingham Evening Mail, tenants are effectively told to "hand over your homes or kiss goodbye to the money needed for quality repairs".

Falconer rules out using the council's existing housing debt for repair and renovation because the council "have a history of poor performance and would take some time to get to the standards required" and are unfit to receive extra government funding.

He blatantly says that if tenants reject stock transfer there's no extra government money for housing so tenants' only hope is transfer.

The government know how unpopular privatisation is, so they deny that stock transfer is privatisation, saying that the new landlords are Housing Associations, regulated by the Housing Corporation.

Yet the Housing Corporation has failed to take action in any case where landlords of ex-council housing break their rent-fixing formulas. And while the new landlords are 'not-for-profit' organisations, the banks that lend them the money certainly aren't.

They also claim that tenants will have more control over policy and service delivery because they have more than a third of places on the management board. With maths like that, no wonder Falconer failed so spectacularly at the dome!

Tenants' reps on the new boards undertake to make decisions consistent with the landlord's interests. In other words they don't represent tenants at all. That's why reps have already resigned from the shadow housing boards set up prior to stock transfer.

Falconer says that rents should reflect a property's location and condition. So new and city-centre properties will probably attract higher rents for possible conversion to yuppie accommodation in future. Nothing is said anywhere about tenants' ability to pay.


THE COUNCIL say that stock transfer will raise 1.25 billion for repair and renovation. Yet the council admit that between 2 billion and 4 billion is needed to bring all the city's housing stock up to acceptable standards.

Clearly not all the repairs will be done. Meanwhile tenants lose any accountability they had and rents will gradually go up to suit their fat-cat financiers.

In 1998, five estates in Birmingham's city centre were privatised. Within weeks, tenants were clamouring to return to council control. Some of those tenants pay up to 20 a week in service charges and on privatised Castle Vale, rents went up 16 a week last year.

In Coventry, the new landlords recently rewrote the tenancy agreement just a year after taking control of the council's housing. Any assurances from the council are worthless - they will no longer be the landlord and will have no influence over tenancy conditions.

Ironically, the New Labour government are changing public borrowing rules in 2004 so the council could borrow to fund large-scale building and modernisation.

Housing Associations borrow money at much higher rates of interest than councils and councils don't pay VAT on their building work. This will inevitably be reflected in rents. Social housing will be funded by private rather than public money if stock transfer goes ahead so housing policy, rent and repair levels will be decided by shareholders, not by public need.

If tenants vote 'No', the council would be unlikely to keep getting away with its current neglect of its housing as the public scandal would undermine the seats of many Labour councillors.

A 'No' vote should be used to get meaningful extra public funding for housing.

There is huge opposition to stock transfer. With a vigorous campaign which explains the facts, tenants can sink Blair's privatisation flagship without trace.

Glasgow - Keep Our Homes Public

GLASGOW CITY Council proposes to hand over all its council tenants to Glasgow Housing Association (GHA), in a huge stock transfer.

The Westminster government is writing off Glasgow's huge debt of 900 million (mostly from the post-war housing programme), while the Scottish Executive promises up to 800 million more in public finance.

These additional funds will partly fill the gaps in GHA's business plan, to satisfy the banks financing the project. So public money will help fill big business's coffers.

GHA have bombarded tenants with glossy material calling the stock transfer a "once in a lifetime offer" to improve Glasgow's housing and build new homes.

The publicity campaign, having already spent up to 5 million, is now in overdrive with adverts in newspapers and at bus stop shelters, leafleting tenants at home and council offices. How much more public money will be spent?

Write off the debts

Why can't the debt be written off with the houses remaining in public ownership? The council could then use the millions released from its rental income to modernise all its houses.

The extra money promised by the executive could also be used to build new homes. Communities could be transformed without needing the transfer. This should be the choice offered by the council.

Tenants could also have a greater say in running their homes and communities. The structures are already there - Tenants Associations and neighbourhood-based forums already exist.

Under the council we can at least remove our councillors at elections. Transfer to an unelected, unaccountable quango would cost millions from the public purse. Housing Associations (HAs) have done some good work over the years with grants made available to them, but the proposed privatisation is not acceptable.

Campaigners for a No vote have a vision of modernised publicly owned houses with affordable rents, within regenerated communities for future Glasgow residents.

The Glasgow Campaign for a 'No' Vote and the council's trade union campaign (supported by the STUC) are calling for tenants to vote 'No'.

If we succeed, this vote must be used to demand that the debt be written off and the democratically elected council along with its tenants be allowed to implement the vision which the tenants deserve.

The Socialist Says

Private Sector Failure

THE PRIVATE sector has failed to build affordable housing for those on lower or average incomes. In the last two decades, over two million council homes have been lost while only half a million housing association homes replaced them.

This has hit the availability of reasonably priced accommodation. In 1968, 414,000 new homes were built. Last year, in a post-war trough, even the capitalist builders themselves admit that only 162,000 were constructed.

Private homebuilders tend to concentrate on "executive estates" built on a speculative basis for those who can pay, rather than affordable housing for those in need.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.

In The Socialist 29 March 2002:

Teach Labour A Lesson

Say No To War

Rising Anger At New Labour

Fight The Bosses' Jobs Massacre

Council Housing Under Attack

Biggest Demo In History Engulfs Rome

Wars - The Horror Of Capitalism

Public and Commercial Services union elections: Time For Change


Home   |   The Socialist 29 March 2002   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  

Related links:


triangleThe Socialist Inbox

triangleRough sleeping crisis: make homes, not arrests

triangleLabour council Blairites deselected

triangleTory housing policy: build zilch, hike prices

triangleThem & us


triangleNew ebook: Liverpool A City That Dared To Fight

triangleBristol libraries safe - for now - as council caves to pressure

triangleKirklees bin workers ballot for strike over schedule and bullying

triangleBirmingham bin workers win!


triangleWhere is Scotland going?

triangleGlasgow jannies win famous victory against council cutters

triangleGlasgow janitors win famous victory


triangleBirmingham South East Socialist Party: Can the Labour Party be changed?

triangleSocialist Students day of action demands free education


triangleCorbyn must challenge pro-gentrification council leader or others will

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis



Local government pay: fight for the 5% claim, fully funded



Corbyn's Labour can defeat Tories with socialist programme



Branson sues NHS: kick out the profiteers



Royal wedding exposes them-and-us visa system



RBS to sack 1,000: nationalise the banks



Rough sleeping crisis: make homes, not arrests



End Tory war on poor



Nationalise rail now


Them & Us

Them & us



Tory housing policy: build zilch, hike prices



Make the Tories history



Birmingham bin workers win!


British economy

Amber warning lights flash on British economy



After the budget - unions must launch pay fight


Climate change

Carbon dioxide hits 800,000-year high: end profit-driven pollution

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle8 Dec Local government pay: fight for the full 5% claim

triangle6 Dec Strikers rally in Liverpool

triangle6 Dec Corbyn's Labour can defeat Tories with socialist programme

triangle5 Dec Victory at Glenfield shows people power can save our NHS

triangle5 Dec Labour council Blairites deselected

triangle30 Nov Victory: Glenfield Children's Heart Centre saved!

triangle30 Nov Dramatic retelling of Grunwick strike

More ...

triangle11 Dec Leeds Socialist Party: Campaigning workshop

triangle11 Dec Bristol North Socialist Party: Christmas Quiz

triangle12 Dec Birmingham South East Socialist Party: Can the Labour Party be changed?

triangle12 Dec Liverpool Socialist Party: Fighting council cuts

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017





















Platform setting: = No platform choice