Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/530/4041

From The Socialist newspaper, 23 April 2008

'The Conscience of a Liberal' by Paul Krugman

Reviewed by Peter Taaffe

As the pace of the intractable crisis of world capitalism speeds up and deepens, so the frantic rush to find solutions gathers pace. In place of the paeans of praise for globalised capitalism, the 'hidden hand of the market', free market 'superiority', etc, it can be predicted that an avalanche of books, rejecting these and the neo-liberal ideas that went with them, will now appear. Keynesian or neo-Keynesian ideas - state solutions to solve economic problems - are back on the agenda.

Paul Krugman is better placed than many to lead the way. He has systematically demolished the neo-liberal project of the 'Bushies' in the columns of the New York Times in order, as he sees it, to provide solutions which are 'liberal' and 'humane'. But he restricts himself to the limits of the capitalist system.

He rejects 'supply-side', monetarist economics - controlling the money supply or tax cuts for the rich, allegedly to boost investment in industry. He favours 'demand side', maintaining and boosting incomes in order to alleviate the looming crisis.

He is, in other words, from the Keynesian school of capitalist economists, broadly committed to 'priming the pump', boosting demand in straitened economic circumstances. He has been joined by a growing band of economists, clamouring for state intervention to bail out their system, at a considerable cost to the rest of us in tax increases.

Krugman draws heavily on the example of the 'New Deal' of the 1930s under US President Franklin D Roosevelt (FDR), which is pictured as laying the foundations for the mighty economic upswing in the US that developed at the end of the thirties right through until 1973-74. He prettifies what actually took place during this period and romanticises in particular the role of Roosevelt, a shrewd and, if necessary, brutal capitalist politician.

For Krugman, US history is compartmentalised into distinctive phases. There was the long 'gilded age' of the 1870s, similar to the present period, following the American Civil War, which lasted until the New Deal of the 1930s.

In 1900 there were 22 billionaires; by 1925, 32. Yet, allegedly because of Roosevelt's 'New Deal', in 1957 there were only 16 billionaires. There are 160 billionaires in the US today.

In the 'gilded age', capitalist parties exercised ruthless political control through measures which included the disenfranchisement of many American workers. Millions were unable to vote because they were 'non-naturalised immigrants'.

In the 'dollar democracy', expenditure of huge sums in elections and, of course, the use of the methods of divide and rule were deployed to keep different ethnic and religious groups at each others throats.

Rose-coloured glasses

Notwithstanding the Civil Rights and Voters Rights acts of the 1960s, playing the 'race card' has remained a vital ingredient of US 'democracy'. Today Barack Obama's Democrat opponent, Hillary Clinton, is not averse to resorting to these dirty methods when the power of the presidency is at stake.

To say that the author looks at Roosevelt and the New Deal in the 1930s through rose-coloured spectacles is an understatement. Inadvertently, Krugman admits the failure of Roosevelt. By his second term, "FDR spoke... of one third of the nation [still] ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished." Krugman's beliefs that Roosevelt had a conscious plan for massive reform, summed up in his phrase 'New Deal', is a myth.

Art Preis, in his monumental Labor's Giant Step, quotes the words of Roosevelt's Secretary of Labor, Francis Perkins: "The New Deal was not a plan with form or content. It was a happy phrase he had coined during the campaign, and its value was psychological. It made people feel better."

Krugman insists that Roosevelt was a "friend of labor". But this impression is also completely false. Ferdinand Lundberg, in his classic study on those who ran America, America's 60 families, concluded that the 'New Deal' was neither "revolutionary nor radical".

Roosevelt was supposed to have begun to abolish unemployment, yet his works programmes never provided jobs for more than 25% of the jobless. Unemployment remained as a malignant growth in the US throughout the 1930s, totalling over ten million in 1940, compared to just over 12 million in 1933.

Status quo

Even Roosevelt's National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), enacted in June 1933, in effect only sought to guarantee the status quo of worker and employer, "one in possession of little, the other in control of much", in order to restore industrial stability.

True, the labour movement correctly used this legislation to prosecute their own interests. The leader of the mineworkers' union, John Lewis, in 1933 sent an army of union organisers into the coalfields shouting: "The President wants you to join the union." Roosevelt himself was the last to subscribe to such sentiments!

It was the independent, magnificent movement, prompted by the beginnings of a boom in 1933-34, which swept almost four million new workers into the unions and created the colossal Congress of Industrial Organisations (CIO).

It was no conscious policy of Roosevelt, but the beginnings of natural revival after the worst slump in capitalist history, reinforced by increased arms production, both before and during the Second World War, that laid the basis for the post-1945 economic upswing, particularly in the 1950s, 1960s and early 1970s.

This is presented by the author as a golden age, "as a paradise lost". In a process he describes as the 'great compression', the incomes of the capitalists allegedly shrank, and "America in the 1950s was a middle-class society". These are exaggerations. While real living standards of the mass of the population grew, class divisions remained, albeit ameliorated by the boom.

Moreover, while the relative share of the capitalists may have been somewhat 'compressed' - and this is disputed by many economists and commentators of the period - the absolute rise in profits of US big business was indisputable. Reinvesting this was a key factor in American big business's pre-eminence within world capitalism.

US society was torn apart in the late 1960s, and Krugman correctly points out that this was even against the background of a boom. This was a "magic economy" that seemingly provided jobs for everyone. Wages were "rising every year" and there was a minimum wage at "$1.25 an hour [which] was the equivalent of more than $8 in today's dollars, far higher than today's minimum wage of $5.50."

Even the Republican Nixon presidency in 1972 was much more to the 'left' than the Democrat presidency of Clinton or even Carter. Famously, Nixon declared in 1970 that "I am a Keynesian now".

That period has well and truly gone, as Krugman demonstrates. Corporate profits "are now at the highest level, as a percentage of GDP, since 1929." A massive attack on the conditions of the US working class, detailed by the author, is reflected in the catastrophe in the health sector. Almost alone amongst the advanced industrial countries, there has been no predominantly state financed health cover in the US.

Instead, the unions have used their bargaining power during the boom to extract health cover from the big corporations. But in changed circumstances: the closure of plants, joblessness and the weakness of the unions; this largely private health insurance system "leaves 45 million workers without health coverage".

On the rise of the neo-conservatives and their brutal ideology Krugman is very good and quotes an article by one of their gurus, Irving Kristol, in the Wall Street Journal called 'Income Inequality without Class Conflict'. This creature wrote: "Income inequality tends to be swamped by even greater social equality." Meanwhile three million US citizens could be forced out of their houses through the subprime crisis and the credit collapse.

Therefore, Krugman concludes we must go back to a bygone age - largely illusory - of "income equality" associated with the 'New Deal'. He outlines a number of measures that could reinvent the age of the 'great compression'. This involves the fight for an increased minimum wage and higher taxes on the rich - which we would support - which form an important part of the 'progressive agenda'.

However, his solution is cautious, if not meagre. He does not put forward an overarching Keynesian programme, a big boost to public expenditure, as one might expect from a manifesto of a 'liberal'. This is because many of the planks of Keynesianism have been tried in the US, albeit unconsciously, and the state and the 'consumer' are massively burdened by debt.

The boom itself was fuelled by 'asset Keynesianism', the rise in property prices, largely benefiting the rich. This in turn funded a credit bubble, which gave a massive boost to capitalism, particularly the financial plutocrats, which is now unwinding.

There is little scope for classical Keynesianism in the straitened economic circumstances of US imperialism today. This is not to say that the capitalists will not still increasingly advocate such measures in the dire economic situation which looms. This could involve the 'nationalisation' of banks - à la Northern Rock.

Faced with a mass movement for change, concessions can be made - for instance, through an increase in the minimum wage. But what is given with one hand can be taken away with the other through price increases. Deflation - cuts in the working class's share of the wealth they create - and inflation are ultimately head and tails of the same capitalist coin.

Krugman yearns for a return to the methods of the 1950s, when Democrats and Republicans amicably collaborated in 'bi-partisanship'. He attacks Ralph Nader because he "mocked politicians from the two major parties as 'Republicrats'", because most "Americans view the parties as being very different indeed". This is false from top to bottom. Yes, the politics of the 'lesser evil' exist in the US as elsewhere because of the revulsion felt at the Bush presidency.

More than any other president since 1945, Bush has openly stood for the rich and the greater imperial appetite of US imperialism, as witnessed in Iraq.

That the Republicans' defeat is not guaranteed in the forthcoming election is a searing criticism of the Democrats. They offer no fundamental challenge to capitalism, either on the domestic or the international front. Despite this, and particularly because of the failure of Bush and the chronic condition of US capitalism, they are still most likely to win the presidential election, either with Obama or Clinton.

Therefore, as useful as Krugman's book is in providing much detail to fill out an historical and contemporary analysis of the US, it provides no lasting answer for American workers at this decisive turning point in history.

The creation of a mass independent party of the working class with radical policies is the only real way of both reflecting the class polarisation which is taking place and opening up a new era of advance for the US workers.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 23 April 2008:

The rich get richer... and we foot the bill!

Editorial: Brown's government lurching from pillar to post


Socialist Party workplace news

Support striking teachers

Shelter workers escalate action

Why DWP workers are striking

Oil workers to strike back at pensions threat


Socialist Party election campaign

Vote socialist on 1 May


Socialist Party news and analysis

Gloucester says... 'save our post offices'

Why drug firms should be nationalised


The Socialist Interview

Jersey - Growing anger against elite of secrets


Socialist Party feature

How can we defeat the far right?

Campaign to unionise migrant workers


Socialist Party review

'The Conscience of a Liberal' by Paul Krugman


International socialist news and analysis

Zimbabwe: Workers' strength stops arms shipment

Italy: Left leaders opened way for Berlusconi victory

France 1968: month of revolution. Speaking tour

France 1968: Book by Clare Doyle


 

Home   |   The Socialist 23 April 2008   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Paul Krugman:

triangleChina at a turning point

triangleEU revenge against Greek workers

US:

triangleSwansea Socialist Party: Mother Jones - A US labour pioneer

triangleJoin the Orgreave Halloween rally

triangleTheresa May, Frida Kahlo and turning women into wares

triangleThem & Us

Class:

triangleFighting on class policies

triangleLand registry in third pay walk out

Capitalist:

triangleThe fight against racial discrimination is tied to fighting against capitalist austerity

Capitalism:

triangleTower Hamlets Socialist Party: "You can't have capitalism without racism" (Malcolm X)

Keynesian:

trianglePerspectives for Britain 2017

Democrats:

triangleHurricane Harvey: A tragedy made far worse by capitalism

Imperialism:

triangleChe Guevara 50 years on - revolutionary socialist and fighter

Market:

triangleNasty party imploding...drive out the Tories

Reviews and comments

Reviews and comments

11/10/17

Theresa May

Theresa May, Frida Kahlo and turning women into wares

11/10/17

Docks

Poverty, repression and fightback on the docks

11/10/17

The Socialist

The Socialist Inbox

11/10/17

TV

Shocking insight into Isis

2/10/17

Sexism

Hugh Hefner's exploitation of women

27/9/17

Football

Women's football - Sampson allegations

20/9/17

Letters

The Socialist Inbox

20/9/17

Socialist

Interview: the "socialist John Le Carré"

20/9/17

Women

Refreshing, anticapitalist - but little pointing a way forward

13/9/17

Women

New documentary asks women how their bodies are sexualised and policed

13/9/17

Letters

The Socialist inbox

13/9/17

Che Guevara

Intimate insight into a revolutionary icon

6/9/17

Pensions

Bosses' pensions robbery

6/9/17

EU

How the Single Market blocks socialist policies

6/9/17

Tolpuddle

'Let the producers of wealth unite - and what can withstand them?'

triangleMore Reviews and comments articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle13 Oct The end of the Tories?

triangle11 Oct Nasty party imploding...drive out the Tories

triangle11 Oct CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

triangle11 Oct The fight against racial discrimination is tied to fighting against...

triangle11 Oct Catalonia: Workers can finish what Puigdemont won't

triangle6 Oct Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

triangle4 Oct The nasty party turns on itself... but the Tories must be driven out

More ...

triangle16 Oct Teesside Socialist Party: After the party conferences

triangle17 Oct London: TUC lobby & rally; and London march

triangle18 Oct Warrington & St Helens Socialist Party: 1917-2017; the October Russian Revolution

triangle18 Oct Hackney Socialist Party: 100 years ago - the Bolshevik-led revolution

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2