Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/419/4769

From The Socialist newspaper, 8 December 2005

Is there a pensions crisis?

THE GOVERNMENT have launched an all-out attack on pensions. Whilst they sit on one of the best public-sector pensions schemes available, MPs and government ministers lecture us all about living too long and not saving enough. KEN SMITH exposes the truth behind the pensions 'crisis' and puts forward a socialist programme for pensions.

Q - Does the Socialist Party support the raising of the retirement age?

We are absolutely opposed to raising the state retirement age. This is robbery from millions of workers who have paid National Insurance.

A worker aged 20 now will lose nearly 14,000 of pension entitlements (at current values) by the time they retire in 2050. This is in addition to the thousands they may have lost with the bosses continuing to attack occupational pensions.

The Turner Report shows once again that retirement and pensions entitlement is a class question. Many manual workers and low-paid workers will never reach the state retirement age - whether it is 65 or extended to 68.

And even if you reach retirement age, a report from the Faculty and Institute of Actuaries in January 2005 showed that the size of someone's pension determines their life expectancy. According to them, people on pensions of less than 4,500 a year are likely to die earlier than those with a pension of more than 13,000 a year.

For many workers, the need to resist the attacks on pensions will clearly be a matter of life and death.

We are in favour of flexibility over retirement ages. Starting at 55, workers should be able to retire on a full pension. Those who want to continue work should be able to do so or do some part-time work with part pension to bridge the gap between work and retirement for those who want it.

The Turner Report favours big business - by reducing the burden on them to provide occupational pensions. It also appears to offer a simpler way of providing a safety net to stop pensioners falling into absolute poverty without means testing. However, it does nothing to effectively remedy pensioner poverty or close the gap in wealth in retirement between the haves and the have nots.

In fact, it is possible that if the Turner Report were implemented it would mean the end of occupational pensions - at least in the private sector. Therefore there could be a whole generation of private-sector workers who will face a retirement just above the poverty level, as opposed to a retirement income that guarantees a certain security.


Q - Is there a pensions crisis?

The biggest pensions crisis that already exists is that millions of older people have retired into extreme poverty, living on means-tested benefits.

There is also a crisis of the bosses' own making in the funding of occupational pensions. They had an 80 billion surplus in 2000 and a 77 billion deficit in 2002.

Many pension funds are in danger of collapsing, unless the bosses were to forgo their super-profits and dividends and put billions of pounds back into the schemes.

In terms of a generalised demographic crisis - the idea that we are all living too long - there is not a pensions crisis. Only a few decades ago we were all told we would be able to retire in the future at the age of 50 because of new technology and rising prosperity.

But the neo-liberal offensive - the drive for super-exploitation to produce super-profits for capitalism - has seen bosses and governments try to drive down the wages and social wage of workers.

This has gone further in some countries, although all the advanced capitalist countries are trying to cut government expenditure that serves the interests of working-class people.


Q - Can the state afford decent pensions?

According to Treasury figures, the UK spends only 5.5 % of gross domestic product (GDP) on pensions when the European average is around 10%.

Currently, the figure of 5.5% of GDP or 50 billion on pension benefits includes the basic state pension, SERPS, the second state pension, the minimum income guarantee and the winter fuel payment.

But, included in this portion of GDP are huge amounts in subsidies the government gives to private pensions. Tax relief for private pensions and those who have opted out of the second state pension is now the equivalent of 2.5% of GDP. Half of that money goes to the richest 10% of taxpayers - with the top 2.5% grabbing over a quarter.


Q - What's the Socialist Party's alternative on pensions?

These measures would cost around 15 billion a year.

But 100 billion has been lost to the Treasury by accountancy firms using tax evasion methods.

There is also a 25 billion surplus in the national insurance fund - because state pensions have dropped so much relative to earnings in the last 20 years.

If the tax relief for the richest taxpayers was reduced or abolished, if corporation tax was increased and if state expenditure on defence - over 27 billion a year - and debt interest repayment - over 24 billion a year - were all used, then the government would have more than enough to cover additional future pension liabilities and considerably raise the state pension, at the very least.


Q - What should the unions do now?

Push the TUC or their own trade unions to act on the decision of September's TUC congress and call a national demo on pensions.

This would unite private and public-sector workers with existing pensioners in the initial fight to retain the retirement age at 65 and for decent pensions for all.


Turner Report

Tory shadow minister quotes Engels!

THE SO-CALLED pensions crisis has certainly given anyone still hoping that Gordon Brown will re-claim the Labour Party for socialism cause for second thoughts.

Jared Wood

On the face of it Brown is in fact to the right of Blair on this issue. Blair has broadly supported Turner's proposal for an increase in the state pension to be paid across the board to all pensioners while Brown is keen on more means testing with increased payments only going to the very poorest pensioners. Both Blair and Brown agree that the retirement age must increase (for low-paid workers relying on the state pension, not them) in order to minimise public spending.

But Turner's proposal for an increase in the basic pension is not motivated by a left-leaning concern for poor pensioners. In fact the idea of a more generous state pension has already been trailed by David Willetts, Conservative shadow Trade and Industry Secretary.

Borrowing from the language of EngelsQ, Willetts has called for the 'socialisation' of pension provision, surely some mistake!

It is a safe bet that Willetts, Blair and Turner have not embraced Engels' belief in scientific socialism but they support a greater role for the state in pension provision to relieve companies of the costs involved in providing occupational pensions and "avoid years of corporate underperformance" (Willetts). Or to put it another way to protect profits. They are also concerned that by 2050 over 70% of pensioners would qualify for the additional means-tested pension and this would discourage workers from saving out of their limited wages.

Adair Turner himself was formally the director general of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI). Any difference that does emerge between Turner, Blair and Brown will have nothing to do with improving the outlook for British workers in retirement and everything to do with balancing corporate profits against lower government spending and lower taxes on business.

Turner presents pages of impressive-looking tables and charts. But they all start from the premise that because there is a greater proportion of pensioners than before we cannot afford to retire at such an early age. But nowhere is this case even made, let alone proven.

According to the Office for National Statistics (www.statistics.gov.uk), Britain's total economic output (GDP) divided by the number of people in Britain (GDP per capita) has increased by 300% since 1948. If we now have three times as much output per head (these figures allow for inflation) why on earth can we not increase, never mind cut, pension entitlement?

Is Gordon Brown telling us that his economic miracle is all a big lie and in reality we can no longer match the productivity growth of the past 60 years? Either the political and industrial leaders of Britain plc expect a steep economic recession or they want to cut pensions to increase profits still more. Either way, their starting point is that their profit-led system is incapable of even maintaining the level of welfare British workers enjoyed in the post-war era.

Questions also arise when Turner's projections for life expectancy are studied. No account is taken of the huge differences in life expectancy between manual workers who work until 65 and executives who retire in their fifties. According to the Office of National Statistics the life expectancy for a male unskilled worker born six years ago is only 67. Under Turner's proposal the average male manual worker would never see their pension book.

The Turner report is full of unproven assumptions and proposes to deny many of Britain's least well off workers a pension at all. Turner is telling every unskilled worker in Britain to work until they die. The report is an affront to human dignity, yet there is a conspiracy of silence amongst politicians and media barons, who are all committed to the defence of corporate profit over all other claims on the nation's wealth.

And there is the nub of the pensions crisis. It is not a crisis because Britain cannot afford to fund pensions but a crisis because Britain's business leaders are demanding a bigger and bigger slice of the cake, at workers' expense.


Turner makes rich richer and poor poorer

AN OECD report has exposed the fact that for many years, Turner's proposals will benefit better-off pensioners more than the poorest.

Everyone starting work in 2010 will benefit but in the short term the better off will benefit more.

This is because high earners will benefit from rights to the state earnings-related pension and the second pension - as well as benefiting from the restoration of the link between the basic state pension and earnings.

A pensions specialist at the OECD commented: "There are only two ways of reducing means testing: make the rich richer or the poor poorer."

Turner is recommending making the rich richer, to avoid them having to claim means-tested benefits, while keeping the poorest poor, for a very long time.


British pensioners in poverty

UK workers get 37% of their working-life earnings (made up from the state pension and occupational pensions on retirement on average

In the Netherlands workers get 70%; in Sweden 76% and in France workers get 71% of their working-life earnings.


Gas workers vote to strike

BRITISH GAS engineers, members of GMB, have voted to strike to protect their pensions. Nearly 6,000 workers voted by 4 to 1 for five 24-hour strikes, starting on 12 December.

Two years ago, British Gas/Centrica allowed their workforce to chose whether to close their existing schemes or pay increased contributions. The workers overwhelmingly voted to pay more to keep the scheme open and the company promised to abide by the result. They are now reneging on the agreement.

The engineers are responsible for domestic work, including boiler servicing and breakdowns.

TGWU members are also likely to back this action.


State pensions scandal

STATE PENSIONS in Britain have been falling behind other countries for decades. The percentage that state pensions are of average earnings varies from 40% in Denmark to 100% of the national minimum wage in the Netherlands.

Britain is the lowest by far.

The state pension figures for the major EU countries as a percentage of average earnings are:

Belgium 60%

Denmark 40%

Germany 65%

France 50%

Greece 80%

Netherlands 100% of national minimum wage

Italy 83% of average of total career earnings

Luxemburg 80% of average earnings

Portugal 80%

Spain 50%

UK 16.73%


"This is a wholly unacceptable attack on our deferred wages. If Brown and the rest of the New Labour crew do as rumoured and renege on the deal on public sector pensions they should be confronted with the biggest display of trade union action this side of World War Two."
Andrew Price, NATFHE NEC
"In Lincoln we've been campaigning on pensions through my UNISON branch.
I was told today by our branch chair that he had handed in his resignation to the Labour Party as this was "the final straw".
He said he was fed up with the housing issue, war in Iraq etc but the pensions issue had finally got to him.
 He said he had firmly believed that you could only have an influence from the inside but he'd had enough."
Marc Glasscoe
"The bosses are now using the Turner report as an excuse to attack the recent deal on pensions made between the public sector and the government.
What they are really trying to do is create division between workers, all of whom deserve a decent pension, whether they work in the public or private sector.
It is now incumbent on the TUC and the trade union movement to unite workers together, defend what we've got and ensure no detriment to any worker's pension."
Marion Lloyd, PCS NEC

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 8 December 2005:

Save our NHS!

Strike back at Labour's attacks

Is there a pensions crisis?

Sign up to the campaign

Brown's low growth, low wage budget

Domestic violence: Change in sentencing guidelines a step forward

George Best

Tories elect 'Blair-lite' leader

Now working class and poor must build real socialism

Brazil: Growing crisis over Lula government's corruption scandal

Solidarity with Irish Ferries workers

Victory for Andy Beadle as he wins his job back

Sixth week of caretakers' strike

PCS Left Unity conference backs union leadership on pensions


 

Home   |   The Socialist 8 December 2005   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Pensions:

triangleSet for national strike action

triangleCWU strike ballot to win 'Four Pillars'

triangleCWU members prepare for industrial action at Royal Mail

triangleBosses' pensions robbery

triangleUN slams Tories for disabled rights ruin

Pensioners:

triangleBT attack on pension benefits

triangle'Freedom riders' lobby against violent policing

trianglePensioners oppose DUP deal

trianglePolice officers face misconduct charges over attack on 'freedom ride'

Pension:

triangleThyssenKrupp - Tata steel merger

triangleCWU strike ballot - why I'm voting Yes

triangleBMW strikers determined to win pensions dispute

Socialist:

triangleTower Hamlets Socialist Party: "You can't have capitalism without racism" (Malcolm X)

triangleTower Hamlets Socialist Party: Capitalism in Crisis - is Corbyn the answer?

The Socialist:

triangleWorkplace news in brief

Socialist Party:

triangleWest London Socialist Party: Young people need socialism!

US:

triangleSwansea Socialist Party: Mother Jones - A US labour pioneer

MPs:

triangleMagic money tree

Britain:

triangleThe end of the Tories?

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

12/10/17

Cleaners

Justice for Tube cleaners demo

11/10/17

Salford

Salford Unison condemns pay cuts

11/10/17

Royal Mail

CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

11/10/17

Carlisle

Carlisle NHS campaigners hand in petition to MP

11/10/17

Green

Don't wreck our rec! Campaigning to save green space in Standish

11/10/17

Fire

No more fire deaths - ensure safety now!

11/10/17

Cardiff

Cardiff Socialist Students confront 'Parasite' Jacob Rees-Mogg

11/10/17

John McDonnell

Manchester rally discussed unionisation and nationalisation

11/10/17

Orgreave

Join the Orgreave Halloween rally

11/10/17

Union

Workplace news in brief

11/10/17

Democratic rights

Who's watching who?: The fight for justice, trade union and democratic rights

6/10/17

Northern Ireland

Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

5/10/17

Runcorn

Too much to cross the Mersey

4/10/17

Royal Mail

Set for national strike action

4/10/17

London

Supporting the general strike in Catalonia

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle13 Oct The end of the Tories?

triangle11 Oct Nasty party imploding...drive out the Tories

triangle11 Oct CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

triangle11 Oct The fight against racial discrimination is tied to fighting against...

triangle11 Oct Catalonia: Workers can finish what Puigdemont won't

triangle6 Oct Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

triangle4 Oct The nasty party turns on itself... but the Tories must be driven out

More ...

triangle16 Oct Teesside Socialist Party: After the party conferences

triangle17 Oct London: TUC lobby & rally; and London march

triangle18 Oct Warrington & St Helens Socialist Party: 1917-2017; the October Russian Revolution

triangle18 Oct Hackney Socialist Party: 100 years ago - the Bolshevik-led revolution

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2