Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/330/5582

From The Socialist newspaper, 17 January 2004

Top-Up Fees - Your Questions Answered

Clare James, national coordinator of ISR, looks at what top-up fees will really mean for students and explains why we should organise to stop them.

What do students pay at the moment?

In 1997 New Labour announced the introduction of tuition fees and the abolition of the student grant.

The annual tuition fee is currently 1,125 per student. Some students with low parental income get this fee, or a proportion of it, paid for by their local education authority.

Due to the lack of a living grant many students have to take out loans to survive and many have to take part-time work to get through the living and studying costs of university. One in five students drop out of their courses mainly due to financial hardship. Even now some students are leaving university with debts of 15,000.

Tuition fees and abolishing the student grant were an attack on the right to a free education for all. By introducing tuition fees they have tried to get people 'used' to the idea of paying for education individually rather than society providing for everyone. And they have opened the doors for further cuts, commercialisation and privatisation of education.

What are top-up fees?

The government is proposing that the current tuition fee, which is paid upfront at the beginning of each academic year, is abolished in 2006. This will be replaced by a 'top-up' fee of up to 3,000 a year. This fee and any loans which students take out during their course will be paid back in a form of graduation tax by graduates at a rate of 9% of earnings once they are earning over 15,000 a year.

This would mean graduates ending up paying a greater proportion of their income in tax than is paid by millionaires! There will be a cap on top-up fees of 3,000. But it could be as soon as 2010 that universities get away with charging even more.

The government don't call these top-up fees, they refer to them as 'differential fees' because they want to allow universities to vary the fees depending on the university and the course.

Why are many people against this?

This is yet another attack on the right to a free quality education for all. Although the government is saying that the top-up fee could be anything from 0 - 3,000 there is no indication that any university will charge nothing.

The government has already estimated that at least three quarters of universities will charge the full 3,000. The top universities such as Cambridge and Oxford will be able to charge the full 3,000 because the rich who dominate these universities will always be able to pay.

Underfunded universities with poorer students will be forced to either charge the full 3,000 to try and make ends meet, thereby risking losing students who are put off going. Or, if they charge less than 3,000, they may be seen as offering only 'cheap' courses. For poorer students and universities top-up fees is a no-win situation.

But the poorest students won't have to pay the top-up fees and may even get a grant?

Due to the huge anger which exists among many people across the country against tuition fees the government has been forced to introduce a small grant for the poorest students from September 2004. This will be up to 1,000 a year for students whose family income is less than 15,200. All those with a family income between 15,200 and 21,185 will get a partial grant.

This is a step forward - but is nowhere near what is needed to ensure working class students can survive at university.

From 2006 the poorest students will get up to 3,000 of help a year made up of:

So what is wrong with that?

This in effect will only pay for the 3,000 top-up fees most universities will charge. So although the poorest students won't have to pay back this fee, the cost of living and studying will mean that the poorest students will have to take out the biggest loans to try and survive. This will still put many working class young people off going to university.

Also there will be many students who won't qualify for the grants, have families who don't have enough money to live on themselves, and therefore will not be able to get family help to go to university.

The bursary of up to 300 from the university is also unfair. Again, universities dominated by rich students won't have to pay out many bursaries as most of their students won't qualify. But universities such as the University of East London will have around 44% of students who are poor enough to qualify for the maximum support.

If this system is introduced it is clear that it will not help poorer students go to university. Students will still be left with huge debts to pay back and this will continue to put many young people off.

Richard Sykes, Rector of Imperial College, London, has said that he should be allowed to charge 10,000 or even 15,000 a year for courses as this would more closely reflect the cost and market value of a degree at his university. This could be the future for students is the principle of top-up fees goes through.

What can we do?

International Socialist Resistance (ISR) has called a school and college action day, of strikes and protests, on the day Parliament votes on the top-up fees Bill. We need to make it clear to the government that the campaign against fees and for a living grant will continue to grow and we will fight for as long as necessary.

Everyone should have the right to a properly funded education throughout their lives. Yet we are told by MPs such as Blair and Clarke (who didn't have to pay tuition fees!) that there isn't enough money for this! But Britain is the fourth richest country in the world - this doesn't add up.

Over 5 billion of public money has already been spent on the war and occupation of Iraq. Big business have had huge tax cuts since new Labour came to power. It's clear that there is plenty of money to provide a quality education for all but it is a question of where our money is spent.

We say that if this system can't afford to provide us with a decent education, pay us living wages, offer affordable homes or give young people a decent future then we can't afford this system. We are fighting for a socialist society based on need and not profit which can meet the needs of everyone.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 17 January 2004:

Stop Top-Up Fees

Top-Up Fees - Your Questions Answered

Top-Up Fees - The Beginning Of The End For Blair?

"Don't let money mean more than minds."

Stop top-up fees Action Day


Socialist Party features

Asylum Seekers Fast For Their Rights

High Fat, High Sugar And High Profit

The Jungle, By Upton Sinclair

Sharon Pushes For Annexation

Haiti: Mass Protests Against Autocratic Rule

Respect Unity Coalition - what we think


Socialist Party workplace news

Fight Low Pay

CWU Broad Left Affiliates To ISR

Fight For New Workers Party


 

Home   |   The Socialist 17 January 2004   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Fees:

triangleNasty party imploding...drive out the Tories

triangleFreshers week campaigning reports

triangleFight for free education

triangleFight tuition fees

Students:

triangleCardiff Socialist Students confront 'Parasite' Jacob Rees-Mogg

triangleLeeds Socialist Students marks 'International Safe Abortion Day'

triangleGoldsmiths Socialist Students & South London Socialist Party: Capitalism in Crisis - How do we fight back?

Pay:

triangleJustice for Tube cleaners demo

triangleThem & Us

University:

triangleUniversity of Leeds workers walk out

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

12/10/17

Cleaners

Justice for Tube cleaners demo

11/10/17

Salford

Salford Unison condemns pay cuts

11/10/17

Royal Mail

CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

11/10/17

Carlisle

Carlisle NHS campaigners hand in petition to MP

11/10/17

Green

Don't wreck our rec! Campaigning to save green space in Standish

11/10/17

Fire

No more fire deaths - ensure safety now!

11/10/17

Cardiff

Cardiff Socialist Students confront 'Parasite' Jacob Rees-Mogg

11/10/17

John McDonnell

Manchester rally discussed unionisation and nationalisation

11/10/17

Orgreave

Join the Orgreave Halloween rally

11/10/17

Union

Workplace news in brief

11/10/17

Democratic rights

Who's watching who?: The fight for justice, trade union and democratic rights

6/10/17

Northern Ireland

Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

5/10/17

Runcorn

Too much to cross the Mersey

4/10/17

Royal Mail

Set for national strike action

4/10/17

London

Supporting the general strike in Catalonia

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle13 Oct The end of the Tories?

triangle11 Oct Nasty party imploding...drive out the Tories

triangle11 Oct CWU fights court attempt to stop national strike

triangle11 Oct The fight against racial discrimination is tied to fighting against...

triangle11 Oct Catalonia: Workers can finish what Puigdemont won't

triangle6 Oct Boeing bust-up threatens thousands of skilled jobs

triangle4 Oct The nasty party turns on itself... but the Tories must be driven out

More ...

triangle16 Oct Teesside Socialist Party: After the party conferences

triangle17 Oct London: TUC lobby & rally; and London march

triangle18 Oct Warrington & St Helens Socialist Party: 1917-2017; the October Russian Revolution

triangle18 Oct Hackney Socialist Party: 100 years ago - the Bolshevik-led revolution

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2