Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/556/6608

From The Socialist newspaper, 12 November 2008

NUT leadership fails to call strike

In April, the morale of trade unionists across England and Wales was lifted when tens of thousands of teachers took strike action to oppose the years of below-inflation pay awards being imposed on them by New Labour.

Martin Powell-Davies, convenor, Socialist Party Teachers

Seven months on, despite all the doubts sown by both economic crisis and the failure of its leaders to follow up April's action for so long, members of the National Union of Teachers (NUT) have concluded a new ballot, again giving a majority of votes for further strike action.

With a turnout of 30%, nationally 52% of votes were cast in support of ongoing 'discontinuous' strike action. Support was notably stronger in some regions, such as London.

However, the NUT's national executive has decided that the margin was too narrow to call further action. This will be a bitter disappointment to many active NUT members as well as to other trade unionists, particularly civil servants in the PCS union, who have been seeking to build united public sector strikes.

Economic crisis

The news will be greeted with relief by government ministers who will be only too pleased to reinforce their message that trade unionists should act 'responsibly' in times of economic crisis. Of course, while teachers and other workers are left to struggle to make ends meet, the top bankers and greedy speculators who are really at fault will continue to pile up their wealth.

The NUT executive says that 'the campaign continues', as it must. But for now, action - or the lack of it - will speaker louder than yet more words. The School Teachers' Review Body reports in January on the pay award to be imposed for September 2009. There is nothing now to stop them recommending a fifth successive real-terms pay cut.

Of course, a call for action based on this tight ballot result would not have been without risk. Many of the officials and the right-wing on the executive, worried about members opposed to action leaving to join other unions, will have been only too happy to ditch the campaign. However, the decision to retreat risks demoralising the most active members and local reps who are so vital for any union.

But most of the Left - now nominally a majority on the executive - also decided that only a minority of members would respond to a strike call. Unfortunately, if the call had been made with the same lack of clarity that was apparent in many of the official ballot materials, they may well have been right.

Facts explaining how prices are outstripping pay rises are not enough on their own. To win wide support for action, the NUT needed to convince teachers that taking strike action could stop the robbery.

Letters that explained to teachers on a tight budget that 'unsustained action' meant going without pay, but which then failed to spell out the NUT's strategy to defeat the government, were unlikely to convince many teachers that the sacrifice was worth it.

In school meetings, classroom teachers often demonstrated a far more considered analysis of what was needed to achieve victory than their leaders. The apparent contradiction of teachers saying that: "I can't afford to strike, but if we have to, it needs to be for three days", was reported in several areas.

A determined battle needed to be prepared, including collecting for hardship funds to sustain the hardest-hit through extended action. For example, my own NUT association in Lewisham collected over 1,000 from members in April and had set a target of 2,000 to be raised if the action planned for November had gone ahead after all.

April's strike showed that, once action is called, more members will respond than those who voted for it, including some who voted against. Widespread action could have been built, even with this slim majority, but only if the NUT leadership had gone out to convince members that their union was serious about winning this dispute. Unfortunately, the prevarication since April had sent out the opposite message.

The delay was created by the NUT executive's initial decision to ballot for just a one-day strike, meaning that a further strike ballot then had to be organised if the campaign was to be continued after April.

The correct policy - of balloting for ongoing 'discontinuous' action - was dropped, in order to win the backing of right-wing faint-hearts. But, in doing so, a mechanism for fatally losing momentum was built into the strategy from the start.

This isn't just being 'wise after the event'. While on the national executive, Socialist Party member Linda Taaffe had warned against the Left's policy of making concessions to the Right to try and win 'unanimity' at all costs.

Her reward for pointing out such uncomfortable truths was to be manoeuvred off the executive by others on the Left.

At the NUT's annual conference last Easter, Socialist Party teachers tabled an amendment calling for the April action to be quickly followed by a ballot for further strikes in order to maintain vital momentum. However, most of the Left voted to close the debate just before the amendment was reached.

This meant that the possibility of striking alongside Unison in July, uniting teachers and school support staff, was lost.

Fortunately, conference did vote for a further strategy that Socialist Party teachers put forward to strengthen the campaign. Even the right-wing was forced to withdraw their opposition in the face of overwhelming support from delegates. Our amendment called for national action to embrace teachers' grievances over both pay and workload. But this agreed policy was mistakenly dropped by the national executive without any real explanation.

Widening the scope of our national ballot to include the NUT's pay, workload and class size demands would have significantly deepened support for action, uniting staff who see pay as their greatest grievance with others who see ending teachers' unbearable workload as an even greater necessity. It is a policy that must now be put into practice.

Critically, such an approach could also force the hand of the leadership of the other main teacher union, the NASUWT, who, while pretending to fight on workload, have shamefully entered into 'social partnership' with New Labour and refused to take action on pay.

The prospect of a joint struggle would enormously raise the confidence of teachers to fight in schools where the NASUWT is still the dominant union.

A bold programme of escalating national strike action, co-ordinated with other unions wherever possible, could force this embattled government to make concessions. After all, by threatening strike action, the PCS has just forced the government to offer negotiations over civil servants' pay.

Teachers need to be reminded of their potential strength, demonstrated in the wide publicity that the 24 April strike generated. That's because, as the British Chambers of Commerce has calculated, the strike cost businesses up to 68 million in lost working hours because parents had to take time off work or pay for extra child care.

The continual barrage of news about the gathering recession during the ballot period undoubtedly had an effect. Teachers voiced fears as to what the reaction of low-paid parents might be, and how the media would have falsely tried to portray strikers as 'greedy'.

The NUT leaders were too slow to explain that, unless we defend ourselves through action, workers will be made to pay the price for the bosses' crisis. By stepping back, teachers will not have helped a single friend or neighbour save their job.

On the contrary, taking action would have been the best way of raising the sights of other workers to stand firm to defend their livelihoods as well.

If these lessons are learned, the present retreat needs only to be a temporary setback. As New Labour looks to find savings to help pay for their banking bailouts, teachers' pay, pensions and conditions will come under further attack. Teachers will be forced to struggle. With a clear strategy, next time those struggles can win.

See also www.classroomteacher.org.uk

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 12 November 2008:


Socialist Party campaigns

Defend workers' jobs and pay

PCS union: Strike threat wins talks

Confined to one room

Fast news


Socialism 2008

Socialism 2008 - an inspiring weekend


War and occupation

Iraq, Afghanistan... End the occupations!


Socialist Party Marxist analysis

A political awakening propels Obama to victory

Why Labour won the Glenrothes by-election


Socialist Students

'Students in the Red' day of action

East Anglia region demands free education


Education

NUT leadership fails to call strike

Scotland: Victory for the Vale of Leven Four

The workload of a teacher


Socialist Party review

Prescott: the class system and me


 

Facebook   Twitter



Home   |   The Socialist 12 November 2008   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Bookshop






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter



Related links:

NUT:

triangle'Save Sedgehill': demo against forced academy

triangleStop academies in Lewisham

triangleWorkplace news in brief

triangleBuilding an anti-academies campaign

triangleLabour councils attack organised workers

Strike:

triangleOne-day strike of police staff

triangleEurope: a new wave of workers' struggle has begun

triangleQuiz 2014

triangleSharpak Yate packaging strike

Teachers:

triangleStudents join Lambeth walkout

triangleEducation: "a hurricane of ill thought initiatives"

triangleNASUWT members strike at Swinton High School

Pay:

triangleFoyles Living Wage campaign

triangleThem & Us

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

18/12/14

London

Foyles Living Wage campaign

15/12/14

Lewisham

'Save Sedgehill': demo against forced academy

12/12/14

Russell Brand

BBC's Question Time

12/12/14

Police

One-day strike of police staff

12/12/14

Leicester

Leicester "Cops off Campus" demo

11/12/14

Ireland

Solidarity with Irish anti-water charges movement

10/12/14

Socialism

We have a world to win!

10/12/14

Socialist Students

Socialist Students: fight for free education

10/12/14

Rail

Rail franchise jobs: TUPE or not TUPE?

10/12/14

Lambeth

Students join Lambeth walkout

10/12/14

Bristol

Sharpak Yate packaging strike

10/12/14

Appeal

Election appeal: finding cash to fight the cuts

10/12/14

East London

Campaign news in brief

10/12/14

London

Same job - we want the same pay!

10/12/14

Socialist

As Russell Brand prepares to take on Farage ...

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...

triangle15 Dec 'Save Sedgehill': demo against forced academy

triangle12 Dec BBC's Question Time

triangle12 Dec One-day strike of police staff

triangle11 Dec Put CIA torturers and paymasters in the dock

A striking Belgian firefighter

triangle10 Dec Europe: a new wave of workers' struggle has begun

We are the 99%, photo Paul Mattsson

triangle10 Dec We have a world to win!

triangle10 Dec Uprising against police violence in the US

More ...

triangle5 Jan Wirral Socialist Party: Venezuela

triangle7 Jan Leicester Socialist Party: Greens - an electoral alternative?

triangle8 Jan Swansea, Llanelli & West Wales Socialist Party: CWI report

triangle12 Jan Wirral Socialist Party: Stalinism Vs Socialism

More ...

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Find us on Facebook

Archive

Categories

1-9 

1-9 


Archives:

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice