Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

From The Socialist newspaper, 27 October 2000

Profit puts safety last

ON 17 October, a GNER King's Cross to Leeds Express crashed near Hatfield, killing four people. Once again railway safety has become headline news.

After engineers inspected the crash site, Railtrack are investigating a broken rail. They admit that they'd known about the condition of that stretch of track since January.

The old nationalised British Rail used to replace worn-out track and signalling equipment after a set time, regardless of wear and tear. Privatised Railtrack only replaces equipment when the bosses deem it necessary.

The number of broken rails increased from 750 in 1995 to 973 in 1998 and 937 last year. Even the rail regulator ordered an independent inquiry in August because Railtrack hadn't met their own targets for cutting down the number of broken rails.

Since Railtrack took over the network the number of track maintenance workers has gone down from 21,000 to 15,506, many of whom work for subcontracting firms.

The contractors blame Railtrack for cutting their profit margins but the privatised system encourages this competitive cost-cutting even if it repeatedly leads to accidents.

The rail industry's "safety last" culture is seen in many ways, not least in the failure to install Automatic Train Protection (ATP) which would stop high speed trains from passing red signals, as happened at Paddington.

ATP has been rejected on cost-benefit lines - it would cut into company profits. So we got the half-baked Train Protection Warning System (TPWS), which doesn't match European safety standards.

The privatised train companies have also demanded more intensive working from their drivers, putting up the maximum length of shifts from nine to eleven hours. This also affects safety standards.

Given the danger posed to rail workers by the privatised companies' penny-pinching on safety, the rail trade unions in particular should be discussing how to fight for improved safety standards. That should include strike action if necessary,

If the bosses threaten the unions with injunctions and legal damages, the unions should call a one-day strike of all railworkers as a warning shot to the bosses. Such a strike would gain massive support after the crash at Hatfield has shown up the bosses' contempt for both workers' and passengers' safety.

Put the bosses in the Dock

RAILTRACK'S CHIEF executive Gerald Corbett and the rest of his board should be in the dock, accused of corporate manslaughter.

Corbett offered to resign over the crash but that was a public relations gimmick. Top politicians rushed to defend him. Both the Tories who sold off the railways and Labour, who didn't renationalise it, have kept very quiet about the cause of the disaster.

Government ministers, past and present, have based their rail strategy on private ownership. They should also be in the dock over this crash.

We should fight to renationalise the privatised companies under workers' control and management, not under the thumb of capitalist ministers who caused the crisis in the first place.

Corbett attacked the privatisation system in a TV interview after the crash. "The railway was ripped apart at privatisation," he said. "The structure put in its place was not designed to optimise safety, investment or cope with the huge increase in the number of passengers."

This is an amazing statement from one of the bosses who has benefited most from privatisation. But we have heard similar apologies and excuses from Corbett and the rail bosses before but we never get any action.

Corbett blames the problems on 'a system designed to maximise the proceeds to the Treasury." That's rich. Certainly the Tory government wanted to get immediate cash from privatisation. But the present fat cat owners got the whole lot at a knock-down price of 5.3 billion on privatisation.

Since then, these firms have had huge subsidies from the Treasury, and have gained swollen profits and immense salaries courtesy of rail workers and passengers.

Nationalise the Railways

THE TORY government privatised the rail system in 1995, and made these fragmented, privatised companies' top managers rich. Meanwhile fares soared up and services deteriorated sharply.

The government has piled around 1 billion a year into subsidising the system. This shows up the contradiction of running a public service for private profit. You can't give company directors and shareholders massive profits and provide a safe, well-run public service with low fares.

After last year's Paddington disaster, there was pressure on Prescott to renationalise rail but Labour rejected it because it would cost 6.5 billion "which would be better spent on other public services".

But now Prescott's ten-year plan talks of ploughing 65 billion, mainly taxpayers' money, over the next ten years into a privatised rail system which he cannot control!

And why should Labour pay that much to buy back an industry which was practically given away? The bosses have made millions out of some 100 competing franchises, why should they be offered compensation? In 1971 Heath's Tory government nationalised Rolls Royce for 1 to stop it from collapsing.

What do people like Corbett know about the rail industry? He used to be finance director for food and drink firm Grand Metropolitan! His prime responsibility is to boost profits. But why should rail workers and passengers carry on paying for this privatised system?

The Tories starved the railways of funds before 1995 to make the rail service look like it desperately needed privatisation.

Now 1.3 billion of our money is going in subsidising the Train Operating Companies' profits. The government has increased these subsidies, ignoring their poor record on reliability and punctuality. Who gains? Railtrack push up their charges for access to the track. The companies hike up their profits, and boost their managers' and directors' inflated salaries.

Railtrack also expects to get some 4 billion to help it modernise the London to Glasgow West Coast line. If the rail industry was renationalised, that money could be reinvested directly to make the service safer and better.

An industry based on the profit motive has lowered safety standards and constantly worsened the service. The trade unions should campaign for strike action against a rail system, which puts rail workers', and passengers' lives at risk.

We don't need a return to the days of British Rail. We fight for public ownership and democratic control by workers and passengers. That would put the needs of the travelling public and workforce first, not the private companies' profits.

That publicly owned service would use the skills and knowledge of rail workers who understand their industry - they certainly know more than that superannuated gin salesman Gerald Corbett.

The industry should be under the democratic control and management of elected representatives of rail workers and the public who use the service. The service would then be geared to meet people's needs not private profit.

Rail Workers View: The Engineer

THE DANGER in any investigation of the Hatfield crash is that the last person to test the failed component will get the blame. Railtrack and the private rail operators won't want to discuss how much the profit motive has compromised the traditional safety culture on the track and in the railway depots.

By an engineer

As a professional engineer involved with testing safety-critical railway components, including rails, for over 25 years, I see the demoralisation of testing personnel as their jobs are downgraded or put out to contractors in order to save money.

Of course, contractors are supposed to carry out safety-critical work to the same Railway Group Standards as the permanent staff they displace. Indeed they need to hold certification proving their competence to carry out this work.

However, in practice many contractors are newly trained, in some cases being put though cut-down courses, and don't have the practical background experience in either railway engineering practice or the tests they're expected to perform.

In addition, lack of expertise amongst both contracting and private railway companies means that there's little or no surveillance and supervision of their work.

After the Ladbroke Grove crash there was a widespread demand for the Safety and Standards Directorate to be separated from Railtrack. This is necessary but it isn't enough.

It's not uncommon for the Safety and Standards Directorate to issue notices allowing the train operating companies and their contractors to ignore inconvenient provisions in the Railway Group Standards.

Rail safety demands the end of the cosy relationships between the Safety and Standards Directorate and private companies. There should be a massive increase in investment in training for new and established personnel, including real apprenceships for young people.

The railway system should return to public ownership, with democratic workers' control and management, to remove the profit motive from safety-critical engineering and testing.

The Socialist Says

Bring privatised rail bosses to justice for neglecting safety in their drive for profit.
Seize the bosses' profits and reclaim all public subsidies.
Renationalise rail and transport under democratic working-class control and management.
A massive programme of investment now to improve safety and service provision.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.

In The Socialist 27 October 2000:

Hands Off Our Services

Grants Not Fees

Palestinian Uprising Intensifies

Socialism 2000: An Inspiring Weekend

Profit puts safety last

Trotsky's Political Legacy


Home   |   The Socialist 27 October 2000   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  

Related links:


triangleBrutal rail privateer Abellio takes over Midlands rail services

triangleNationalise rail now

triangleThe Socialist inbox

triangleStrike wave continues

triangleStrikers picket the South Western Railway network


triangle4,800 young people hurt after officers 'restrain' them

triangleProfiteering NHS counter-fraud firm in alleged case of... fraud

triangle900 carers quit a day - nationalise social care now


triangleSchool staff strike against privatisation

triangleLabour council Blairites deselected


triangleDriving examiners walkout hits first day of new test

Historic events

Historic events


Russian revolution

Russia, October 1917: When workers took power


Che Guevara

Che Guevara 50 years on - revolutionary socialist and fighter



Mutinies and strikes: when Bolshevism threatened British bosses



Lewisham 1977: When socialists and workers defeated the far-right National Front



Marx's Capital at 150: an unequalled analysis and critique of capitalism


Russian revolution

Russia 1917: how art helped make the revolution


Russian revolution

July Days 1917: battles with counterrevolution



Lessons from the Russian revolution for LGBT+ struggle today



Liverpool's 1983-87 socialist council



The Pentrich uprising: revolution and counter-revolution in 19th century Britain


Russian revolution

June 1917: when workers in Britain first tried to form soviets


May Day

The real origins of May Day


Labour Party

How Blairism sank its claws into the Labour Party


Russian revolution

April 1917: how the Bolsheviks reorientated



1987 Zeebrugge disaster

triangleMore Historic events articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle8 Dec Local government pay: fight for the full 5% claim

triangle6 Dec Strikers rally in Liverpool

triangle6 Dec Corbyn's Labour can defeat Tories with socialist programme

triangle5 Dec Victory at Glenfield shows people power can save our NHS

triangle5 Dec Labour council Blairites deselected

triangle30 Nov Victory: Glenfield Children's Heart Centre saved!

triangle30 Nov Dramatic retelling of Grunwick strike

More ...

triangle12 Dec Birmingham South East Socialist Party: Can the Labour Party be changed?

triangle12 Dec Liverpool Socialist Party: Fighting council cuts

triangle13 Dec Caerphilly Socialist Party: Are we heading for an era of war?

triangle14 Dec Wakefield Socialist Party: Universal Credit - the Tories' latest assault on the poor

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017





















Platform setting: = No platform choice