Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

Reports and Campaigns


spotAbout the Socialist Party

spotAnti-capitalism

spotAnti-privatisation

spotAnti-war

spotElection campaigns

spotEnvironment

spotHealth

spotSocialist women

spotWorkplace

spotYouth and Students

All keywords


Education tags:

Academies (73)

Classroom assistants (7)

College (105)

Colleges (34)

Council (769)

Education (555)

ESOL (1)

Grant (20)

Medway (4)

Ofsted (1)

Performance (14)

Performance-related (2)

SATs (17)

School (251)

Schools (180)

Students (625)

Teachers (220)

Universities (59)


Reports and campaigns:

Anti-capitalism (642)

Anti-fascist (310)

Anti-racism (346)

Anti-war (741)

Asylum (86)

Black and Asian (189)

Children (153)

CNWP (108)

Corporate crime (2)

Disability (82)

Education (1958)

Election campaigns (880)

Environment (303)

Food (104)

Health and safety (9)

Health and welfare (100)

Housing (247)

Human Rights (179)

LGBT Pride (67)

Local government (1016)

Local services (1462)

Low pay (109)

Migration (11)

Nationalisation (58)

New workers party (296)

NHS (847)

Pensions (487)

Post Office (116)

Poverty (252)

Privatisation (530)

Public Services (524)

Socialism (382)

Sport (70)

Stop the slaughter of Tamils (46)

Students (983)

The state (662)

Transport (266)

TUSC (209)

Welfare rights (314)

Women (309)

Workplace and TU campaigns (4344)

Youth (1148)

Related websites

Youth Fight For Jobs

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition

National Shop Stewards Network

Tamil Solidarity

Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article  |email to friendemail to friend
From: The Socialist issue 156, 5 May 2000: Take Over Rover

Search site for keywords: Teachers - Education - Aaronovitch - Socialist Party - Socialist - Socialism - Performance-related - NUT

Tackling the propaganda

DAVID AARONOVITCH, a columnist for the Independent, launched a vitriolic attack on the teachers' strike decision. He concentrated on Socialist Party member Bob Sulatycki who closed the conference debate on performance-related pay. "Vengefully (since I don't appreciate threats to my children's education), I fed Mr Sulatycki into my search engine, and found him to be an occasional contributor to Socialism Today, the theoretical journal of no less an organisation than SPEW. Ha ha! Remember them, the Trotskyist Socialist party of England and Wales? No? Oh, never mind."
Aaronovitch would obviously be much better attacking government policies for disrupting his children's education as Bob Sulatycki replies below:

THE SAME old ritual every Easter - shoddy reporting of NUT Conference. Now it's David Aaronovitch's turn. He's been busy searching his Internet about me. So much less difficult than phoning to talk in person, when I could have told him "Yes, I have contributed to 'Socialism Today'. So what?"

Vengeance, apparently prompted by my participation in the Performance-Related Pay debate at NUT conference, motivated his trawl through cyber space. Why no vengeance towards David Blunkett? He's proposing to shut schools for two days, so that teachers learn to appreciate the benefits of his new schemes.

PRP and Performance Management are unfair, bureaucratic and overwhelmingly rejected by teachers. They will lead to a joyless saga of testing and form filling. Teachers will turn from colleagues into competitors, thereby undermining the trust and teamwork on which schools depend.

Now, obviously, that is only what teachers believe, and therefore won't cut much ice with Mr Aaronovitch. But many parents are aware that teacher dissatisfaction is leading to a flight from the classroom. Vacancies are at a ten-year high.

Teacher training course applications have plummeted.

Opposition to the Victorian Payment By Results system led to the creation of the NUT 130 years ago. It was a system that took over 30 years to replace. It was universally loathed and reviled by teachers. It created one of the most backward education systems in the then developed world. That is why delegates supported the statement

"If we don't strike on this, what do we strike on?" - a measure of the importance of PRP, not the triviality of strike action.

I hope that NUT members will see through the fog of misrepresentation, and vote against a system which will profoundly damage the job we still want to love, despite all the government's efforts.

This was published in The Independent on 2 May





Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Teachers:

triangle10 May sees united strike - but teacher unions shirk their responsibilities

triangleNUT Executive "shirks its responsibilites"

triangleMessage of support to the 10 May strikers

triangleBilborough College Nottingham strike Action over five-term years

triangleRotherham teachers stand up to bullying

triangleWorkplace news in brief

Education:

triangleOur education under attack

triangleLincolnshire academies in crisis

triangleGood result for Socialist Students candidates in NUS elections

triangleNUS conference Support for left and for action

Socialist Party:

triangleLiverpool Socialist Party: Marxist Economics

triangleLiverpool Socialist Party: A Marxist view of history

triangleBristol East Socialist Party: No Pasaran! Fighting the far right

Socialist:

triangleSolidarity with Greek workers

triangleTurning anger into action

triangleTrade Unionist and Socialist Coalition local election reports

Socialism:

triangle'Capitalism fails the poor' agree Oxford University students!

triangleJarrow marchers put forward an alternative

triangleVideos of speeches at Socialism 2011

NUT:

triangleStrike at Sussex Downs College

triangleSolidarity against far-right thugs

triangleThug attack won't stop anti-racist work