Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

Reports and Campaigns


spotAbout the Socialist Party

spotAnti-capitalism

spotAnti-privatisation

spotAnti-war

spotElection campaigns

spotEnvironment

spotHealth

spotSocialist women

spotWorkplace

spotYouth and Students

All keywords


Housing tags:

Accommodation (22)

Homeless (14)

Homelessness (13)

Households (12)

Housing (187)

Housing benefit (21)

Repossessions (7)

Tenants (38)


Reports and campaigns:

Anti-capitalism (603)

Anti-fascist (296)

Anti-racism (331)

Anti-war (670)

Asylum (82)

Black and Asian (179)

Children (134)

CNWP (108)

Corporate crime (2)

Disability (72)

Education (1832)

Election campaigns (784)

Environment (289)

Food (98)

Health and safety (8)

Health and welfare (88)

Housing (219)

Human Rights (166)

LGBT Pride (62)

Local government (946)

Local services (1304)

Low pay (106)

Migration (11)

Nationalisation (57)

New workers party (289)

NHS (782)

Pensions (430)

Post Office (114)

Poverty (239)

Privatisation (501)

Public Services (493)

Socialism (368)

Sport (61)

Stop the slaughter of Tamils (41)

Students (937)

The state (611)

Transport (250)

TUSC (137)

Welfare rights (288)

Women (280)

Workplace and TU campaigns (4050)

Youth (1062)

Related websites

Youth Fight For Jobs

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition

National Shop Stewards Network

Tamil Solidarity

Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article  |email to friendemail to friend
From: The Socialist issue 636, 1 September 2010: A fightback can stop cuts

Search site for keywords: Cuts - Households - Children - Budget

Cuts hit poor hardest

THE CON-Dem coalition claims that their 'progressive' cuts hit hardest at the rich and that they 'shield' poor families from the effects of austerity. The report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), gives the lie to this.

The IFS called Tory chancellor Osborne's emergency budget "clearly regressive" with cuts in welfare provision making working families on the lowest incomes - particularly those with children - the biggest losers.

They looked at proposed changes to housing benefit, disability allowances and tax credits pencilled in between today and 2015. They conclude that "they hit the poorest households more than those in the upper middle of income distribution in cash, let alone percentage, terms."

The poorest 10% of families could lose over 5% of their income as a result of the budget compared with a loss of under 1% for non-pensioner households without children in the richest 10% of households.

The rest of the population will face attacks on jobs and services. By the look of it, the only people to escape will be the ultra-rich and their friends, unless the working class movement steps up the fight.






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Cuts:

triangleLondon - a tale of two cities

trianglePrince Philip Hospital Llanelli: We can defeat cuts plans

triangleSave the NHS!

triangleLeeds Trinity students fight canteen cuts

triangleTower Hamlets: Save Rushmead one stop shop - fight all cuts

triangleSafe railways, not shopping malls

Households:

triangleClock turned back on housing

triangleDefend council tenants from eviction!

triangleWelfare Bill - Tories launch assault on the vulnerable

triangleVulnerable lose out on benefits

Children:

triangleManchester Sure Starts saved!

triangleSmacking not the answer

triangle'Save Manchester Sure Start' hosted conference

Budget:

triangleBelt-Tightening Brown Threatens Cutbacks

triangleBudget fuels determination to fight back!

triangleHuge protests against job insecurity