Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

Reports and Campaigns


spotAbout the Socialist Party

spotAnti-capitalism

spotAnti-privatisation

spotAnti-war

spotElection campaigns

spotEnvironment

spotHealth

spotSocialist women

spotWorkplace

spotYouth and Students

All keywords


Privatisation tags:

PFI (72)

PPP (17)

Privatisation (398)

Privatised (28)

Public-Private Partnership (4)

Trusts (31)


Reports and campaigns:

Anti-capitalism (603)

Anti-fascist (296)

Anti-racism (331)

Anti-war (670)

Asylum (82)

Black and Asian (179)

Children (134)

CNWP (108)

Corporate crime (2)

Disability (72)

Education (1832)

Election campaigns (784)

Environment (289)

Food (98)

Health and safety (8)

Health and welfare (88)

Housing (219)

Human Rights (166)

LGBT Pride (62)

Local government (946)

Local services (1304)

Low pay (106)

Migration (11)

Nationalisation (57)

New workers party (289)

NHS (782)

Pensions (430)

Post Office (114)

Poverty (239)

Privatisation (501)

Public Services (493)

Socialism (368)

Sport (61)

Stop the slaughter of Tamils (41)

Students (937)

The state (611)

Transport (250)

TUSC (137)

Welfare rights (288)

Women (280)

Workplace and TU campaigns (4050)

Youth (1062)

Related websites

Youth Fight For Jobs

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition

National Shop Stewards Network

Tamil Solidarity

Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article  |email to friendemail to friend
From: The Socialist issue 607, 13 January 2010: Decent jobs - not slave labour

Search site for keywords: Buses - Privatisation - Competition - Fares - Transport - Public transport

Buses - privatisation means worse services

The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has referred the UK bus industry to the Competition Commission because it has "evidence that limited competition between bus operators tends to result in higher prices and lower quality for bus users".

Alistair Tice

OFT's scrutiny of the UK bus market has found that the industry is dominated by nine operators. The big five, Stagecoach, FirstGroup, Arriva, Go-Ahead and National Express, control two-thirds of all local bus services.

OFT goes on to explain how this monopolisation has led to key routes or areas being dominated by a single company. Fares are about 9% higher where an operator faces limited competition. There are few bidders for "supported service" contracts such as partially subsidised rural routes. New entrants and smaller companies are being deterred by the "predatory behaviour" of incumbent/bigger operators.

Continued below ...


Watch Taken For A Ride video

Showing We Want our Buses Back demonstration and protests

... Continued

In fact, the OFT inquiry was prompted by the behaviour of Cardiff Bus forcing out a low-cost competitor '2 Travel'. Cardiff Bus set up a loss-making no-frills rival which undercut and forced 2 Travel out, then Cardiff Bus withdrew its own service!

So much for Thatcher's argument of competition improving services and driving down fares that she used when the Tories deregulated the bus industry in 1986 and broke up the National Bus Company. This led to cowboy competition with buses literally overtaking each other to get to the next stop to pick up passengers.

But as with the other public utilities that were privatised like rail, gas, electricity and water, all so-called competition has done is result in a handful of big companies profiteering from the industry whilst receiving huge public subsidies.

One-third of bus industry revenue (£1.2 billion) comes from the taxpayer, including £750 million for subsidised fares. Yet there is no public control of these private bus operators outside London and Northern Ireland. They can literally charge what they like and run where they like.

One of OFT's 'solutions' is more use of Quality Contracts. QCs allow local authorities to set fares and timetables for routes or areas which private operators then bid for, similar to London. But so far, not one Passenger Transport Authority has applied for a Quality Contract. Legislation under the Local Transport Act which comes into force this month is supposed to make it easier for local authorities to obtain QCs. However, the Tories have said that they will abolish it if they win the election.

Whilst any form of regulation is to be welcomed, the recent 20% hike in London bus fares by Tory Mayor Boris Johnson shows how little public control there really is. Private operators will only bid for the contracts if they are guaranteed enough profit (£326 million in 2007/08) and the big five's monopoly has local authorities over a barrel.

Only by taking the bus industry back into public ownership, with local services democratically run by councils, bus workers and passengers, as part of an integrated public transport system, will fares be cut and services improved.

Then public transport can become a more attractive alternative to the car, thus reducing congestion and pollution.






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Buses:

triangleWorkplace news in brief

triangleLondon bus workers fight cuts

triangleTekel workers brutally attacked by police

triangleSouth Yorkshire Buses Demonstration

triangleNo more fare rises, no more cutbacks!

triangleLondon bus workers strike

Privatisation:

triangleSave the NHS!

triangleRemploy workers fight privatisation

triangleHMRC workers strike back against privatisation

trianglePCS members in HMRC strike on 31 January

Competition:

triangleNHS "listening events" - Flip chart 'democracy'

triangleGuadeloupe - End the profiteering and exploitation

triangleCut throat competition threatens NHS

Fares:

triangleSave our Railways: rally and lobby of parliament

trianglePrivate rail companies - a licence to print money

trianglePrivate railways rip off fares

Transport:

triangleSafe railways, not shopping malls

triangleDebate: Should socialists support the HS2 rail line?

triangleLondon Docklands transport workers win Olympics deal

Public transport:

trianglePlanning and the environment

triangleFor decent public transport!