Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

Reports and Campaigns


spotAbout the Socialist Party

spotAnti-capitalism

spotAnti-privatisation

spotAnti-war

spotElection campaigns

spotEnvironment

spotHealth

spotSocialist women

spotWorkplace

spotYouth and Students

All keywords


Socialism tags:

Planned economy (15)

Public ownership (26)

Socialism (261)

Working-class (92)


Reports and campaigns:

Anti-capitalism (642)

Anti-fascist (310)

Anti-racism (346)

Anti-war (741)

Asylum (86)

Black and Asian (189)

Children (153)

CNWP (108)

Corporate crime (2)

Disability (82)

Education (1958)

Election campaigns (880)

Environment (303)

Food (104)

Health and safety (9)

Health and welfare (100)

Housing (247)

Human Rights (179)

LGBT Pride (67)

Local government (1016)

Local services (1462)

Low pay (109)

Migration (11)

Nationalisation (58)

New workers party (296)

NHS (847)

Pensions (487)

Post Office (116)

Poverty (252)

Privatisation (530)

Public Services (524)

Socialism (382)

Sport (70)

Stop the slaughter of Tamils (46)

Students (983)

The state (662)

Transport (266)

TUSC (209)

Welfare rights (314)

Women (309)

Workplace and TU campaigns (4344)

Youth (1148)

Related websites

Youth Fight For Jobs

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition

National Shop Stewards Network

Tamil Solidarity

Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article  |email to friendemail to friend
From: The Socialist issue 648, 23 November 2010: Youth Fight for Education: No cuts, no fees, save EMA!

Search site for keywords: Care Homes - Public ownership - Privatisation

Profiting from the most vulnerable

FRAIL OLD people living in homes run by Southern Cross Healthcare (SCH), Britain's biggest provider of private nursing homes for old people, pay £473 a month on average for the privilege, some pay £2,000. But many SCH homes are substandard and often dangerous - industry watchdog CQC has stuck a 'zero' rating on 19 of them.

Roger Shrives

Property dealings by SCH's greedy former private equity owners left it with huge bills that it cannot pay. Trying to buy more and more nursing homes, and making millions for its directors, its owners could not repay expensive loans from other business sharks.

In 2008 its shares lost a quarter of their value. Labour, then in government, let private owners keep control of the nursing homes. Two years later their shares are even lower and the company, desperate to be profitable, spends less and less on the homes and the staff.

Why didn't Labour take these private nursing homes into public ownership when they first showed signs of collapsing? Privatisation of care services puts profit first and leaves vulnerable people living in shocking conditions.

Why should there be a commercial market in 'care' for defenceless old people? Who runs these homes and decides on priorities for the aged? Southern Cross and other private care homes should be taken into public ownership, either within the NHS or as part of a well-financed local authority social services department. Defending public services is clearly a life or death issue.






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Care Homes:

triangleThem & Us

triangleDefend care services in Medway

triangleWho cares about home care?

triangleNational Pensioners Convention parliament

triangleSouthern Cross bosses demand huge cuts in pay and conditions

triangleNews in brief

Public ownership:

triangleWhy BP should be nationalised

triangleSocialism

triangleHow to stop cuts and defend public services

triangleNo more fare rises, no more cutbacks!

Privatisation:

triangle'Save Heatherwood Hospital' campaign yielding results

triangleVictory for Greenwich Unite library campaign

triangleExposed: the dirty world of NHS privatisation