Reports and Campaigns

spotAbout the Socialist Party

spotAnti-capitalism

spotAnti-privatisation

spotAnti-war

spotElection campaigns

spotEnvironment

spotHealth

spotSocialist women

spotWorkplace

spotYouth and Students

All keywords


Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Transport keywords:

Buses (77)

Car industry (35)

Chrysler (2)

Cycling (5)

Cyclists (4)

Fares (52)

Fords (8)

Franchises (5)

GM (20)

Public transport (52)

Rail (263)

Railtrack (10)

Transport (215)

Travel (23)


Reports and campaigns:

Anti-capitalism (1237)

Anti-fascist (561)

Anti-racism (704)

Anti-war (1488)

Asylum (211)

Black and Asian (394)

Children (377)

CNWP (108)

Corporate crime (2)

Disability (201)

Education (3914)

Election campaigns (2448)

Environment (608)

EU (450)

Finance (99)

Food (270)

Health and safety (33)

Health and welfare (315)

Housing (1036)

Human Rights (380)

LGBT Pride (143)

Local government (2180)

Local services (3658)

Low pay (509)

Migration (56)

Nationalisation (145)

New workers party (467)

NHS (1842)

Pensions (701)

Post Office (222)

Poverty (573)

Privatisation (1017)

Public Services (1131)

Socialism (872)

Socialist (43)

Sport (196)

Stop the slaughter of Tamils (90)

Students (1829)

The state (1368)

Transport (551)

TUSC (999)

Welfare rights (716)

Women (763)

Workplace and TU campaigns (8261)

Youth (1966)

Related websites

Youth Fight For Jobs

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition

National Shop Stewards Network

Tamil Solidarity


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article
From: The Socialist issue 945, 19 April 2017: Tories out!

Search site for keywords: Buses - Transport - Public transport - Workers - London - Drivers - Parents

Reader's comment: public transport

Buses and buggies: a driver speaks

London bus, photo Graham Richardson (Creative Commons)

London bus, photo Graham Richardson (Creative Commons)   (Click to enlarge)

'Alfred Babcock', bus driver, London

Angry letters in free London newspaper Metro this January asserted the rights of bus passengers with baby buggies. Other irate letters demanded priority for wheelchair users. This cacophony echoed the real arguments I hear on the bus I drive.

Wheelchair user Doug Paulley originally went to court after he was refused entry to a Yorkshire FirstGroup bus in 2012 when a mother with a pushchair refused to move. The Supreme Court eventually ruled that bus drivers are responsible for pressuring other passengers to move if a wheelchair user can't get on.

Heated

A dispute between a wheelchair user and a person with a buggy can generally be resolved amicably - especially when passengers realise my bus isn't moving until it is. But when things get more heated you really need a quiet word with the people involved to calm things down and resolve the matter.

Ironically, the people who could do that - conductors - were phased out as low-floor, wheelchair-accessible buses came to London.

I'm not allowed to leave the cab and I've no powers of enforcement - so how am I expected to sort out a dispute five metres behind me which I may not even be able to see?

Once the argument's over, if I still can't fit the wheelchair, I have to call the controller before I leave the stop. This seldom elicits a rapid reply from the controller. But understandably, it does provoke rapid enquiries from passengers as to why the bus is not moving.

And at a later stage I'll get questions from the controllers about why my bus is late. Meanwhile, management forces us to drive busy buses in heavy traffic up to the legal maximum five and a half hours without a break.

It's time to look at the bigger picture. Workers and poor people who use public transport shouldn't have to squabble with each other. Wheelchair users, parents with buggies and bus drivers are not enemies.

What we need is a massive expansion of public transport so there's room for all. Public services should be taken away from the private profiteers.

We need a party that represents the 99% which can fight against budget cuts and for public ownership.

The lorry driver unloading cases of burgers outside McDonald's and blocking my bus stop is another example of unplanned capitalism blindly setting workers against each other. It's not the lorry driver's fault.

In a planned socialist society, pensioners wouldn't need to get on buses with big trolleys they can hardly lift. They wouldn't need to go miles to the nearest supermarket because local shops have been pushed out of business and the ones that are left cost the earth.

A socialist society could bring many workers a shorter working week with no loss of pay so people wouldn't have to rush about so much. Then passengers and transport workers wouldn't be constantly put in situations where they find themselves in conflict.






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Buses:

triangleArriva bus drivers' action wins pay rise

triangleHuge support for strikes of bus drivers and train guards

triangleArriva North West bus drivers strike over pay

triangleLondon Buses safety campaign

Transport:

triangleArriva bus strikers stand firm

triangleNationalise rail now

triangleThe Socialist Inbox

triangleIreland: rail workers demand share of 'recovery'

Public transport:

triangleWhat we saw

triangleShould you be furious about 'furious cycling'?

triangleTransport strategy: London's mayor is no visionary

Workers:

triangleSupport the Crossrail Woolwich walkout

triangle110 years ago: massacre at Santa Maria school in Chile - commemorate 21 December 1907

London:

triangleSix months on - still no justice for Grenfell

Drivers:

triangleNorth West: drivers and housing workers escalate strike wave

Parents:

triangleTwo in five 'right to buy' homes now for let