The Socialist 15 April 2009

MPs' snouts in the expenses trough

Sri Lanka: Stop the war - fight for democratic rights

Stop the war in Sri Lanka: Protest at India House

European elections: Why No2EU?

Visteon workers angry and determined

National Union of Teachers conference: Battle on workload begins

London Underground: Set a new strike date

Fury at John Lewis' trickery

Preparing to fight probation meltdown

Youth Fight for Jobs: What next to build the campaign?

The Spanish Civil War: Defeat snatched from the jaws of victory

Deceptive denigration of Lindsey strike

G20 Summit death: Bring the cops to account

Council manoeuvres in Lewisham hit school children

Parents occupy schools in Glasgow to stop closures

Fast news

Thailand: Battles erupt on the streets of Bangkok

Moldova: Thousands storm parliament buildings as economic crisis worsens

Rugby league: In League with big business?

Previous issues, etc

Print this issue




Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/575/7172

Google search the site	Printable version	email to friend

Home | The Socialist 15 April 2009 | Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe | Donate | Bookshop

Council manoeuvres in Lewisham hit school children

Ian Page and Chris Flood Lewisham Socialist Party councillors, photo Socialist Party

AT LEWISHAM council's recent Annual General Meeting, the two Socialist Party councillors Ian Page and myself put forward an emergency motion. This is not usual for an AGM but this was a genuine emergency.

Chris Flood, Lewisham Socialist party councillor

Lewisham Bridge Primary School was scheduled for a temporary move over Easter after the council decided to demolish the school to build a new 'through school' for 3-16 year olds. Thames Water, the Environment Agency and other bodies had criticised the council's current plans and even said the land for the temporary school site was contaminated!

Ian and I argued that moving children to a temporary site, before these issues were resolved (and before planning permission had been awarded!) was wrong. With so many uncertainties it was unacceptable to move children as young as four, requiring families to put them on a bus every morning, to go to a 'temporary' school site for two years.

The motion argued that the council should halt the school 'decant' until all the investigations needed were done. The council's legal department gave out 'advice' that councillors should mind how they vote as it could debar them from voting when the plans come to any of the planning committees; a perfect excuse for establishment parties to hide behind.

The motion said that the council should recognise that children's interests would be damaged by the decant now. Nothing could be done with the existing site for the next few months, due to necessary further assessments, so why move the school now?

Parents are drawing the conclusion that council officers are pushing this project forward at any cost. The children would end up being moved days before SATs assessments.

The Labour group, backed by the Greens and Tories, used a bureaucratic ruling (agreed between themselves before the meeting!) to propose moving to the next item on the council agenda to avoid a vote on the motion.

This cynical wrecking tactic stifled debate in the council chamber. I spoke on the issues as the motion proposer. The other groups spinelessly voted to move to the next item.

Two angry parents confronted the Green councillors after the meeting for not supporting the parents and teachers and for doing a deal with the Tories and New Labour 'outside' the chamber. One Green councillor said he was also concerned over the site's contamination because of the effects on toads. Parents reminded him that their primary concern was for the children's welfare.

We pointed out that if the six Green council seats in Lewisham had been won as part of an overall left alternative at the last election, along with the Socialist councillors, then the council chamber could have had a very different result that night. This shows yet again the need for a new workers' alliance and a new workers' party.

In this issue

MPs' snouts in the expenses trough