The Socialist 27 May 2009

Protest at MPs' sleaze

Protest at MPs' sleaze: Vote No2EU - Yes to Democracy

No2EU - yes to Democracy: Who's standing and why you should vote for them

Fight for real democracy!

Hear No2EU - Yes to Democracy speakers

Fiddling Tory MP Mackay resigns

UKIP - yet another establishment party

BNP fail to win Salford election

Youth Fight for Jobs: Fortnight of action 27 June to 10 July

School students organised strikes

Construction workers: battle won but war not over

Strike success at Lindsey Oil Refinery and Conoco

An action plan for all construction sites

Diary of a Lindsey Oil Refinery shop steward

Southampton protest: Stop the slaughter of Tamils

Latvia: 'A capitalist inferno'

Kashmir health workers' victory

Nanjing college students in clashes with police

PCS conference: Preparing for future battles

Delegates' anger at Public and Commercial Services union conference

Young members' voices heard at PCS conference

Wales TUC conference - no good news for New Labour

National Shop Stewards Network conference

Anger at council school closures

Lewisham Bridge primary school

Why we must Stop the Strip!

"Dump cuts not elderly"

Previous issues, etc

Print this issue




Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/581/7349

Google search the site	Printable version	email to friend

Home | The Socialist 27 May 2009 | Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe | Donate | Bookshop

Lewisham Bridge primary

THE TWO Socialist Party councillors on Lewisham council, Ian Page and myself, put a motion to the 20 May council meeting to delay the move of pupils from Lewisham Bridge primary school, which is threatened with closure.

Chris Flood, Socialist Party councillor

Planning permission for the new school building on the same site had not yet been awarded and there were many outstanding concerns. Thames Water think there may not be sufficient water for the new proposed school for 4-16 year olds.

There were also concerns about the land possibly being contaminated. With all these uncertainties unsolved, why move the children?

Our earlier council motion said that this early decant to another site, presumably to allow the council to demolish the building, was totally unnecessary and disruptive.

However the Greens, New Labour and the Tories in the council chamber made sure then that our item was not discussed.

Only days later English Heritage 'listed' the Lewisham Bridge school building, adding further delay to the council's proposed plans. Scandalously the Cabinet and Mayor knew of English Heritage's intention but didn't share this with either the council or the public in case our council motion went through!

The embarrassed Greens now say they are not happy either with the lack of information volunteered to them. But they failed to redeem themselves at the 20 May meeting. Ian and myself argued that the uncertainties could lead to the children being in a temporary school site for years. Surely it would be better to move the children back to the old site until a clear decision could be made?

Only the Socialist Party supported this. All the other parties now want a new school at any cost, even if it is an overcrowded PFI-built school, on contaminated land, with an inadequate water supply!

The Socialist Party is the only party in the council chamber to argue consistently for the needs of pupils, parents and staff in Lewisham. Clearly the public gallery agreed. Some very upset parents heckled the New Labour administration so much that the council meeting had to be adjourned for a period.

In this issue

Protest at MPs' sleaze: Vote No2EU - Yes to Democracy