The Socialist 8 August 2012 Our health, not their wealth!  End the insane cycle of youth joblessness March together on 20 October and then strike together to stop all cuts Sean Rigg inquest: damning verdict for police Gove sneaking unqualified teachers into academies Views on the Olympics and the opening ceremony Transport 'customer experience' staff still fighting for Olympics bonus Vote No in Unison's local government pension scheme ballot Swansea DVLA staff protest at embarrassment of job cuts Support Churchill cleaners, Tyne & Wear Metro Interview with Southampton rebel councillors TUSC: Keeping up the pressure on the austerity parties Socialist Students organise to fight fees and cuts Workers win Wales Austerity Games despite bosses moving the goalposts! Growing resistance to NHS cuts shown in Redditch Portsmouth fans fight to save Fratton Park Brighton pensioner jailed for non-payment of council tax Welsh Labour: Red flag or white flag? Obituary: Frank Mills, 1939 - 2012 Syria: Is there an alternative to the developing civil war? Markets force savage austerity measures on Spanish workers Trial resumes of Kazakhstan human rights activist |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Home | The Socialist 8 August 2012 | Join the Socialist Party Vote No in Unison's local government pension scheme ballotA Unison memberUnison members in local government are being subjected to an avalanche of material from the union leadership, urging us to vote to accept the new pension deal, LGPS 2014. The ballot ends on 24 August. What are they afraid of? They are scared that the members might get to hear an alternative point of view, that once they hear the actual facts that we will still be working longer, paying more and getting less, the members might actually vote to reject. In one day I received five different emails and a text message from the union, plus the front page of the national website also urges a Yes vote. The ballot paper arrived accompanied by another letter, also promoting a Yes vote. It is bad enough, if not unexpected, that our elected leadership voted to recommend a Yes vote. The momentum that was created from the success of the 30 November strike was wasted, as the Unison leadership and others went in to negotiations with the government. They left PCS, UCU, NUT to fight on their own. But now we are being instructed by unelected officials in the union that branches can't campaign for a No vote, nor can stewards or members, even if the branch position was to reject the deal. Whole branches have been threatened with disciplinary action for allegedly breaking rules, when in fact, it has been the unelected officialdom that has been breaking rules. Despite the threats we won't be silent. We are accountable to our fellow members, not the likes of general secretary Dave Prentis. That is why we have been campaigning for a No vote, through producing leaflets, posters, even our own text messages linking up stewards opposed to the deal. Whatever the result will be, and it will be hard to beat the tidal wave for a Yes vote coming from the top, the fight will remain to reclaim Unison for the members. We say No because...Most people will still work longer. For those under the age of 55 the normal retirement age will rise in line with the new state pension age, with some having to work to 70. Most will still get less because pensions will only be uprated with the lower CPI inflation rate rather than RPI. Also the final salary scheme is to be replaced with a career average scheme. In 2006 Unison members fought to keep this and opposed the career average scheme. Most workers earn more in their last years of work. Many will pay more. They say only workers earning over £43,000 will see a contributions increase. But some earning under £20,000 will pay more. Also we've been paying more for the last four years and had no pay rise for three of those. There are some improvements:Part time staff will now pay contributions based on actual earnings, not the full time equivalent. Staff transferring to the private sector can remain in the scheme from April 2014. But it's not clear who will pay for this, councils or the companies. Save now - lose later. There will now be a 50/50 option. Effectively you can pay half the monthly contribution rate and get half the benefits. The future costs of the scheme are yet to be resolved. This is a recipe for "vote now, pay more later". In this issue Socialist Party news and analysis
London Olympics
Socialist Party workplace news
Socialist Party reports and campaigns
International socialist news and analysis
Home | The Socialist 8 August 2012 | Join the Socialist Party |
Related links:
| |||||||||||||||
Google search the site
Printable version
email to friend
