Tessa Jowell and government sleaze:

Corruption and lies

In the wake of the financial and extra-curricular shennanigans of
Peter Mandelson, David Blunkett, and the gongs handed out to
millionaires for services rendered, now comes the creeping hint of
sleaze linking David Mills, the husband of government minister Tessa
Jowell, with Silvio Berlusconi, Italy’s extreme right-wing prime
minister.

Tony Mulhearn, Liverpool

It is by now an all too familiar scenario involving New Labour, whose
chief advocate Blair judges success not by how society can be organised
to raise the level of culture and well-being of the majority, but by how
rich you are and, particularly, how many CEOs [chief executive officers]
can enrich themselves by diddling the taxpayer through buying privatised
public services at knock-down prices.

Tessa Jowell naturally denies that she acted improperly by raising
£300,000 against their property so Mills could take advantage of an
investment opportunity that had opened up, after all working folk do
that sort of thing every day of the week. Mills denies charges in Italy
that he received £350,000 from Berlusconi in return for evidence he
gave in his support in an earlier corruption trial.

Mills says the amount of money identified in his bank was payment
from millionaire shipping magnate Diego Attanasio for his services.
Attanasio claims he was in prison at the time.

In this maze of charges and denials, and the demand by the Tories for
an investigation into Jowell’s complicity, it’s a case of the
crocodiles battling with the alligators. And, unlike Blair and his
friend Bush and the obscenities of Belmarsh and Guantanamo, I believe
people are innocent until proved guilty. But, irrespective of the
outcome of these proceedings, the fact of Mills’ link with Berlusconi
and a crooked shipping magnate is not in dispute, nor the raising of an
amount by Jowell and Mills which coincides with the amount of the
alleged bribe.

Once again an oil slick of sleaze and corruption oozes towards the
heart of New Labour. Further evidence, if any more was needed, of the
need for a new party of the working class.