Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

spotInternational figures

spotLabour Party figures

spotLefts

spotMiscellaneous

spotNationalists

spotOther UK politicans

spotSocialist Party and CWI public figures

spotTory figures

spotTrade union figures

spotWriters and artists


All keywords


Lefts tags:

Alex Gordon (22)

Aneurin Bevan (2)

Arthur Miller (1)

Che Guevara (8)

Cindy Sheehan (9)

Evo Morales (10)

George Galloway (17)

George Monbiot (5)

Hugo Chávez (31)

J Edgar Hoover (1)

Jack Jones (1)

Kautsky (1)

Lefts (1)

Mark Thomas (5)

Martin Luther King (1)

Montgomery Bus Boycott (1)

Ralph Nader (8)

Ricky Tomlinson (9)

Sylvia Pankhurst (1)

Tariq Ali (1)

Tommy Sheridan (66)

Tony Benn (5)

Alex Gordon


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article  |email to friendemail to friend
From: The Socialist issue 655, 26 January 2011: Workers and students unite!

Search site for keywords: Anti-union laws - RMT - Strike - Alex Gordon

RMT leader slams anti-union laws

Alex Gordon, president of the RMT transport union, explained to delegates at the recent National Shop Stewards Committee how the anti-union laws were being used to frustrate industrial action by workers.

"A new judgement in the High Court in London against my union [the RMT] has raised a new obstacle to workers lawfully engaging in collective industrial action. The case of Serco/Docklands Light Railway v RMT has highlighted yet again the inadequacy of the current strike laws and their ability to be 'interpreted' by judges in ways that were inconceivable a few years ago.

This week a judge found that the 'language' used by my union in notifying the employer of strike action was unlawful. In particular he drew attention to the RMT's use of the word "audit" to describe the method by which it had arrived at a true and reliable record of its members on DLR who we called on to take industrial action after a 80% 'Yes' vote.

The judge said that "audit" implied an outside third party overseeing the membership records. Effectively this judgement puts us on the road to some sort of corporate state overseeing of union membership systems.

Even more worryingly the judge agreed to the employers' arguments that the union should allow the employer to have oversight of every single detail of correspondence and email between union representatives and officers that led up to the strike ballot.

The reason these judgements are appearing now is of course entirely connected with the massive fight that looms over public sector cuts."






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Anti-union laws:

triangleFighting pension cuts and the anti-union laws

triangleCoventry trade unionists condemn anti-strike comments

triangleFighting the anti-strike legislation

triangleNo to the anti-trade union laws

triangleWe're backing TUSC

triangleRail unions win over anti-strike laws

RMT:

triangleInterview with RMT assistant general secretary candidate

trianglePublic meetings against cuts in the rail industry

triangleLondon elections - TUSC: A marker for future struggles

triangleTube Lines - Striking for equality of rights and against privatisation!

Strike:

triangleStrike at Sussex Downs College

triangleCome to the 6th annual NSSN conference!

triangleSecond strike by Tilbury dockers over attack on contracts

Alex Gordon:

triangleTUSC: the electoral alternative to the parties of the rich

triangleLondon, Hackney TUSC election rally

triangleLondon, Lambeth TUSC election meeting