spotInternational figures

spotLabour Party figures




spotOther UK politicans

spotSocialist Party and CWI public figures

spotTory figures

spotTrade union figures


spotWriters and artists

All keywords

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Lefts keywords:

Aboriginal (1)

Alex Gordon (26)

Aneurin Bevan (4)

Arthur Miller (2)

Che Guevara (18)

Cindy Sheehan (9)

Evo Morales (10)

George Galloway (23)

George Monbiot (5)

Hugo Chávez (31)

J Edgar Hoover (1)

Jack Jones (1)

John Pilger (3)

Kautsky (2)

Lefts (3)

Mark Thomas (5)

Martin Luther King (15)

Montgomery Bus Boycott (1)

Owen Jones (4)

Ralph Nader (9)

Ricky Tomlinson (14)

Sylvia Pankhurst (4)

Tariq Ali (1)

Tommy Sheridan (88)

Tony Benn (15)

Alex Gordon

Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article
From: The Socialist issue 655, 26 January 2011: Workers and students unite!

Search site for keywords: Anti-union laws - RMT - Strike - Alex Gordon

RMT leader slams anti-union laws

Alex Gordon, president of the RMT transport union, explained to delegates at the recent National Shop Stewards Committee how the anti-union laws were being used to frustrate industrial action by workers.

"A new judgement in the High Court in London against my union [the RMT] has raised a new obstacle to workers lawfully engaging in collective industrial action. The case of Serco/Docklands Light Railway v RMT has highlighted yet again the inadequacy of the current strike laws and their ability to be 'interpreted' by judges in ways that were inconceivable a few years ago.

This week a judge found that the 'language' used by my union in notifying the employer of strike action was unlawful. In particular he drew attention to the RMT's use of the word "audit" to describe the method by which it had arrived at a true and reliable record of its members on DLR who we called on to take industrial action after a 80% 'Yes' vote.

The judge said that "audit" implied an outside third party overseeing the membership records. Effectively this judgement puts us on the road to some sort of corporate state overseeing of union membership systems.

Even more worryingly the judge agreed to the employers' arguments that the union should allow the employer to have oversight of every single detail of correspondence and email between union representatives and officers that led up to the strike ballot.

The reason these judgements are appearing now is of course entirely connected with the massive fight that looms over public sector cuts."

Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Anti-union laws:

triangleRoyal Mail bosses block strike - back postal workers

triangleTories weak: time for the TUC to act

triangleConference opens debate on Labour and pledges to fight anti-union laws

triangleKick out the Tories: For a Corbyn-led government

triangleJeremy Corbyn's workers' charter


triangleRMT strikes against driver-only operation continue

triangleRMT rail members buoyed by coordinated action

triangleStrike against driver-only operation on five rail networks

triangleAnti-DOO lobby of Liverpool's transport committee


triangleWorkplace news in brief

triangleHackney school cleaners strike

triangleHome care workers to strike

Alex Gordon:

triangleThe role of the RMT in changing Labour

triangleLancaster public meeting: a century of war