spotInternational figures

spotLabour Party figures

spotLefts

spotMiscellaneous

spotNationalists

spotOther UK politicans

spotSocialist Party and CWI public figures

spotTory figures

spotTrade union figures

spotWriters and artists


All keywords


Miscellaneous tags:

Evictions (13)

Kelvin McKenzie (1)

Leveson (4)

Obituary (10)

Queen (5)

Royal Family (4)

Royals (1)

Stephen Lawrence (8)

Teachers (263)

Travellers (4)

Miscellaneous


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article  |email to friendemail to friend
From: The Socialist issue 668, 27 April 2011: Fight the cuts: Vote for a socialist alternative

Search site for keywords: Royal Family - Monarchy - Royals

Not much bread but there's plenty of circuses

Anti-Monarchy Protesters against the Royal Wedding, photo Paul Mattsson

Anti-Monarchy Protesters against the Royal Wedding, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

Derek McMillan, Our Royal Correspondent

The Roman Emperors dealt with economic crisis with a policy of 'bread and circuses'. The Con-Dems are determined to leave out the bread and just give us the circuses. Witness the media torrent of sickly sentimentality over the royal wedding.

Much has been made of Premier Cameron's deliberations over whether he looks better as a lounge lizard or a stuffed shirt. Serious stuff. It makes Cameron look a fool which is no bad thing but it diverts attention from the realities of the state of the Con-Dem Nation.

Royal Family

Anti-Monarchy Protesters against the Royal Wedding, photo Paul Mattsson

Anti-Monarchy Protesters against the Royal Wedding, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

We should be grateful that, although the country cannot afford health, welfare, education, libraries or pensions, at least we can afford for two over-privileged parasites to live like pigs in clover. It's romantic isn't it?

And of course the media Royal Correspondents stress that Middleton is "a commoner". About as common as hen's teeth in fact. The Middletons are from an elite, every bit as remote from the 'common people' as the Windsors.

Anti-Monarchy Protesters against the Royal Wedding, photo Paul Mattsson

Anti-Monarchy Protesters against the Royal Wedding, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

The significance of "blue blood" is that in the past the royals and the aristos had pale skin because they did not work outside like the peasantry so their blue veins were more likely to be visible. None of the millionaire Middletons has to turn an honest day's work and indeed they look to expand their business empire with their royal connections.

On the other hand it is important for the Windsors to bring new blue blood into the family as is all too evident in Prince Charles and Prince Philip. Daft as a pair of Poundland brushes.

So watch the royal circus and enjoy it. After all you paid for it!






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter



Related links:

Royal Family:

triangleMonarchy - not just a 'harmless relic'

triangleReview: The monarchy - reserve weapon of the ruling class?

triangleRoyals down to their last crown?

Monarchy:

triangleA royal debate in Lincoln

triangleNewcastle-under-Lyme Socialist Party: What do socialists say about the monarchy?

triangleLiverpool Socialist Party: The monarchy

triangleBristol Central Socialist Party: The role of the monarchy in capitalist society