Handheld users: view this page better on http://m.socialistparty.org.uk

spotInternational figures

spotLabour Party figures

spotLefts

spotMiscellaneous

spotNationalists

spotOther UK politicans

spotSocialist Party and CWI public figures

spotTory figures

spotTrade union figures

spotWriters and artists


All keywords


Socialist Party and CWI public figures tags:

Brian Debus (23)

Chris Flood (40)

Clare Daly (16)

Dave Nellist (125)

Glenn Kelly (42)

Hannah Sell (55)

Ian Page (39)

Jackie Grunsell (40)

Jane Aitchison (3)

Janice Godrich (14)

Joe Higgins (69)

John McInally (36)

Len Hockey (5)

Macreadie (4)

Martin Powell-Davies (41)

Onay Kasab (48)

Paul Couchman (3)

Paul Murphy (8)

Peter Taaffe (95)

Rob Williams (41)

Rob Windsor (34)

Robbie Segal (13)

Roger Bannister (35)

Steve Hedley (2)

Suzanne Muna (17)

Ted Grant (1)

Terry Fields (7)

Tony Mulhearn (46)

Tony Saunois (6)

Ian Page


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article  |email to friendemail to friend
From: The Socialist issue 575, 15 April 2009: MPs' snouts in the expenses trough

Search site for keywords: Lewisham - School - Council - Children - Socialist Party - Chris Flood - Ian Page

Council manoeuvres in Lewisham hit school children

Ian Page and Chris Flood Lewisham Socialist Party councillors, photo Socialist Party

Ian Page and Chris Flood Lewisham Socialist Party councillors, photo Socialist Party

AT LEWISHAM council's recent Annual General Meeting, the two Socialist Party councillors Ian Page and myself put forward an emergency motion. This is not usual for an AGM but this was a genuine emergency.

Chris Flood, Lewisham Socialist party councillor

Lewisham Bridge Primary School was scheduled for a temporary move over Easter after the council decided to demolish the school to build a new 'through school' for 3-16 year olds. Thames Water, the Environment Agency and other bodies had criticised the council's current plans and even said the land for the temporary school site was contaminated!

Ian and I argued that moving children to a temporary site, before these issues were resolved (and before planning permission had been awarded!) was wrong. With so many uncertainties it was unacceptable to move children as young as four, requiring families to put them on a bus every morning, to go to a 'temporary' school site for two years.

The motion argued that the council should halt the school 'decant' until all the investigations needed were done. The council's legal department gave out 'advice' that councillors should mind how they vote as it could debar them from voting when the plans come to any of the planning committees; a perfect excuse for establishment parties to hide behind.

The motion said that the council should recognise that children's interests would be damaged by the decant now. Nothing could be done with the existing site for the next few months, due to necessary further assessments, so why move the school now?

Parents are drawing the conclusion that council officers are pushing this project forward at any cost. The children would end up being moved days before SATs assessments.

The Labour group, backed by the Greens and Tories, used a bureaucratic ruling (agreed between themselves before the meeting!) to propose moving to the next item on the council agenda to avoid a vote on the motion.

This cynical wrecking tactic stifled debate in the council chamber. I spoke on the issues as the motion proposer. The other groups spinelessly voted to move to the next item.

Two angry parents confronted the Green councillors after the meeting for not supporting the parents and teachers and for doing a deal with the Tories and New Labour 'outside' the chamber. One Green councillor said he was also concerned over the site's contamination because of the effects on toads. Parents reminded him that their primary concern was for the children's welfare.

We pointed out that if the six Green council seats in Lewisham had been won as part of an overall left alternative at the last election, along with the Socialist councillors, then the council chamber could have had a very different result that night. This shows yet again the need for a new workers' alliance and a new workers' party.






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

email to friend email to friend

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Lewisham:

triangleThug attack won't stop anti-racist work

triangleLondon, Lewisham TUSC election rally

triangleFight or privatise: A tale of two councils

triangleProtests saying 'no' to slave labour workfare

triangleLewisham Socialist Party: What next after 30th November?

triangleLewisham Socialist Party and YFJ: London youth erupt - Fight for jobs and services

School:

triangleLincolnshire academies in crisis

triangleRotherham teachers stand up to bullying

triangleSwinton teachers strike against job losses

triangleGreater London Assembly election

Council:

triangleCouncil workers in Cheshire strike against attacks on pay

triangleVictory for Greenwich Unite library campaign

triangleGreenwich libraries - fighting back can win

Children:

triangleCon-Dems' hypocrisy over children's care

triangleOur education under attack

triangleRochdale: far right attempts to exploit tragedy of abuse

Socialist Party:

triangleLiverpool Socialist Party: Marxist Economics

triangleLiverpool Socialist Party: A Marxist view of history

triangleBristol East Socialist Party: No Pasaran! Fighting the far right

Chris Flood:

triangleA socialist alternative

Ian Page:

triangleKeep Deptford Jobcentre open!