Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

From The Socialist newspaper, 19 January 2011

National Shop Stewards Network conference 22 January

Discussing an NSSN anti-cuts campaign

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

In the debates and discussions that have taken place in the run up to the NSSN special anti-cuts conference on 22 January, a number of assumptions and misunderstandings have been raised in meetings around the country and also circulated on the internet.
The Socialist interviewed two Socialist Party members who are also NSSN officers, Bill Mullins (NSSN co-organiser) and Rob Williams (NSSN vice-chair) to explain some of the facts and differences that have arisen.

1. At its special conference this Saturday, 22 January, the National Shop Stewards Network is discussing a proposal to launch an anti-cuts campaign., Why has this proposal been made?

The NSSN is uniquely placed to launch an effective anti-cuts campaign, as it is a national organisation that is based on trade union and workplace representatives across all unions.

Over the Christmas period, warning notices of redundancy were sent by local authorities to 118,000 council workers. The best way to defeat cuts of this magnitude, and all the other cuts that the Con-Dem government is intent on carrying through, will be by the trade unions preparing for coordinated strike action, linking up with the local community-based anti-cuts campaigns.

As the NSSN has a base in workplaces, it is in a very strong position to help draw together the anti-cuts campaigning of trade unionists with that of local communities, students, other young people etc.

The NSSN already has a record of organising successful anti-cuts events, including the first conference that took place after Osborne's initial budget cuts were announced, a lobby of the last TUC congress in Manchester and helping to organise several regional anti-cuts demonstrations on 23 October 2010.

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson

Photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

2. Critics of the proposal have said that there are already two national anti-cuts bodies in existence, the Coalition of Resistance (CoR) and Right to Work (RtW), and unity is paramount. What would you say on this issue?

We are in favour of unity, but at present there are important political and organisational differences within the anti-cuts movement that need to be discussed and debated.

In particular, we need a national anti-cuts campaign that opposes ALL cuts, and we don't believe that CoR and RtW are taking this position and preparing to defend it in reality.

Only a position against all cuts can prevent workers from being divided over which jobs and services should be cut, and keep the movement united. We also have differences with CoR and RtW on the issue of Labour councils.

This isn't an issue for the future, as workers are facing sackings and attacks on terms and conditions from Labour councils now. We'll work alongside any Labour councillor who is prepared to oppose the cuts by voting against them inside the council chamber and helping to build campaigns against them outside the chamber.

But taking an uncritical attitude towards Labour councillors, and Greens - and giving them platforms on demos etc to speak as reps of the anti-cuts movement - before they have committed to such a stance, will mislead workers who are being attacked and eventually put them off the anti-cuts movement.

We believe there are differences too regarding attitude to the trade union leaders. We see it as important that the anti-cuts movement acts as a lever on the trade union leaders from below, to push them to organise and coordinate strike action.

We don't believe that CoR and RtW will act as a lever in this way, putting the necessary demands on the trade union leaders. The danger is that if they are uncritical, they risk acting as a crutch for union leaders who don't lead the action that is necessary.

The NSSN actually pre-dates CoR and RtW, by years in fact (it was set up in 2007) and it was the first to organise an anti-cuts conference after the general election.

The idea of the NSSN being involved in anti-cuts campaigning is not new, it was raised at the NSSN conference in June 2010, when the policy of linking up with local community based anti-cuts campaigns was part of a statement agreed at that event.

With the election of the Con-Dem government, we knew that a 'fight to end all fights' was looming. On the issue of unity, it's worth noting that we are not proposing that the NSSN anti-cuts campaign, if it's set up on Saturday, will set up new local anti-cuts alliances to rival those that have already been established.

Unfortunately RtW is in the process of doing this in a number of areas.

We also have differences with CoR and RtW on the issue of democracy. At its conference, CoR did not have any debate and discussion in its plenary sessions, just platform speeches.

Neither does the SWP, that controls RtW, have a history of allowing debate and discussion at their public events, inviting minority opinions to be expressed.

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

3. The steering committee and officers' committee of the NSSN were divided on the new proposal., What were the different positions?

We believed that the NSSN had to definitely react to the cuts agenda of the government, and were surprised by the vehement oppostion from some of the other NSSN officers and steering committee members.

The vote at the steering committee was 21:17 in favour of setting up an anti-cuts campaign committee. The 17 against were mainly divided into three blocs, those who supported CoR, those who supported RtW (and were in fact members of it), and those who didn't think it was part of the remit of NSSN to go beyond being a network of workplace and trade union reps.

The supporters of CoR and RtW seemed to be expressing a political vested interest in leaving the road clear for those two organisations. Those in the third category were mostly genuine in their arguments, but we couldn't support their desire to keep the NSSN in a box and not place it at the heart of the anti-cuts movement nationally.

The job of active trade unionists right now is to get involved in the anti-cuts movement.

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

4. Is it proposed that the new NSSN anti-cuts campaign, if set up, will coordinate its work with the other national anti-cuts organisations?

Yes, we want to work with the other national anti-cuts organisations and have already made this clear. We have tried to link up with the other organisations to discuss common plans and avoid clashes of activities.

But if they don't oppose all cuts, then we'll be able to work with them on some issues but not others. Without the NSSN having its own anti-cuts campaign, its distinct programme and methods will not be heard in the anti-cuts movement, and we see this as vital.

The NSSN has already been playing a role in this respect; the left trade union leaders invited us to a Trade Union Coordinating Group meeting, as well as reps from the other anti-cuts bodies, to discuss the anti-cuts work of the left-led trade unions.

Hopefully a national anti-cuts conference organised by these unions will take place soon. The left trade union leaders must come to the fore in taking their own initiatives and putting pressure on the TUC, and the NSSN has a crucial role to play in this and in building support for their initiatives at rank and file level.

If the left union leaders as a whole don't do what's needed, then the NSSN will have to continue to campaign to build a movement that can do what's necessary to defeat the cuts.

We welcome the support given to the proposal for a NSSN anti-cuts campaign by RMT general secretary Bob Crow and RMT president Alex Gordon, and this shows that the NSSN is on the right track.

Through discussion we were able to clear up any doubts they had.

Bob Crow, RMT general secretary, speaking at the London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson

Bob Crow, RMT general secretary, speaking at the London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

5. As you've said, there was no debate allowed in the main sessions of the Coalition of Resistance conference on 27 November 2010., How will the NSSN conference differ from this?

The bulk of the NSSN special conference - nearly three hours - will be devoted to debate on the way forward. The two distinct positions will be put forward at the start.

The steering committee majority will propose that an anti-cuts campaign should be set up and that an anti-cuts committee should be elected that can act rapidly in response to events.

The steering committee minority will propose that we don't set up such a campaign, and that the NSSN carries on with 'business as usual', without a particular role in the anti-cuts movement.

Equal time will be allocated to speakers against and for the main motion.

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson

London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

6., Has agreement been reached on the agenda and speakers for the conference?

Yes, the NSSN officers met on 13 January and agreed the agenda, timings, chairs, and platform speakers. Despite what our opponents say, this will be the most democratic anti-cuts conference that has yet taken place.

It is worth noting that there has been a period of six weeks prior to the conference for discussion on the steering committee's central proposal. The debate has sometimes been sharp, but we're confident that it is raising the level of understanding of everyone, and that the conference on Saturday will do this further.

This democratic debate and discussion is part of clarifying issues and preparing the anti-cuts movement for the fight that it has to engage in. It is no good to just have rallies with lots of platform speakers and no genuine debate.

There should be nothing to fear from democratic debate, and in fact the Socialist Party has argued for the maximum time for this at the NSSN conference.

7. Why is voting on whether the new campaign is initiated being restricted to workplace and trade union representatives?

This is because the NSSN was set up by workplace and trade union representatives, as a body predominantly for rank and file trade unionists across all the unions.

So it is the right of those representatives to take the decision on whether the NSSN sets up an anti-cuts campaign, it is in line with how the NSSN is organised.

To do otherwise would be to change the character of the NSSN. Delegates from local community anti-cuts campaigns will be able to particpate in the debate however, and if the new anti-cuts campaign is agreed they will be able to vote on who will be on the anti-cuts committee that will lead the campaign.

Matt Wrack, FBU general secretary, speaking at the London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson

Matt Wrack, FBU general secretary, speaking at the London anti-cuts demonstration jointly called by the NSSN, RMT, NUT, FBU, PCS and other unions, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

8. What is the proposed structure of the new anti-cuts campaign? Will it seek affiliations from local anti-cuts alliances?

If the campaign is agreed, we are proposing that an anti-cuts committee is elected consisting of six workplace/union reps, four local community anti-cuts alliance reps and the chair and secretary of the NSSN.

We will propose there is some flexibility to allow others to be co-opted onto the committee according to the needs at each stage - for example if a union is taking national strike action, we would like to be able to invite a representative from that union to help plan activity etc.

Regarding support and affiliations, the new committee would need to discuss exactly how the campaign should be built. In the lively anti-cuts movement that is developing, local alliances may initially choose to send delegates and make affiliations to more than one of the national bodies, but over time, as these bodies are tested out in the struggles that take place, the local alliances will make an assessment of how best they can link their campaign with others nationally.

We are not proposing that the NSSN sets up its anti-cuts campaign as THE national anti-cuts campaign - only that it should exist alongside the other campaigns, and be able to fully engage in the political debates that will inevitably occur.

Of course though, the NSSN anti-cuts body would welcome all support and affiliations that are offered to it.

National Shop Stewards Network (NSSN) lobby of TUC congress 2010, photo Suleyman Civi

National Shop Stewards Network (NSSN) lobby of TUC congress 2010, photo Suleyman Civi   (Click to enlarge)

9., Will the new campaign stand candidates in elections?

No it won't. Socialist Party members on the steering committee did originally propose that the NSSN should support local anti-cuts alliance candidates who decide to stand in elections, but we withdrew this proposal, in the interests of unity, as it was opposed by others.

Nonetheless, the Socialist Party is encouraging anti-cuts alliances to stand candidates in the May elections under the banner of the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC).

TUSC has organised a conference on the same day as the NSSN conference (this Saturday), straight after the NSSN conference, to discuss this issue of standing candidates.

10. The NSSN has been a successful network for aiding workers' struggles and for putting pressure on the trade unions and TUC to act., Will the NSSN continue in its present form, and be able to go on with this work?

Yes, whatever way the vote goes on Saturday, the NSSN will continue to exist, and we will make this clear at the conference. The next normal conference of the NSSN is scheduled for June 2011, so that event will be an opportunity to discuss the further development of the NSSN whether it has an anti-cuts campaign agreed this Saturday or not.

Joint statement on NSSN anti-cuts conference

Bob Crow, Railway workers union general secretary, RMT, addresses NSSN lobby of TUC, photo Suleman Civi

Bob Crow, Railway workers union general secretary, RMT, addresses NSSN lobby of TUC, photo Suleman Civi

Statement on meeting between Bob Crow (RMT general secretary), Alex Gordon (RMT president), Bill Mullins (Socialist Party and co-organiser of the NSSN) and Linda Taaffe (Socialist Party and secretary of the NSSN)

A successful meeting was held which illuminated our agreement on a number of issues, including the vital importance of striving to convince the whole trade union movement to mobilise in a broad, united campaign against austerity cuts around the slogan of 'No to all cuts in jobs and services'.

Bob Crow and Alex Gordon agree with the proposal of the NSSN steering committee of 4 December 2010 to launch an anti-cuts campaign around that slogan.

We also agree with the recent proposal made by Matt Wrack (FBU, General Secretary) that fighting trade unions can and should take a leading role in this debate by initiating a broad based anti-cuts conference and inviting the various campaigns and organisations to participate in building a genuine and democratic campaign which could establish itself as an important focus of leadership in the coming period.

A number of misunderstandings were clarified. Linda Taaffe and Bill Mullins explained that the steering committee was not proposing to change the constitution of the NSSN in any way, but was only arguing for an additional campaigning anti-cuts committee to be founded in order that the NSSN can play a full part alongside community organisations and political parties in building a united movement against austerity cuts.

They also explained that the steering committee was not proposing that the NSSN, nor the anti-cuts campaign (were it to be set up by the conference on 22nd January), would stand candidates in elections.

The meeting agreed to urge all opponents of the cuts to attend the anti-cuts conference on 22nd January in order to take part in the discussion on what the NSSN steering committee is actually proposing.

Wednesday 12 January 2011

Fight public sector cuts!

Defend public services!

Saturday 22nd January 2011

11.30am to 3.30pm

South Camden Community School, Charrington Street, London NW1 1RG

All anti-cuts campaigns, trade union branches, trades councils and workplace organisations are invited to send delegates and visitors

Registration from 10.30am

The NSSN is the union rank and file body founded by the RMT transport union in 2007. It has organised annual national conferences since then involving hundreds of trade unionists.

The NSSN is active locally, regionally and nationally, pulling together workers in struggle. We say not one job or one service should be cut.

Never has there been a greater need for coordinated action.

Donate to the Socialist Party

Coronavirus crisis - Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

  • The Socialist Party's material is more vital than ever, so we can continue to report from workers who are fighting for better health and safety measures, against layoffs, for adequate staffing levels, etc.
  • Our 'fighting coronavirus workers' charter', outlines a programme to combat the virus and protect workers' living conditions.
  • When the health crisis subsides, we must be ready for the stormy events ahead and the need to arm workers' movements with a socialist programme - one which puts the health and needs of humanity before the profits of a few.
Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.
We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to donate to our special coronavirus appeal.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation


Your message: 


In The Socialist 19 January 2011:

National Shop Stewards Network

Unite against all the cuts

Discussing an NSSN anti-cuts campaign

Socialist Party NHS campaign

Save our NHS!

International socialist news and analysis

Tunisia in revolt

Socialist Party news and analysis

MPs' expenses scam continues: for workers' MPs on a worker's wage

Oldham East and Saddleworth by-election: A left-wing workers' alternative needed

Wales referendum: Vote Yes on 3 March - Defend public services in Wales

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition

Fighting cuts in Somerset

Socialist Party youth and students

Student receives draconian sentence

Students demand - 'save our EMA'

Education Maintenance Allowance: 11 January day of action

Urgent action needed to end youth unemployment

Socialist Party workplace news

PCS members vote for battle against cuts

Strike at sweatshop DWP centres

Teachers strike against redundancies

Heinz strikes force improved offer

Cameron 'thanks' postal workers by axing their jobs and pensions

Workplace news in brief


Home   |   The Socialist 19 January 2011   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  

Related links:

National Shop Stewards Network:

triangleFight for every job. Fight for socialism

triangleNSSN conference - 4th July

triangleDebenham's protests: Workers must not pay price of Covid-19

triangleDebenhams: Workers made to pay for Covid-19 crisis

triangleNational Shop Stewards Network conference


triangleFantastic virtual NSSN conference: "Fight for our lives and livelihoods''

triangleCome to the NSSN conference

triangleOrganising to fight for workplace safety

triangleNSSN: Workers' safety before profit!


triangleCaerphilly & RCT Socialist Party: How to fight the cuts

triangleFighting for over 250 jobs that are under threat at the Wales Millennium Centre in Cardiff. Photo M Kamish

triangleOnline rally: Fight the London transport funding cuts!

Shop Stewards:

triangleSupport Clive Walder

triangleNSSN conference 2019: at the heart of trade union struggle

Trade union:

triangleHugely significant council workers' strike continues


triangleCardiff West Socialist Party: Capitalism and mental health


triangleMandatory masks in shops law

Socialist Party:

triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: Origins and abolition of slavery


triangleP&O: defend every job - nationalise the ferries

Alex Gordon:

triangleThe role of the RMT in changing Labour

Bob Crow:

triangleStrike together to kick out the Tories!

Coalition of Resistance:

triangleThe NSSN, the anti-cuts struggle and the Trade Unions

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition:

triangleTime to relaunch TUSC


trianglePCS executive majority cancels union democracy

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis



Huawei: what's behind Johnson's u-turn?



Fight for our livelihoods... Fight for our lives!



Saving the music industry from pandemic and austerity



Luton Council sunk by airport investment: fight for funding, not speculation!


The Socialist

Getting the Socialist over the summer



Fight for the NHS



Tories using pandemic to privatise NHS more


Them & Us

Them & Us



Nationalise Tata Steel to save jobs



Housing crisis: what now and after the pandemic?



A socialist programme for schools


Young Socialists

Jobs, homes, services and a future for all!



Palace letters show the monarchy is a weapon for capitalism



Workers and young people need planning for jobs, not handouts for bosses



Sexist dismissal of women's health: NHS needs democratic control

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777


Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 075 4018 9052

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041



Alphabetical listing

August 2020

July 2020

June 2020

May 2020

April 2020

March 2020

February 2020

January 2020