Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

From The Socialist newspaper, 22 November 2006

Interview with John McDonnell MP

Can Labour be reclaimed?

Hannah Sell, assistant secretary of the Campaign for a New Workers' Party and Ken Smith, Socialist Party Trade Union organiser, interviewed John McDonnell MP on his challenge for the leadership of the Labour Party.
HS: Tony Blair argued in his speech to Labour Party conference that the Labour Party had not changed fundamentally, using Harold Wilson's anti-trade union In Place of Strife legislation as an example. Do you agree with him on that, and if so, what for you would mark a 'fundamental change' in the nature of the Labour Party?

JM: The Labour Party was a broad church coalition from its foundations with trade unionists coming together with socialists, Liberals, and social reformers to found the Labour Party as a voice for labour. It was always a broad church but it was always a terrain of struggle.

Up until John Smith's leadership that broad church was maintained. Kinnock tried to destroy part of it. But until Smith became leader of the party there was still an element of the broad church there.

The New Labour coup in 1994 was when the Labour Party was at its most vulnerable and had been out of power for 14 years. So they tried to even further destroy democracy within the party and exclude any dissent whatsoever from its own political trajectory.

I don't think it's been successful. If you look at the resistance there is within the party and within the trade union movement, there is a demand for a radical break. I think there's a resurgent Left both within the affiliated trade unions and within the constituency parties as well.

HS: And what is the state of the Labour Party at present?

JM: Official Labour Party membership figures have gone down from 400,000 to 190,000, of which realistically I don't think there's more than 130,000. Active membership, even if you gave them the benefit of the doubt and said it was 20%, you're talking about 20,000 active members.

It is at its lowest ebb in terms of rank-and-file membership. However, I think of that membership there is still a determined Left that still exists. And, therefore, particularly amongst our affiliates from the trade unions where the Broad Lefts now dominate most of the major unions there is the potential there of regaining a position within the Labour Party.

HS: Is part of your campaign strategy to encourage people to join the Labour Party?

JM: It's a twin strategy really. What I'm trying to do in a completely non-sectarian way is to try and encourage people to work through the Labour Party by joining the Labour Party or use their union's affiliation to the Labour Party to maximum effect in the policy debate and the fight for positions.

In addition to that, I'm also trying to say to those people who've taken a conscious decision not to work through the Labour Party, there's a lot of issues where we can campaign for common objectives and we can engage in the same policy debate that we can create this climate of hegemony for socialism in which we can win the battle of ideas.

HS: At the TUC, opinion surveys showed that about 60% of the delegates would back you or vote for you in this contest. So far that has not materialised into any major union leader declaring for you. Why do you think this is and what can trade unionists do to assist you getting such backing?

JM: The Electoral Reform Society did a ballot, which was a voluntary ballot, so I don't know how scientific that was. But, I think it reflected - 58% said they'd vote for me - what the media were picking up as well.

Additionally, a number of media did straw polls of delegates going in and out of the conference itself and again we were picking up 50%-60%.

So, at a rank-and-file level there's clearly a demand for policy change which is reflected in support for the candidacy.

HS: But at the top none of the big affiliated unions have yet called for support for you.

JM: Let's be frank. The big four general secretaries have come together and taken a decision not to announce who they are supporting and that's on the basis that they want to negotiate with Gordon Brown.

They think that Brown is going to win and they want to negotiate policy positions.

However, when it comes down to it there will be a one person, one vote in the affiliated trade unions.

The Broad Lefts - Amicus Gazette and the TGWU Broad Left - are supporting my campaign and assisting us in distributing material, And, on that basis - exactly as we planned and exactly as I wanted it - this is a rank-and-file campaign with rank-and-file support.

HS: What can readers of the socialist, particularly those active in the unions, do to help your campaign?

JM: Obviously, members of the Socialist Party are not looking to work through the Labour Party, I accept that. That's the position they have taken.

But what I want them to do is two things: Firstly, if they are members of an affiliated trade union I would expect them to support a Left candidate as they would normally do in any of these battles.

And, secondly, in a completely open, non-sectarian way is the most important thing is for political groups to have the debate about the policy issues for the future of the country.

KS: If you were to win the leadership of the Labour Party would you reinstitute a modern version of Clause Four [the socialist clause Blair removed from Labour's constitution] and would adherence to that be a test of Labour Party membership?

JM: If you look at the LRC (Labour Representation Committee) which we established, and I'm chair of, it has its own version of Clause Four. And that reflects the original and that is about adherence to basic socialist policies.

And, at the same time, you debate their interpretation and you don't use the powers of expulsion or draconian disciplinary measures to undermine that debate.

KS: But, obviously, if somebody in your cabinet was in favour of further privatisation of education, health you'd ask them to leave surely.

JM: Well you would ask them what they were doing in the party. But I don't work on that basis but work on the basis of winning the argument.

HS: We welcome the fact you are fighting this contest to win. However, I am sure you recognise that there is discussion amongst your supporters on what happens if you don't win, or even succeed in getting enough MPs nominations to get on the ballot paper. [He needs 44 nominations.] How would you see things developing in that instance?

JM: My campaign was deliberately not launched in Parliament. It was launched at a public meeting in Manchester not in a parliamentary committee room.

What I didn't want was the traditional Labour Party campaign where it was seen as a group of MPs coming together, stomping out of the bar and saying here's our campaign and programme.

I deliberately wanted this to be seen as a rank-and-file initiative. My idea around the campaign is to try and build up the momentum in the constituencies and trade unions which will give confidence to Labour MPs to nominate.

Labour MPs in the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) are not used to voting, let alone nominating. They've only had one vote in the PLP in the last nine years and that was over the disciplinary procedures over MPs who speak against the Whip.

So they're not exactly used to democracy.

If we can build the momentum in the constituencies and the trade unions I'm confident we can get on the ballot paper.

There's a strong argument that we're putting to MPs that if they don't nominate me they won't have a chance of voting. It will be a coronation rather than an election.

So, I think on that basis we'll get on the ballot paper.

I don't contemplate defeat. I just don't contemplate it. There is no struggle that we go into where we talk about what happens when we lose. I'm talking about what happens when we win.

HS: What would it take for you to decide to agree with us that the Labour Party is finished as a vehicle for working-class people to struggle through?

JM: That's too hypothetical. Concrete realities of tactics and strategy need to be taken on board here.

A new mass workers' party

The socialist interviewed John McDonnell MP about his decision to stand for the leadership of the Labour Party. Unlike John McDonnell we do not believe that New Labour remains a broad church.

While this was true in the past today the Labour Party is under the iron grip of the Blairities. The Labour Party today is virtually an empty shell, in which democratic structures which previously at least allowed the working class, particularly via the trade unions, a voice within the Labour Party have been completely destroyed.

Since 1997 the trade unions have given more than 100 million to New Labour. They have been rewarded with a relentless diet of cuts, privatisation and war. We believe the time has come for the trade unions to stop funding New Labour and begin to build a new party that actually represents their members' interests.

However, the majority of trade union leaders are still mistakenly arguing that New Labour can be changed.

We believe that if they are sincere in this, those in affiliated trade unions should support John McDonnell's campaign for the leadership.

McDonnell may be the only candidate other than Brown the Blairite, and is certainly the only candidate who stands on a programme that is in the interests of trade union members, in that it is against cuts, low pay and privatisation.

If McDonnell gets enough support to get on the ballot paper, we will call on those trade unionists that have a vote in the election to vote for him.

However if, as we unfortunately expect, the Labour leadership contest confirms Labour cannot be reclaimed, we argue that McDonnell and the other Labour lefts should draw the necessary conclusions from this and throw their weight behind the building of a new mass workers' party.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.

In The Socialist 22 November 2006:

Public health not private profit

Nurses against 'natural wastage'

Swansea says no closures

Ipswich campaign saves nurses' jobs

Pensioners lead the way

Socialism 2006

Socialism 2006 main rally

Films show a world of rising struggles

Socialist Party youth rally

Socialism 2006: a great success

Collection a big success

Socialism 2006 closing rally: defend the NHS

Sri Lanka


Stop the fat cats! No to Cutbacks! Fight tuition fees!

New Socialist Party publication

Marxism in Today's World

The Socialist Interview

Can Labour be reclaimed?

Homelessness Feature

Homelessness: Privatising the problem

International socialist news

Worldwide protests at MP's murder

Leicester protest

Thatcher's monetarist guru dies

Prodi government under siege

US rages but Ortega's victory is no revolution

Socialist Party news and analysis

Queen's speech says 'work till you drop'

Lincoln organises against the far right

Socialist Party workplace news

Local government pensions: We're no April fools!

Disciplinary action against UNISON secretary

JJB Sports workers score a victory

Fujitsu on strike


Home   |   The Socialist 22 November 2006   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  

Related links:


triangleRMT Labour Party affiliation debate - where do socialists stand?

triangleSouthampton: the cuts or no cuts election

triangleWindrush scandal: Tories and Blairites must go

triangleTories out!

John McDonnell:

triangleBritish Museum: Carillion workers demand to be brought back in-house

triangleMcDonnell says Labour would put services 'irreversibly' in workers' hands

triangleCapitalists fear for their system at Davos

triangleNHS: use the 3 February protests as a launch pad for a mass movement

Labour Party:

triangleFor a fighting, democratic Labour Party

triangleMay elections: a chance to fight attacks on health and social care


triangleSchool strike forces head to say privatisation will stop

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns



Journalists' union leaders defeat call for political fund, but potential for left grows



Retail union backs zero-hour ban, leaders oppose rank-and-file coordination



McDonald's strikers: "We demand a living wage and decent conditions"



Sheffield and South Yorkshire: no to closures - defend our NHS



Southampton: the cuts or no cuts election



School strike forces head to say privatisation will stop



College protest against job losses



Bromley library workers win strike campaign



UCU members vote to end pensions dispute



Usdaw conference 2018: time for new era of fighting trade unionism



Victorious Fearnville Fields campaigners thank the Socialist



Hull says no to war, no to austerity


The Socialist

The Socialist - a fighting, campaigning, workers' paper


Socialist Party

Building fund: 150,000 milestone smashed!


Fighting Fund

Give us your change (and more) to fight for system change!

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777


Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 0798 202 1969

East Mids: 0773 797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 0784 114 4890

North West 07769 611 320

South East: 020 8988 8777

South West: 07759 796 478

Southern: 07833 681910

Wales: 07935 391 947

West Mids: 02476 555 620

Yorkshire: 0114 264 6551



Alphabetical listing

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018