Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

Posted on 29 October 2013 at 13:12 GMT

Teachers: no national action this term

Martin Powell-Davies, a member of the NUT executive and candidate for NUT Vice President
Teachers strike and march in Bristol 17 October 2013 as part of selective action by the NUT and NASUWT, photo Matt Carey

Teachers strike and march in Bristol 17 October 2013 as part of selective action by the NUT and NASUWT, photo Matt Carey   (Click to enlarge)

After three well-supported joint regional strikes by the NASUWT and NUT unions, teachers were expecting the NUT executive to confirm the promised date for national strike action in November.

Instead, a joint press release has been issued calling off any action before Christmas. Teachers will be asked to lobby their MPs at the end of November instead.

The official reason for this decision is that Michael Gove has confirmed that he is "willing to discuss a basis for genuine talks on the unions' trade disputes".

However, even if that were true, it would have been far better to have announced a firm date for strike action, so Gove knew what to expect once it became clear that he wasn't offering serious negotiations.

Our well-supported regional strikes were starting to put Gove onto the back foot. His failed educational policies, not least free schools, are increasingly exposed.

Yet the unions' unexpected announcement will have given Gove renewed confidence to maintain his attacks on teachers and education.

It makes it even more likely that he will press ahead with some or all of his threatened attacks on teachers' working conditions in the New Year.

Fixed position

Gove has already made his position clear. He wrote to both unions back in March saying that he was happy to talk as long as unions accepted that the "direction of travel" on raising pension ages to 68 and imposing performance-related pay was "fixed".

Gove wrote again in the same vein in September, before the main round of regional strikes, making it clear that he was only offering talks "about the implementation of these changes".

This is the reality. Yet NUT members are being told that the action has been called off because, thanks to the regional action, Gove has "offered talks".

No doubt it's a story that will have encouraged some teachers. However, that relief could easily turn to anger once the truth emerges.

Many union reps will already be angry. After the retreat in 2012, when no further regions were called into action after the London NUT regional strike over pensions, it seemed that momentum was building again. Now they are going to have to explain another setback to their members.

The only way to successfully build further action is to be honest about the real reason that the action was called off.

It wasn't because Gove was having a change of heart - the threat of a serious programme of on-going strike action will be needed to achieve that.

It was because, for whatever reason, the NASUWT executive had withdrawn from their commitment to strike action this term and the majority on the NUT executive felt they could not call action without them.

In response, NUT and NASUWT members need to meet jointly in every school and demand that escalating national strike action is put back in place in the New Year and that no unacceptable deals are struck on the basis of Gove's 'fixed' policies on pay and pensions.

That's also why a minority of ten members of the NUT national executive supported my objection to the officers' recommendations and called for the NUT to proceed with strike action on November 27.

Of course joint action with the NASUWT would have had a greater effect but we're in danger of having no serious campaign of action at all from either union.

Wrong signal

This setback has the potential to be a lot more serious than just a few months' delay in calling national action.

It sends a signal to both Gove and union members that perhaps their unions are not serious about winning this dispute.

If we are, we should have been making plans to escalate our action after Christmas, perhaps to a two-day strike.

Instead, teachers are offered only the possibility of a one-day national strike around the beginning of February followed by further regional strikes.

That's not a serious escalation and, if we're not careful, teachers will start to question whether it's worth losing pay to support such drawn-out action.

The bitter reality facing classroom teachers means that they are willing to sacrifice a great deal to defeat Gove's attacks - but only if they think their leaders are leading a serious battle.

NUT members at least have an immediate opportunity to show their anger at the postponement of action and to vote for a new leadership when they receive their ballot papers this week to elect two new NUT national vice-presidents.

As my election statement says: "I called for continued action on pensions in 2012. Instead, union hesitation encouraged Gove to attack our pay.

We have taken regional action in 2013. Now a calendar of national strikes must follow. Further hesitation would invite further attacks. Gove needs to know we are standing firm".

I would ask everyone who agrees with that statement to call on NUT members across England and Wales to VOTE POWELL-DAVIES 1

This version of this article was first posted on the Socialist Party website on 29 October 2013 and may vary slightly from the version subsequently printed in The Socialist.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.

Related links:


triangleNEU conference: Teachers vote to strike over pay and workload

triangleNEU conference 2018: Strike to take on the Tories

triangleSchools "can't go any further" - stop the cuts: set deficit budgets now

triangleEscalate summer strike wave into coordinated action to defeat the pay cap

triangleSchools and teaching: A perfect storm of cuts, underfunding, excessive workloads and low pay


triangleTaking the anti-austerity message to the chancellor's back yard

triangleFor Whom the School Bell Tolls: Our kids or the Tories?

triangleNHS pay: Reject the Tories' divide and rule offer

triangleWorkplace news in brief


triangleMcDonald's strikers: "We demand a living wage and decent conditions"

triangleSchool strike forces head to say privatisation will stop


triangleTeachers vote to ballot for strike to win 5% raise

triangleSouthampton asks "What will you do to stop education cuts?"

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis



RMT Labour Party affiliation debate - where do socialists stand?



Windrush scandal: Tories and Blairites must go



Tories out!



Enoch Powell's racist 'Rivers of Blood' rant 50 years on


Them & Us

Them & Us



Billions for the bosses, benefit cuts for us



1,400 beds empty as patients lay in corridors: health unions must act now



Young people need homes



For a fighting, democratic Labour Party



A socialist approach to Corbyn and a customs union


Child poverty

Child poverty to hit 5m by 2021 - strikes can stop the cuts


Equal pay

Gender pay gap figures show need for trade union action


Young people

Alienation and austerity behind London deaths - fight for socialism



Fight the Tory enemy


Northern Ireland

Northern Ireland: peace process on the brink

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777


Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 0798 202 1969

East Mids: 0773 797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 0784 114 4890

North West 07769 611 320

South East: 020 8988 8777

South West: 07759 796 478

Southern: 07833 681910

Wales: 07935 391 947

West Mids: 02476 555 620

Yorkshire: 0114 264 6551



Alphabetical listing

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018