Join us today!

Printable version

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/483/2319

From The Socialist newspaper, 19 April 2007

Venezuela: Will the trade unions give up their independence?

Chávez issues ultimatum for joining the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV)

THE VENEZUELAN president has announced the need to create a united socialist party, capable of transforming Venezuela and setting out on the road to socialism. This is positive. However, we have to look beyond the rhetoric at the process which is actually unfolding.

Karl Debbaut, Committee for a Workers' International (CWI)

In a speech made on 24 March, in front of 2,400 promoters of the future United Socialist Party of Venezuela, president Hugo Chávez warned the leaders of the political parties and the trade unions who do not want to follow him into the new proposed party that they face mass desertion: "I know what's going to happen and I'll lend them my little red car (a red Volkswagen beetle given to him by the defence minister) so that they can go for a ride. They'll all fit".

Hugo Chávez, Venezuelan President Photo Marc Vallee

The debate about whether or not to join the new party has been raging since the announcement of Chávez after his re-election in December that he wanted to form a unified socialist party to govern with. The president insisted that this new party will be built from below, will be a key force against bureaucracy, and will represent a major step forwards towards Socialism in Venezuela.

Political parties

With the notable exception of the PCV, the Venezuelan Communist Party, all the biggest pro-Chávez coalition parties have dissolved themselves or are slowly disintegrating.

The right wing of the Chávez coalition, represented by parties such as Podemos and Patria Para Todos (PPT) have tried to resist the call to dissolve themselves and have argued against the radical socialist rhetoric of the president.

Both of these parties defended their position in the name of pluralism, against one party government and very significantly mentioned that their brand of socialism is one which defends "private property". While the CWI supports the rights for different parties to exist, we do not agree with the continuation of capitalism as defended by Podomeros and PPT.

The paradox is that after weeks of verbal assaults against these parties by Chávez and leaders of the main Chávez party, the MVR, some of the most right-wing elements of Podemos and the PPT have jumped ship and joined the PSUV to save their careers.

The PCV, the oldest still existing party in Venezuelan politics, decided that it could not join the PSUV. The general secretary of the party, Oscar Figuera, declared that "when it is being said that the unity party will not be a Marxist-Leninist party, which we obviously are, it is clear that the conditions do not exist for us to dissolve ourselves".

Chávez responded to this statement by saying that he had studied Marxism in his youth, read Lenin's State and Revolution whilst in the army but that "socialism in the 21st century" had nothing to do with Marxism-Leninism (see www.socialistworld.net Venezuela: Political crisis hits the Chávez government).

Not all is what it seems...

While so far there is little evidence that the new party is going to be built from the ground upwards and that it will fulfil its promise to be democratic and an instrument for the socialist transformation of society, we should not underestimate the expectations which exist amongst a layer of activists in the building of the PSUV. They see it as a potential victory over the reformist and bureaucratic party machines of the existing parties of the Chávez government.

The hatred towards the corrupt officialdom of these parties is expressed in the popular jokes about the names of the pro-Chávez parties. Some call the main Chávez party, Movement for the Venezuelan Republic (MVR), Me Volv' Rico: "I came back rich". In the same way the synonym for Patria Para Todos has become Plata Para Todos: "Money for all" instead of "Fatherland for all" and Podemos is referred to as Pedimos: "We Ask", instead of "We Can".

Workers left in cold

As the language about socialism in the 21st century penetrates more widely, it jars with the daily experience of many workers. The debate in society about socialism, in large part started by Chávez, is extremely positive.

However, there is the danger that if the rhetoric is out of tune with reality, workers will draw their own conclusions and over time withdraw their support for 'socialism in the 21st century'. It is that conjuncture the right wing opposition and American imperialism are waiting for to deliver a death blow to the Venezuelan revolutionary process.

The public sector workers, for example, had to wait for 27 months before collective bargaining started. The same is happening with the workers in the oil-sector at present.

To add to this the government has declared recently that while it wants to put the strategic sectors of the economy under state control, it will not allow workers' participation in the management of these enterprises.

Chávez even declared that he will not nationalise SIDOR, one of the biggest steel companies privatised under the pre-Chávez government, because it is an example of "good capitalism".

The trade union leader Orlando Chirino reacted by saying: "We understand that president Chávez says this because this is a company owned by a multinational [Techint] based in Argentina; a country that is a friend of Venezuela as is its president Kirchner. But we ask the question: since when has a good or bad form of capitalism existed?"

Independent unions

Chávez also attacked the left wing of the trade union confederation, UNT, who at this point do not want to join the unified party.

"Trade unions who do not want to have anything to do with the party or the government, who want to be independent, it is a kind of blackmail... they remain odourless, tasteless".

Referring to Rosa Luxemburg's 1906 pamphlet, The Mass Strike, the Political Party and the Trade Unions, Chávez said that trade unions cannot be autonomous from the PSUV.

However, Luxemburg's polemic was aimed at the developing reformist social democratic trade union and party bureaucracy in Germany. At this time the social democtrats still formally based itself on Marxism and the overthrow of capitalism.

The relative stability of German capitalism, combined with the growth of the German workers' movement at the time, laid the basis for an emerging trade union bureaucracy.

The trade union bureaucracies' demand for political independence from the party was a facade behind which the bureaucracy aimed to stifle the influence of the activist base.

This demand was aimed at breaking the link with the revolutionary programme and opening the way for the further development of reformism. Rosa Luxemburg foresaw this and defended genuine Marxism.

The debate in the Venezuelan trade union federation UNT about whether or not to join the PSUV has different roots altogether. While the UNT right wing and the trade union organisers closest to the government and the state machinery have decided to join the PSUV when it is eventually formed, the left wing is defending its independence from the state and its independence from the PSUV.

The debate about independence is an empty debate if it does not refer to the class independence of the workers and poor.

This is a concrete issue in relation to the Venezuelan state which, at this stage, cannot be described as a workers' state.

As Lenin pointed out in 1921, in a workers' state that has broken with capitalism the trade unions have a double task; providing the main body of activists and specialists to build the workers' state and defend it, whilst at the same time defending the working class, including against the bureaucratic elements within their own state.

In the process of transformation between capitalism and socialism the workers still need independent trade unions to defend their rights and demands.

The current debates in the Venezuelan workers' movement are extremely important.

The CWI, while defending wholeheartedly every positive reform for the working class and poor of Venezuela taken by the Chávez government, insists that it is the task of the working class to overthrow capitalism and start to build a socialist society. To make this possible, workers need to build their own organisations, trade unions and political parties based on their own class interests and demands.

Donate to the Socialist Party

Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

The Socialist Party's material is more vital than ever, so we can continue to report from workers who are fighting for better health and safety measures, against layoffs, for adequate staffing levels, etc.
When the health crisis subsides, we must be ready for the stormy events ahead and the need to arm workers' movements with a socialist programme - one which puts the health and needs of humanity before the profits of a few.