Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/26184

Posted on 22 September 2017 at 15:55 GMT

Ledbury tenants fight for decent homes

Ledbury Estate, south London, photo Philip Talmage/CC

Ledbury Estate, south London, photo Philip Talmage/CC   (Click to enlarge)

The Socialist has previously reported that the Ledbury estate in Southwark, South London, following the Grenfell Tower fire, was declared wholly unsafe by structural engineers and residents were told they may have to temporarily leave.

This was due to large cracks (which you could fit your whole hand into) in the fabric of the four 13-storey tower blocks.

The Labour council was forced into action by the revelation that the blocks should never have been installed with gas because the structures would fail in the event of explosion and, like the Newham tower block Ronan Point in 1968, lead to collapse.

Ledbury tenants, photo by Arti

Ledbury tenants, photo by Arti   (Click to enlarge)

Danielle Gregory, Ledbury tenant and leading figure in the Ledbury action group spoke to Southwark Socialist Party activist Bill Mullins.

Bill: Ledbury tenants had been complaining about the cracks for over 20 years. When did you get involved?

Danielle: I have been a tenant for eight years and raised the issue with the council many times. They said there was nothing to worry about, it was down to 'natural movement' but I realised it posed significant fire risk.

On 6 June, a few days before the Grenfell fire I raised concerns. The council once again said there was nothing wrong.

It was only after Grenfell that the council took it seriously. They didn't want to; I had to call the fire brigade in, and their report gave a damning verdict (on the dangerous state of the blocks).

It was only after I threatened to go to the press did the council conduct its own investigation.

BM: What is the main demand of the tenants after Grenfell?

DG: We want safe council homes and an end to the negligence of the council.

Arup (the council's appointed building engineers) came along to look at the blocks. But we took advice from experts, who the Guardian had initially approached for comment, and on 11 July they pointed out, to both Arup and the council, that having gas installations in the building made it very unsafe.

How is it that our experts can see the problem but theirs can't? Is it incompetence or something more sinister?

BM: There were two issues, the cracks in the buildings and the unsafe gas installations. I believe there is a third one now?

DG: Yes there is now the whole question of structural viability. This is a result of the discovery that the buildings do not meet the regulations following the Ronan Point collapse in 1968.

The council cannot find the plans from when blocks were built between 1968 and 1970 and whether they live up to the regulations from that period.

BM: What will do you want if it turns out the blocks have to come down?

DG: We want to see the blocks safely fixed, that is our priority. If that cannot happen we want the land kept in the council and that the new buildings are council tenancies.

BM: What has the council said to that?

DG: Vague promises. If Arup says it's not feasible or affordable the council have refused to say what they will then do. They refuse to enter into discussions about that!

BM: What do you want if the blocks are not brought up to standard?

DG: Sam Webb (a retired RIBA architect) said the buildings cannot be safely fixed. If that is true then we are really upset.

We are now awaiting the Arup report due out on 20 November. If it says the blocks can be fixed, good. But if not then we expect the promise made by council leader Peter John to keep the land in council ownership be delivered, and that any new developments are council homes not private ones.

We have to be prepared to fight against what Peter John inferred - that a PPP (public-private partnership) arrangement would take its place. We are totally against this.

First and foremost we want the blocks fixed. If Arup says the buildings have to come down, we want a guarantee that the blocks will be replaced by council homes at council rents, with council tenants, not so called 'affordable ones' or 'housing partnerships'.


Ledbury estate protest march

Sunday 24th September

3pm, outside Ledbury TRA hall, Pencraig Way, off Old Kent Road, London SE15 1SH


This version of this article was first posted on the Socialist Party website on 22 September 2017 and may vary slightly from the version subsequently printed in The Socialist.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.






Related links:

Southwark:

triangleHundreds evacuated after Labour council dismisses cracks in tower blocks

triangleTenants' meeting reveals huge anger

triangleHealth cuts responsible for rise in deaths - reverse all austerity now

triangleThe Socialist Inbox

triangleThe Socialist inbox

Tenants:

triangleSix months on - still no justice for Grenfell

triangleTwo in five 'right to buy' homes now for let

triangleThem & us

triangleCorbyn must challenge pro-gentrification council leader or others will

Homes:

triangleNo to the Woolwich monster block

triangleDebate: should tower blocks form part of socialist housing policy?

triangleThousands live in tents and sheds - seize empty homes

Council:

triangleCarlisle debate: The way forward - Socialism or Social Democracy?

triangleCorbyn's Labour needs 100% anti-cuts strategy and fight for democracy

Fire:

triangleFire service victory

South London:

triangleSouth London health bosses' cover-up

London:

triangleSudan: Free Mohamed Satti

Labour:

triangleWe must fight all council cuts!

Grenfell Tower:

triangleNo more excuses: fit sprinklers now!

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

22/1/18

Sudan

Sudan: Free Mohamed Satti

22/1/18

London

Women rally defiantly

22/1/18

Obituary

Red Mary - a Force of Nature

17/1/18

Women

Socialist Party women's meeting brings together members to share experiences

17/1/18

Newham

Packed Newham meeting against academies

17/1/18

Liverpool

Lobby pushes Liverpool council to oppose privatisation

17/1/18

Barking

Heating scandal on east London estate

17/1/18

Policing

Undercover policing legal challenge

17/1/18

Woolwich

No to the Woolwich monster block

17/1/18

Union

Workplace news in brief

17/1/18

Union

PCS union 2018 elections - nominate the left slate for a continued fighting leadership

17/1/18

Hackney

Hackney school cleaners strike

17/1/18

RMT

RMT strikes against driver-only operation continue

17/1/18

Yorkshire

Ferrybridge: Workers down tools over unpaid wages

17/1/18

Cuts

We must fight all council cuts!

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle22 Jan Women rally defiantly

triangle22 Jan Red Mary - a Force of Nature

triangle17 Jan Corbyn's Labour needs 100% anti-cuts strategy and fight for democracy

triangle17 Jan NHS crisis: under pressure from all angles - end cuts and sell-offs!

triangle17 Jan We must fight all council cuts!

triangle16 Jan Home care workers to strike

triangle15 Jan Carillion crisis: Demand action to save jobs and services

More ...

triangle23 Jan Bristol North Socialist Party: 'You can't have capitalism without racism' - was Malcolm X correct?

triangle23 Jan Cardiff West Socialist Party: How the Poll Tax was beaten

triangle24 Jan Caerphilly Socialist Party: The Carillion scandal

triangle24 Jan Cardiff Central Socialist Party: Carillion collapse - Watershed moment for public services

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Archive

Archives:

January 2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

Legal

SP RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice

V2