Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/386/4365

From The Socialist newspaper, 2 April 2005

Asylum and immigration - what we're thinking

THE CURRENT 'debate' on asylum and immigration makes it hard to separate fact from fiction.
Naomi Byron looks at some of the concerns that are widespread, and argues for a socialist approach.

Some people say: "There are too many asylum seekers - we need stricter controls."

Repressive regimes, war and conflict, economic crises and environmental disasters are the conditions that create refugees internationally. We are now living in an increasingly unstable and violent world, and this has led to growing numbers of people leaving their homes to try and escape terrible conditions.

Those conditions are the consequences of the capitalist system which is based on exploitation, competition and the pursuit of profit; a system which New Labour and the other main political parties represent. It is this system that condemns 1.2 billion people to live on less than $1 a day, and that means that the richest 200 companies have combined sales worth more than the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of all but ten nations in the world. Globally, $1 trillion a year is wasted on military spending.

It is a system of economic crises, increasingly leading to whole states 'failing'. As long as we live under capitalism it is inevitable that people will try to escape persecution, repression and disaster in their home country by seeking asylum abroad. Others will travel the world as economic migrants - hoping to escape grinding poverty.

Last year the biggest groups of people who claimed asylum in Britain came from Iran, Somalia, China, Zimbabwe and Iraq - all countries with dictatorships, major human rights abuses or war.

The story of Mansoor Hassan (see page 12) is just a small glimpse of the terrible conditions which refugees are fleeing. The Home Office alone decides whether to give asylum seekers refuge or not. If the Home Office refuses there are very few rights to appeal.

Despite all the claims by the government and the media that many asylum claims are 'bogus', many genuine claims from refugees are still turned down. Right First Time?, a report by the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture, shows how Home Office caseworkers have routinely refused asylum to refugees who have suffered torture, dismissing expert medical evidence that supports their testimony.

Harsher laws will not prevent people trying to enter this country. They will just push more refugees into the hands of the people-traffickers, forcing them to break the law and risk their lives in more dangerous forms of transport.

Refugees should have the right to enter Britain by legal routes. Once here, their application should be dealt with promptly so that they do not have to put up with huge delays. Removing asylum seekers' right to work while their claims are being decided has forced people onto benefits (at lower levels than UK citizens) to survive. While applications are being processed, asylum seekers should be able to work with the same employment rights as other workers, and not used as cheap labour for unscrupulous bosses.

Asylum seekers who have their cases turned down should have a genuine right to appeal, not to the Home Office or an unelected judge, but to committees made up of representatives from the trade unions, refugee organisations and community groups.

Some people say: "But our public services can't cope with so many asylum seekers and immigrants."

After eighteen years of Tory cuts, followed by more of the same from New Labour, there is a real problem with under-funding of public services. But Britain is a rich country. Since Tony Blair came to power the wealth of the top 1% has doubled from £355 billion to £797 billion - more than the government spends in five years on education, the NHS and housing combined! During the same period the poorest 50% of the population have seen their share of the national wealth drop from 7% to 5%.

When the government is determined to find the money for something, it can: just look at the £5 billion they have spent so far on invading and occupying Iraq. However, New Labour has followed a relentless policy of increasing the profits of big business at the expense of working people.

This has meant endless privatisation and cuts in public services. As a result, even small increases in the number of people needing to use over-stretched services in an area can create enormous pressure. But demonising asylum seekers and immigrants is not a solution.

If the government could expel all asylum-seekers from the country tomorrow, does anyone really believe that they would put the money saved from the asylum system back into public services for the rest of the population? Of course not.

The government is only prepared to spend money where it suits their priorities - handing over profits to the private companies who are getting fat at our expense. We need united community campaigns for better services for all, including extra resources to cope with changes in population.

If all the immigrants in Britain stopped working tomorrow, most public services - like the health service, transport and schools - would collapse. 31% of doctors and 13% of nurses were born outside the UK. Last year two thirds of newly-registered doctors, and more than 40% of nurses, came from abroad. 11,000 of the teachers working in schools in England were born overseas.

In 1998/9 immigrants as a whole paid £2.6 billion more in tax than all the public spending on immigrants, including asylum-seekers, put together.

Some people say: "Many immigrants are prepared to work harder, for less money - our jobs are under threat."

Cheap labour is one of the major reasons why big business and the government are keen to encourage immigration. 80% of the registered immigrant workers from new EU countries working in the UK last year were earning only between £4.50 and £5.99 an hour.

British big business is keen to attract migrant labour, supposedly to fill 'skill gaps' in the economy. However, these skills shortages are often a result of a failure to invest in long-term training and education in Britain, or wages and conditions that are so bad that many workers are not prepared to put up with them.

How can workers in Britain make sure that wage rates and conditions are not driven down by cheap labour brought in from abroad? Some argue for increasing restrictions on migrants' right to work and claim benefits. But this only gives the bosses even more power to exploit cheap migrant labour. If you have no safety net or legal protection you will be more desperate and prepared to work for less - like the Chinese migrants who died in Morecambe Bay, working for £1 per day.

Many more migrants will be forced into the illegal economy where they have no rights at all and the threat of calling immigration is often all the boss needs to put an end to any talk of rights at work.

The best protection for workers in Britain is to fight for migrant workers to have the same rights as the existing workforce, so that migrants can't be used to force down wages or conditions. This is what the trade unions did, eventually, in response to immigration to Britain during the 50s, 60s and 70s - it is desperately needed again today.

Just as we can't trust the bosses with our public services, we can't trust them to decide who can and can't move around the world or have the right to work in order to boost their profits. We need democratic working-class ownership and control of the economy and resources so that we can plan to meet the needs of the whole of society and not just a privileged rich elite.

The wars, persecution and poverty that refugees and migrants are trying to escape are part of the same profit system that exploit us in Britain - the system that New Labour, the Tories and the Liberal Democrats all support.

The potential exists to abolish poverty and provide education, health care and jobs for the world's population, without any reduction in living standards for any but the wealthy few who run society today. But it is only by ending the profits system that all of our needs be met. That is what the Socialist Party is fighting for here and internationally.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 2 April 2005:

Liar Blair must go!

No PFI or hospital closures in Bristol!

General election - main parties offer no solutions

Stop these deportations

Asylum and immigration - what we're thinking

Judge backs false imprisonment of May Day protesters

Can we save the planet?

Peter Taaffe's Asian tour

Kyrgyzstan and the ‘Tulip revolution’

Delegates vote to keep up pressure over pensions

Coventry: Save Peugeot jobs

Pensions: postal workers must show solidarity

Fighting cuts at the Housing Corporation

College lecturers fight for pay deal

UNISON National Executive Council elections


 

Home   |   The Socialist 2 April 2005   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Asylum:

triangleBristol and Bath students join detained asylum seekers' protest

triangleBristol Socialist Students join Yarlswood demo

triangleVienna: 50,000 march against racism and austerity

triangleSweden: School strike against deportations

triangleRoyal wedding exposes them-and-us visa system

Immigration:

triangleEnoch Powell's racist 'Rivers of Blood' rant 50 years on

triangleThem & Us

triangleMay's lies about foreign students exposed

triangleReject Starmer's Single Market u-turn

Socialist:

triangleLewisham & Southwark Socialist Party: Reform or Revolution?

triangleLewisham & Southwark Socialist Party: What would a socialist council look like?

Labour:

triangleBristol South Socialist Party: How can councils protect public services?

triangleLocal paper reveals Labour candidate 'tried to defect to the Tories'

Britain:

triangleA socialist approach to Corbyn and a customs union

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

18/4/18

UCU

UCU members vote to end pensions dispute

18/4/18

Usdaw

Usdaw conference 2018: time for new era of fighting trade unionism

18/4/18

Leeds

Victorious Fearnville Fields campaigners thank the Socialist

18/4/18

Hull

Hull says no to war, no to austerity

18/4/18

The Socialist

The Socialist - a fighting, campaigning, workers' paper

18/4/18

Socialist Party

Building fund: £150,000 milestone smashed!

18/4/18

Fighting Fund

Give us your change (and more) to fight for system change!

18/4/18

Scotland

Workers' victory over anti-union Scottish council

18/4/18

Newham

Avenue School strikers and parents win judicial review

18/4/18

PCS

Vote for a left, fighting PCS leadership

18/4/18

PCS

PCS rejects Acas offer - further strikes announced

18/4/18

Bromley

Bromley libraries - indefinite strike action continues

18/4/18

Butterfields

Butterfields tenants join TUSC campaign

13/4/18

Cuts

Fighting the cuts to women's services

11/4/18

Health

May elections: a chance to fight attacks on health and social care

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 0798 202 1969

East Mids: 0773 797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 0784 114 4890

North West 07769 611 320

South East: 020 8988 8777

South West: 07759 796 478

Southern: 07833 681910

Wales: 07935 391 947

West Mids: 02476 555 620

Yorkshire: 0114 264 6551

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999