Leicester NHS phone in – socialists v. the rest

GETTING PRESS publicity in election campaigns can be very frustrating,
since the Socialist Party largely gets cut out of the media.

Steve Score, Socialist Party candidate Leicester West

But last week I got on a live radio debate with candidates from the three
main parties, which took phone-in calls from the public. The topic was the NHS.

From the start the Socialist Party set the agenda. The first question was
on MRSA, the hospital "superbug". I pointed out the drop in the number of
cleaners from 100,000 in 1984 to 55,000 today. This is the direct result of
privatisation – cutting costs to boost profits.

Arrogant Tory MP, Alan Duncan, interrupted, trying to throw me off by
saying: "There is no evidence that more infections occur in hospitals where
there are private cleaners compared to the in-house cleaners".

I said that the problem was the contracting out process. To get the
contract even an in-house cleaner would have to put in the cheapest bid,
inevitably having to cut costs.

New Labour candidate Peter Soulsby, former council leader, tried to blame
the Tories for contracting out cleaning.

But Alan Duncan correctly asked: "If Labour thought it was wrong, why
didn’t you reverse it then?" I made it clear that not one of the parties would
reverse privatisation.

When Soulsby said: "Labour are investing £760 million in Leicester’s
hospitals," I pointed out that this was a Private Finance Initiative scheme.
The tax payer will be laying out £2.8 billion for the scheme. Massive profits
made by the company that will own all the hospital buildings and employ most
of the non-clinical staff will be stolen from health care.

At this point the Tories and Labour formed a united front against me in
defence of PFI, showing up the common agenda of all the main parties!


Election
campaign pages