The socialist review

Massaker

Directed by Monika Borgmann and Nina Menkes

Neil Cafferky reviews Massaker, a documentary shown at the Palestine
Film Festival involving interviews with five of the participants in the
destruction of Sabra and Chatila refugee camps during the Lebanese civil
war.

Why would someone shoot a defenceless child? What goes through the
mind of a person just before they lob a grenade into a house full of
people pleading for mercy? Massaker, attempts to answer these questions.

The men involved were members of the Phalange, a Christian militia
headed by Bashir Gemayal. It was one of the main armed groups in
Lebanon’s brutal, many-sided civil war.

Lebanon, then as now, is composed of a population with many ethnic and
religious divisions, in the main a result of the Sykes-Picot Treaty
between the UK and France after the First World War (when the imperialist
countries carved up the Middle East). The treaty included just enough
Muslims in the country so that the Christian ruling class would always
need the support of French (and later US) imperialism to stay in power.

However, due to demographic changes and an influx of Palestinian
refugees, by the mid-1970s Muslims had become the majority. Given the
exploitative nature of capitalism, the struggle for political and
economic power between the different groups meant a gain for one
community was a loss for another.

This set the stage in 1975 for a conflict that was to last 15 years.
In essence, the inability of capitalism to solve the national question in
Lebanon was the underlying cause of the protracted and vicious nature of
its civil war. The story of the men involved shows the viewer just what
happens when society goes into freefall and reaction gains the upper
hand.

What’s most striking is their swaggering machismo – the men see
themselves as an elite brotherhood. In fact they are utterly ordinary in
their villainy – one could easily imagine them in peacetime as the local
street thug or pushy middle-manager.

Instead, under the conditions of war, they are given a license to
kill. Interestingly their particular unit, Forces Lebonaises, was a
Special Forces unit trained by the Israeli army. Much of the hype their
unit surrounds itself with has a chilling parallel with the mystique
which surrounds other groups like the SAS, particularly in films.

In fact, the interviewees even say that their heroes are from Westerns
and action movies. This is a stark reminder of one aspect of the role
that the capitalist entertainment industry plays, promoting as it does a
culture of violence. The consequences are gruesome. One man describes
‘road block duty’ where they would pull Muslims from their cars and
execute them.

Unfortunately, the weaknesses of this ahistorical documentary are
exposed. Why were the men ordered to do this at the start of the war? In
order to stir up communal hatred, trigger a round of blood-letting by
‘the other side’ and thus consolidate the position of the sectarians who
ordered the killings in the first place as ‘defenders of the community’.
The film fails to make this connection so these murders seem to happen
within a void.

Ethnic cleansing

Sectarian hatred is very much on show. When the command is given to
attack the camps, the orders are phrased in terms of ‘cleansing’ the
area. Palestinians are viewed as little better than animals. One man says
his shooting of a woman was self-defence – one day she will have
Palestinian children who will try to kill him, so best to kill her first.

The extent of Israeli connivance is also quite clear. The men’s
commanders consulted with Israeli officers prior to ordering the assault
on Sabra and Chatila. Some of the bulldozers that flattened the camps
after the massacre were driven by Israelis. Although the film relates how
the assassination of Bashir Gemayal triggered the attack two days later,
it fails to explain that Gemayal’s death also spelled the end of Israel’s
hopes of setting up a friendly puppet government in Lebanon.

The massacre is portrayed as simply lashing out by the Phalangists
thirsting for revenge, whereas it was actually a premeditated act of
political terror (as the Israeli Kahane commission investigation
subsequently showed).

If the aim of Massaker is to provide an insight into why people commit
atrocities then it comprehensively fails in this task. It does not give
any sort of historical context which makes the actions of these men
understandable. Instead, the participants are completely divorced from
their historical circumstances. This is a great pity because in some ways
Massaker is quite insightful.

As a socialist I found the men to be living proof of Marx’s prediction
that humanity is faced with the choice between socialism and barbarism.
Their casual disregard for the sufferings of others is a vivid example of
how many of the evils engendered by capitalism – imperialism, war,
sectarianism and sexism – can twist humans into frightening creatures.