The Socialist 12 April 2007

Fight for a socialist alternative

Coventry - Socialist Party's track record

'Climate change will hit poorest of poor hardest'

Nuclear power is not the answer

Is the Green Party heading left or right?

Battling over the world's oil reserves

Join the International Youth Camp

France: Workers need to build a Left alternative

Workers' lives get tougher under New Labour

Campaign for a New Workers' Party

Why legal aid should be defended

Blair silent on Guantanamo

Union leaders out of touch with teachers' discontent

NUJ: Build on the victories

Fury at jobs massacre

UNISON and PCS: Vote for fighting, democratic unions

PCS: All out on 1 May

Zimbabwe: State thugs crackdown on protests

Previous issues, etc

Print this issue

PO Box 1398, Enfield EN1 9GT

020 8988 8777

[email protected]g.uk

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/482/2277

Search the site	Printable version

Home | The Socialist 12 April 2007 | Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe | Donate

'Climate change will hit poorest of poor hardest'

International socialist action needed

Climate change demo December 2005, photo Paul Mattsson

In February a UN-sponsored international committee of scientists, the IPCC, issued Part One of a report that concluded that climate change had started, was a result of human activity (principally the burning of fossil fuels: coal, gas and oil), and was likely to get worse.

Dave Nellist at Socialist Party congress, photo Paul Mattsson

Cllr Dave Nellist, Chair, Campaign for a New Workers' Party

Part Two was released in Brussels on 6 April and spelt out the consequences of unmitigated global warming. IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri predicted "it's the poorest of the poor in the world, and this includes poor people even in prosperous societies, who are going to be worst hit".

The report speaks of extra energy in weather systems, brought about by rising temperatures (caused by increased greenhouse gases), adding to the frequency, or intensifying the effects, of famines, water shortages, extreme weather and floods.

Temperature rises at the poles will lead to increased sea levels and threaten hundreds of millions with coastal and tidal river flooding - from Bangladesh to London. Some studies have already linked the loss of sea ice in the Arctic to changes in rainfall patterns in southern and western Europe.

Climate change demo December 2005, photo Paul Mattsson

No continent will be immune from climate change, but perhaps Africa is one of the most vulnerable. The IPCC report warns that by 2020 between 75 million and 250 million people in Africa will be exposed "to an increase in water-stress"; basically seeing longer and more severe drought.

Both floods and drought could lead to huge increases in migration and refugees as tens, perhaps hundreds, of millions of people move to escape.

If average temperatures rise by a further 1.5¡C - 2.5¡C, then the report predicts 20% to 30% of all plant and animal species would be "at high risk of irreversible extinction".

The IPCC report is based on the work of thousands of scientists. But the final version was a product of pressure from politicians particularly from the US, Saudi Arabia, China and Russia, and was 'edited', in reality, toned down to deflect calls for action.

However, more and more people are concluding that urgent action must be taken to cut harmful greenhouse gas pollution. But against the tide of public opinion are the interests of the owners and shareholders in transport, energy and wider industry who do not want any reduction in their profits.

For example, just two weeks after New Labour issued its draft Climate Change Bill in March, new figures showed how big privately-owned power stations in the UK by switching fuel in 2006 from dearer gas to cheaper coal had contributed to a 1.15% rise in CO2 output, at a time when the Labour government's spin was all about cutting greenhouse gases!

On the Climate change demo, a Socialist Party campaign stall, December 2005, photo Paul Mattsson

Such is the weakness of the New Labour government's business-friendly strategy that, just as with the NHS, Labour are now - incredibly - allowing the Tories to appear more radical. Tory leader David Cameron is considering a target of a 80% cut in carbon emissions on the 1990 levels by 2050, compared to Labour's 60%.

But in reality, on a capitalist basis, any of the three big parties would rely on 'the market' to deliver cuts in emissions. Any capitalist party will also do so at the expense of workers' jobs in so-called 'dirty industries', or by bigger taxes on ordinary people's energy and transport.

Socialists, on the other hand, will fight climate change with a programme of rational planning of resources, based on public ownership and public good - not private profit - and by the international action of millions of ordinary people seeking to build a planet with a sustainable, socialist future.

Without international socialist action billions of people face shortages of food and water, extreme weather and floods. Building an international working class alternative to unmitigated climate change is an urgent necessity.

In this issue

Fight for a socialist alternative