The Socialist 21 July 2010

Warning: NHS under attack

Warning: NHS under attack

Youth and students: organise to fight for a future

Class struggles on the rise

Stand united, fight the cuts!

Lessons of the cuts

Education workers must teach Tories a lesson

Fast news

Union recommends BT pay deal

Stop the courts closures

Wales: No to fire service cuts

Strike action wins at Tube Lines

Swansea Linamar

Cuts blogger!

PCS: a strategy to stop the cuts

TUC refuses national demo

Unite the struggle to defend pensions

Con-Dems propose denationalisation of the NHS

The Socialist Party needs you!

More join the Socialist Party in Yorkshire

Funding the socialist fightback

Building new workers' parties and the tasks of socialists

Egypt: Thousands protest over brutal police killing

Harder work, longer hours... All part and parcel?

A testing 'pudding' for councillors

Keep probation services public

Previous issues, etc

Print this issue

PO Box 1398, Enfield EN1 9GT

020 8988 8777

[email protected]

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/633/10008

Search the site	Printable version

Home | The Socialist 21 July 2010 | Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe | Donate

A testing 'pudding' for councillors

THE EDITORIAL about united action to stop the cuts (The Socialist 632) was spot on. I am writing on the question of involving Labour councillors in anti-cuts campaigns.

Rob Windsor, Coventry East Branch

Coventry Labour councillors pushed through pay cuts in 1999-2000 as part of a "single status" deal , threatening compulsory redundancy to workers who did not sign the new contracts.

If these councillors came to an anti-cuts event today, saying "Hi, sisters and brothers aren't the Tories rotten - I want to lead your campaign," I would be seriously concerned.

Just as I would if Labour councillors who cut eligibility for social care, voted to sell off all our council housing and voted to shut schools did the same.

In Coventry, every Labour councillor voted for what was then until last May, a Tory controlled council's Medium Term Financial Strategy proposing £72 million in cuts over three years.

And this was all under a Labour government. In our city only the Socialist Party councillors opposed and voted against all of the above.

No-one can stop Labour councillors coming to or speaking at events. A few will have resisted Blairite cuts, but this number is very small. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. I propose the following "pudding" for Labour councillors who say they "oppose" cuts, and want a position in anti-cuts campaigns.

Quite simply, they pledge to campaign vigorously within their Labour groups to commit their councils to a 'no cuts' policy and one of campaigning with other councils for government funds to keep services running.

They never vote for cuts and never vote for or support privatisation in any form. Also, they attend protests and support all strikes and call for a levy on councillors to back anti-cuts campaigning.

The test for them will be the period from October to budget setting in around February 2011, as well as any interim cuts proposals.

If they happily eat this particular pudding, they would have some credibility in anti-cuts campaigns. But all most of these people are interested in is getting elected in the hope that the Con-Demolition coalition's antics mask their previous rotten role in cuts and sell offs.

In this issue

Warning: NHS under attack