Wealth Gap Widens Under Blair


Build a
socialist alternative

The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) latest report, ‘The State of
the Nation’ confirms what we know only too well – Britain is deeply divided.

Manny Thain

And the wealth gap is widening. When the IPPR published a report into
social justice a decade ago, Tony Blair said it would inform his policies. At
the time, many people assumed that this meant he would attempt to alleviate
poverty. Instead, New Labour rules in the interests of big business.

"Between 1990 and 2000 the percentage of wealth held by the wealthiest 10%
of the population increased from 47% to 54%", states the report.

Comparisons with other countries are no more favourable: "In 2001 – the
last year for which international figures are available – 23% of children in
Britain were living in households earning below 60% of median income, compared
to just 5% in Denmark, 10% in Sweden, 14% in Germany."

The report makes clear the link between poverty and social inequality: "The
poorest continue to be more likely to suffer from crime and the fear of crime.
Around 4.8% of individuals earning under £5,000 a year were burgled in 2003/04
compared with approximately 2.7% of those earning over £30,000." Deprived
areas suffer the worst effects of environmental degradation.

New Labour years ago turned its back on the working class. And the
consequences of this are far-reaching, and show up in the IPPR report:

"Interest in politics has fallen slightly across all social classes, but
there is a growing class divide. Between 1991 and 1999 for social classes D
and E interest in politics halved."

It is not so much the case, however, that working-class people have lost
interest in politics, but have been disenfranchised. People disillusioned with
Blair’s social and economic policies, and his prosecution of brutal war and
subjugation of the Iraqi people have been abstaining from voting in elections
in record numbers.

In reality, the IPPR report illustrates the vital necessity for a new mass
workers’ party. Armed with a democratic socialist programme it could genuinely
represent working-class people. It could be set up by the trade unions,
including those which currently fund New Labour. The fight against poverty
means giving not a penny more to this union-bashing, privatising, bosses’
party.