spotCampaigns

spotOrganisations

spotArguments for socialism

spotPeople

spotInternational

spotEvents

spotAround the UK


All keywords


All Campaigns subcategories:

Anti-capitalism

Anti-fascist

Anti-racism

Anti-war

Asylum

Black and Asian

Children

CNWP

Corporate crime

Disability

* Education

Election campaigns

Environment

EU

Finance

Food

Gender Recognition Act

Health and safety

Health and welfare

Housing

Human Rights

LGBT Pride

Local government

Local services

Low pay

Migration

Nationalisation

New workers party

NHS

Pensions

Post Office

Poverty

Privatisation

Public Services

Socialism

Socialist

Sport

Stop the slaughter of Tamils

Students

The state

Transport

TUSC

Welfare rights

Women

Workplace and TU campaigns

Youth


Education keywords:

Academies (188)

Classroom assistants (8)

College (273)

Colleges (91)

Council (2229)

ESOL (5)

Education (1080)

Free Schools (16)

Grant (33)

Higher Education (76)

Medway (12)

Ofsted (16)

Performance (31)

Performance-related (7)

SATs (25)

School (580)

Schools (408)

Students (1217)

Teachers (480)

Teaching assistants (29)

Universities (148)

Performance


19 August 2014

Search site for keywords: Telecoms - Strike - CWU - BT - Performance

BT CWU members vote for strike action in latest consultation

By a CWU Telecoms member

At the last CWU conference, a debate saw delegates, based on their branch experiences and caseload, conclude that the national agreements in place on Performance Management were not working and that the process was still punitive, with managers not being reined in.
They opposed the Telecoms Executive who wanted the agreements to be given more time to work and demanded a strike ballot on the issue.

This came after the CWU had come within 'a whisker' of an industrial action ballot two times in the last three years. Delegates' patience, reflecting pressure from members and lay officers, had finally run out.

A motion demanded that if members did not see improvements by July, a move to ballot for industrial action would commence. The Executive responded by mailing out a "consultation" survey to all affected members across all BT groups. They asked three questions.

The mail-out was very much an appeal to give the Executive more time. Not dissimilar to material from BT HR and Employee Relations at work, members were implored to read the material and make a "very important" decision. Both the CWU and BT management were desperately hoping that members would 'see sense' as they implored yet more 'partnership'.

Based on their experiences, 80% of members had, for question 1, seen no improvement since the last survey in 2013. Then it had been that 93% had seen no improvement. So in one year, things had only improved for 13% - evidence, if any were needed, that the agreements have delivered little if any change on the shop floor.

Question 2 saw 61% of members wanting to give the existing agreements more time to improve the culture in BT.

Question 3, the big one, saw 57% desire a ballot for industrial action now.

The turnout was 28%.

Desire for action

Question 3, amongst those returning papers, saw the highest number of responses for and against than each of the other two. This showed that this question was, in members' minds, the most immediate and important one to them.

That 72% of members didn't return papers shows that rather than not concerned, they are tired of being surveyed, tired of working in an environment where nothing seems to change for the better. They didn't see the CWU as being serious enough to warrant their attention.

Given the woeful absence and outright unwillingness to embark on any serious campaigning nationally against Performance Management over the years by the union, it is a testimony to members' determination to fight that 57% who voted still demanded a ballot for action. It also vindicates the conference decision of branch delegates to oppose the Executive's position.

A sober analysis of the results shows that the picture is not contradictory at all. CWU members in BT want a successful industrial action ballot result that can be used in negotiations to get the boot off their throats. If BT refuses then members want to walk, to force the company's hand if necessary. This is the only action ultimately that BT understands and members know it.

Failings of Telecoms union leaders

Branch officers and reps have burgeoning casework files, a testimony to the successive failure of the CWU Telecoms Executive to defend members from the Performance Management regime.

In the branches there is a growing consensus that the CWU in BT, at a national level, is no more than a glorified Staff Association. A feeling driven no less where local branches have a good record of representing members in disciplinary meetings.

It is not uncommon now for overburdened branch officers to visit Head Office and come away wondering how clear the desks look there when compared to theirs back home.

BT senior managers have made the mistake of thinking that the people they see at negotiations actually reflect the workplace. This consultation ballot result is a wake-up call to both parties that both the employer's and CWU Executive's joint initiative to dissuade members from Industrial action has failed.

Confident campaign needed

The Executive should now be pressed by branches to initiate the industrial action ballot. With a confident campaign, the 72% who did not participate this time could be swung round. A successful vote for action could then be used in negotiations.

Branches need to convene members' meetings and initiate a campaign to oppose any further Executive inaction. Such a campaign is essential and the need immediate.

The mood is such in some workplaces that local management could spark unofficial action which could rapidly spread nationally, such is the discontent in some places.
However, this mood may not be universal, for example in some smaller or isolated workplaces where local managers may have been more pragmatic in implementing Performance Management.

Unofficial action always carries the risk that workers are left open to victimisation by a vicious national management and compliant CWU Executive once the action ceases.

At base is the future of the CWU in BT. If the union can't deliver on this issue then members will increasingly feel that maintaining membership is no longer worthwhile.

The union has to be reclaimed for members as part and parcel of the campaign to get the Executive to ballot for industrial action.

The CWU Executive now proposes more meetings with BT and yet another survey, this time alongside Prospect, the managers' union. This is not what members want, and it is not what conference voted for. It doesn't even fit in with the needs of Prospect members! Both CWU and Prospect members want action, want the boot taken off the throat, not death by survey.

The CWU Executive must initiate the ballot for industrial action over Performance Management now!


Appendix - Vote breakdown

Q1. 11,086 members answered the question. 2,205 (20%) said yes, 8,881 (80%) said no.

Q2. 11,149 members answered the question. 6,788 (61%) said yes, 4,361 (39%) said no.

Q3. 11,242 members answered the question. 6,374 (57%) said yes, 4,868 (39%) said no.







Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


January 2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999