spotCampaigns

spotOrganisations

spotArguments for socialism

spotPeople

spotInternational

spotEvents

spotAround the UK


All keywords


All Campaigns subcategories:

Anti-capitalism

Anti-fascist

Anti-racism

Anti-war

Asylum

Black and Asian

Children

CNWP

Corporate crime

Disability

Education

Election campaigns

* Environment

EU

Finance

Food

Gender Recognition Act

Health and safety

Health and welfare

Housing

Human Rights

LGBT Pride

Local government

Local services

Low pay

Migration

Nationalisation

New workers party

NHS

Pensions

Post Office

Poverty

Privatisation

Public Services

Socialism

Socialist

Sport

Stop the slaughter of Tamils

Students

The state

Transport

TUSC

Welfare rights

Women

Workplace and TU campaigns

Youth


Environment keywords:

Animal rights (6)

Bali (5)

Biofuel (2)

Biofuels (7)

Carbon (55)

Carbon trading (1)

Climate change (270)

Earthquake (26)

Eco-socialism (2)

Electricity (16)

Energy (235)

Environment (201)

Fires (15)

Flooding (33)

Forests (6)

Fracking (58)

Gas (112)

Global warming (96)

Heathrow airport (15)

IPCC (26)

Incinerator (14)

Kyoto Agreement (5)

Landfill (8)

Methane (3)

Nuclear power (54)

Recycling (25)

Renewables (8)

Sarp (1)

Sellafield (9)

Stern (4)

Tsunami (28)

Waste (48)

Wind power (3)

Windscale (4)

IPCC


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article
From: The Socialist issue 631, 30 June 2010: Only one choice... Fight Back!

Search site for keywords: Global warming - Big business - Energy - BP - IPCC - Climate change

Challenging the global warming sceptics

"The majority of the British public is still not convinced that climate change is caused by humans", the Guardian reported on 22 June. In a certain sense, the majority are right - global warming is not caused by humans as a whole, but by big business, like BP.

Pete Mason

If polling companies asked, "Do you think that big business pollutes the planet?" or "Are big business companies like BP putting short term profit before the long term interests of the planet?", most people are likely to answer "yes", particularly since the BP oil rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico.

If BP can be forced to set up a $20 billion fund to pay compensation claims for the Gulf of Mexico disaster, why can't all the big oil and energy companies set up a fund to convert the world to carbon free energy sources, such as wind, solar, and wave power? They could, but they won't.

People become sceptical of government claims - and scientific claims - when the real perpetrators of the carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution which is threatening our planet try to pass the blame on to the hard working, under-paid and over-taxed population.

"Some people [were] saying politicians were not doing enough to tackle the problem, even though they were cynical about government attempts to impose regulations or raise taxes" the Guardian's environment editor, Juliette Jowit, has written. She finds this contradictory, but why should the working class pay for capitalist pollution? And when have government regulations imposed on big business been effective?

Lying behind the recent upsurge in cynicism in the science of global warming are the ferocious attempts by global warming sceptics, often funded by big business, to undermine the reports of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). And it is true that their microscopic analysis of every claim has turned up a few errors:

The glaciers are not disappearing as rapidly as was reported by the IPCC. This is good news for the billions of people who rely on the melt waters of the Himalayas for their water.

The Pacific islands are not being overrun with rising tides (yet) because their islands are growing (Shape-shifting islands defy sea-level rise, New Scientist, 2 June 2010). However the growth of the islands, caused by an effect of global warming, is not necessarily taking place where the populations are. Towns are still being inundated and people are forced to move.

Sunspots have a greater warming effect on the earth's climate than previously thought, as some climate sceptics had argued, and over the last two or three years the sun has gone unusually quiet (What's Up Sunshine, New Scientist, 12 June 2010).

This may continue, having a cooling effect on the earth's climate, but no one yet knows whether it will overcome global warming, or for how long. Recently, sunspots have begun to reappear, and may return with renewed vigour, threatening to disrupt satellite communication systems.

Evidence

But the evidence of environmentally damaging global warming continues to outweigh that of the sceptics:

2009 was "only a fraction of a degree cooler than 2005, the warmest year on record, and tied with a cluster of other years - 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006 and 2007 - as the second warmest year since recordkeeping began" according to NASA.

In the Southern Hemisphere, 2009 was the warmest year since modern records began in 1880.

The last decade (2000 to 2009) was far and away the hottest on record, with six record-breaking years.

Arctic Sea Ice Volume chart from PIOMAS (Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System), photo PIOMAS (Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System)

Arctic Sea Ice Volume chart from PIOMAS (Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System), photo PIOMAS (Pan-Arctic Ice-Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System)   (Click to enlarge)

In the summer of 2009, the volume of ice in the arctic sea shrunk to the lowest on record, dropping precipitously (see chart). The winter arctic ice extended further than the record year of 2007, so climate sceptics claimed it was "returning to normal", but it was much thinner than usual.

The thin winter arctic sea ice is now melting at record rates. May 2010 saw the fastest decline in the satellite record. Whether the arctic sea ice cap will shrink below the 2007 record for the whole summer is unknown but throughout June 2010 to date, the ice extent has been significantly lower than previous record lows.

The 'tipping point' in the arctic has been reached and has tipped. It has entered what the director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center called a "death spiral". The north pole could be ice free in the summer months by 2020.

With the disappearing ice cap no longer reflecting the sun's light, the planet warms quicker and the melting of the Greenland ice sheet accelerates. Sea levels rise faster than predicted by the IPCC, bringing further flooding disasters to Bangladesh and other low lying countries, raising the stakes for the Pacific islanders once again, and melting the glaciers in the Himalayas at a faster rate.

It is more important than ever that socialists expose the link between capitalism and global warming, and build a movement to force governments to act, or to replace them if they will not, with socialist governments that put oil and other energy companies under democratic public ownership and control, and use their resources to develop renewable energy.







Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 079 8202 1969

East Mids: 077 3797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 078 4114 4890

North West 079 5437 6096

South West: 077 5979 6478

Southern: 078 3368 1910

Wales: 079 3539 1947

West Mids: 024 7655 5620

Yorkshire: 077 0671 0041

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


February 2020

January 2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999