Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/15592

Posted on 30 October 2012 at 14:33 GMT

Disabled people, family members and anti-cuts campaigners took a protest to the Atos assessment centre in Swansea, Feb 2012,  photo Swansea Socialist Party

Disabled people, family members and anti-cuts campaigners took a protest to the Atos assessment centre in Swansea, Feb 2012, photo Swansea Socialist Party   (Click to enlarge)

The 'hardest hit' are being hammered - fight all cuts to benefits and services

By a disabled activist

'The Tipping Point', a new report by the Hardest Hit coalition, points to the huge impact the Tory/Liberal government coalition's cuts to benefits, welfare spending and central government funding of local authorities are having on disabled people.

This latter issue is addressed in more detail in the recent 'Holes in the Safety Net' report by Disability Rights UK (DRUK), Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) and the Children's Society, which points out:

The Tory/Liberal coalition claims that 100,000 families with disabled children, 230,000 disabled people who live alone, and 116,000 who work more than 16 hours a week will get Transitional Protection, ie their current benefit levels will be frozen until the much lower levels of Universal Credit catch up.

However, this could mean years of living on the same income despite steep rises in the cost of living.

Inadequate demands

Instead of opposing the introduction of Universal Credit, DRUK, CAB and the Children's Society only call for: a limited group of disabled children to have their additional support protected if the Con-Dems press ahead with their changes; additional support for childcare costs for families with disabled children; the introduction of a self-care addition to Universal Credit if SDP is abolished; and additional disability support for working age adults found 'fit to work'.

Hardest Hit Protest: Disabled people and their families protest in central London against government spending cuts, Sept 2012,  photo Paul Mattsson

Hardest Hit Protest: Disabled people and their families protest in central London against government spending cuts, Sept 2012, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge)

In the demands of 'The Tipping Point', the Hardest Hit coalition calls for disabled people and their families not to lose out in cash terms (which the Con-Dems have already guaranteed) and for the government to "urgently reconsider" the abolition of SDP and the disability elements of Child and Working Tax Credits.

It also maintains the fiction that systems designed to remove billions of pounds of disability and incapacity benefits have the capacity to change by calling for the WCA to be reformed rather than abolished.

Remarkably the Hardest Hit coalition also calls upon the government to learn from the WCA and ensure the new PIPs assessment is as fair as possible.

Supposedly the Tory/Liberal coalition can do this by taking into account the full range of disabling barriers and health conditions; make the assessment process as simple, transparent and proportionate as possible; and ensure robust evaluation and monitoring processes are in place.

Basic measures the Con-Dems have failed to take when implementing the WCA, as hundreds of thousands of people can testify to, to their enormous cost.

The leadership of the UK Disabled People's Council (UKDPC) and the charities running the Hardest Hit campaign have learnt nothing from the humiliation of the Lords peers in February whose strategy of making limited changes to the welfare reform bill was shown to be a failed one from the start.

Their amendments were voted down, and the 'financial privilege' rule was used by the Tory/Liberal coalition to prevent any further challenges.

Grassroots anger

When 5,000 disabled people and their supporters demonstrated in London on 11 May 2011, and then as many in regional protests five months later on 22 October, they were absolutely opposed to the welfare reform bill.

A mass campaign could and should have been built in every town and city against this bill. The limited demands and actions of the UKDPC, DRUK and the Hardest Hit coalition since May 2011 reflect the acceptance by a small layer of charity directors and activists that nothing can be done to stop the Con-Dems' austerity policies except minimise their impact.

The final demand of the Hardest Hit coalition is to call for "a lasting solution to the crisis in social care, which has endured years of chronic under-funding, by implementing the recommendations of the Dilnot Commission".

This means supporting the removal of social care from those with 'moderate' needs, accepting that people over their lifetime will have to pay tens of thousands of pounds towards their care and personal assistance, and only demanding an investment of £2 billion in social care when £1.89 billion has been cut by councils in the last two years alone.

Independent Living Fund

But what is glaring is the exclusion in 'The Tipping Point' of any demand to save the Independent Living Fund (ILF) which the Tory/Liberal coalition intends to close by 2015.

If this significant source of care and personal assistance funding for 19,000 severely disabled people closes, where local authority 'maximum expenditure policies' exist, those who need constant 24/7 support will be forced into residential care unless they get additional help through the NHS.

To stop the closure of the ILF means building a campaign that sets out to defeat the Tory/Liberal coalition.

If DRUK, UKDPC and the Hardest Hit coalition were associated with such a perspective it would raise uncomfortable questions for them about the failure so far to make any kind of dent in the Tory/Liberal attacks, and their unwillingness to campaign for the abolition of the misnamed 'welfare reform' policy and the WCA, and oppose the introduction of Universal Credit and PIPs.

DRUK's active support for the closure of the Remploy factories with the resulting sacking of 1,700 disabled workers illustrates where collaboration with the Con-Dems' agenda can lead.

Link all struggles

Disabled people and their families are already being hit very hard by cuts to local health, social care and community services; and cuts to incapacity, mobility, care and housing benefits are still to impact on millions.

By linking with the trade unions and the anti-cuts movement, opposition to the Tory/Liberal attacks can still be built that will stop and reverse them.

Whatever form opposition to the Con-Dems takes, it is vital that disabled activists also demand that the Labour Party drops its support for 'welfare reform' and the associated policies now being implemented, many of which originated under the Blair and Brown Labour governments.

At a local level we must campaign to build mass opposition to the cuts and for Labour-led councils to refuse to wield the 'little axe'.

Where they refuse, we must help build an anti-cuts electoral alternative through the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC).

The Socialist Party calls for:


This version of this article was first posted on the Socialist Party website on 30 October 2012 and may vary slightly from the version subsequently printed in The Socialist.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.

Facebook   Twitter








Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter



Related links:

Disability:

triangleLetter to the Tories who tell me to 'work hard and strive'

triangleCon-Dems' benefit fact fraud

triangleCon-Dems' latest cruel cut: Disability Living Allowance

triangleSwansea Socialist Party: Disability rights

triangleDisability hate crimes - accomplices and victims

Benefits:

triangleCuts kill: Con-Dem benefit 'reforms', mental health and suicide

triangleOne in five borrow to buy food

triangleThe 'precariat': fighting for real jobs

triangleIDS' 'wealthy pensioners' smoke screen

Cuts:

triangleFighting cuts in wales

triangleTories in turmoil over Europe

triangleNHS staff under the cuts cosh

Disabled:

triangleBedroom tax non-implementation

triangleWaltham Forest victims of bedroom tax are 'up for a fight'

Welfare:

triangleTories and press use Philpott case to attack 'welfare culture'

Work Capability Assessment:

triangleScrap 'fitness tests' targeting sick and disabled people says PCS

Employment and Support Allowance:

triangleFrom pillar to post: reassessment for ESA

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

23/5/13

Post Office

Fifth post office strike on Tuesday

23/5/13

Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan - solidarity needed

22/5/13

Southampton

Southampton TUSC rally

22/5/13

London

London march to save the NHS

22/5/13

Northern Ireland

March against the G8

22/5/13

POA

POA conference - Prisons should not be run for profit

22/5/13

Cuts

Cuts kill: Con-Dem benefit 'reforms', mental health and suicide

22/5/13

Legal aid

Strike against legal aid cuts

22/5/13

Yorkshire

Support for Mid Yorkshire Health struggle in the Mirror

22/5/13

Blacklisting

Anti-blacklisting campaigner run over

22/5/13

NHS

NHS staff under the cuts cosh

22/5/13

Bedroom tax

Bedroom tax campaigning in Leytonstone, Birmingham and Newham

22/5/13

Merseyside

Anti-bedroom tax federation launched in Merseyside

22/5/13

Workfare

Another blow for workfare

22/5/13

Thera

Fighting back pays off: Thera East Midlands forced to make concessions

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...

triangle23 May No to terrorism! No to racism! No to war!

Sue Atkins, Southampton council TUSC candidate, photo Southampton Socialist Party

triangle22 May Southampton TUSC rally

We are the 99% - Take the wealth off the 1% Socialist Party placard, photo Paul Mattsson

triangle22 May Big business tax avoidance scandal

Leeds Mid Shelley anti-Bedroom tax demonstration

triangle22 May End this 'evil bedroom tax'

triangle22 May March against the G8

triangle22 May Strike against legal aid cuts

triangle22 May Fighting cuts in wales

More ...

triangle28 May Birmingham Socialist Party: Climate change and the environment

triangle30 May Waltham Forest Socialist Party: Marxist economics

triangle30 May York Socialist Party: The history of the CWI

More ...

Archive

Categories

1-9 

1-9 


Select articles from month:

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005

July 2005

June 2005

May 2005

April 2005

March 2005

February 2005

January 2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

July 2003

June 2003

May 2003

April 2003

March 2003

December 2001

November 2001

October 2001

September 2001

August 2001

July 2001

June 2001

May 2001

April 2001

March 2001

February 2001

January 2001

December 2000

November 2000

October 2000

September 2000

August 2000

July 2000

June 2000

May 2000

April 2000

March 2000

February 2000

January 2000

December 1999

Legal   |   RSS feed RSS

Platform setting: = No platform choice