spotArt

spotCommercial

spotCommittee for a Workers International

spotGovernment

spotLabour Party

spotLeft and radical

spotMedia

spotNationalist and National Liberation

spotPro capitalist and Imperialist

spotReligious

spotSocial Networks

spotSocialist Party

spotSport

spotTrade Union

spotVoluntary & non-profit


All keywords


Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Left and radical keywords:

ANC (44)

Coalition of Resistance (7)

ControCorrente (2)

Diggers (2)

EZLN (2)

FSLN (1)

Fascism (61)

Green (126)

Green Party (34)

Haldane (4)

ISR (103)

International Socialist Resistance (54)

Left Party (12)

Lutte Ouvrière (1)

Maoist (3)

Maoists (5)

Momentum (80)

Nation of Islam (1)

P-sol (6)

PKK (13)

Peoples Assembly (8)

Podemos (17)

Respect (45)

Revolutionary Communist League (1)

SWP (75)

Sandinistas (1)

Scottish Socialist Party (23)

Socialist (6154)

Socialist Alliance (29)

Socialist Party (5462)

Socialist Peoples Party (Denmark) (1)

Socialist Students (446)

Socialist Workers Party (46)

Solidarity (303)

Stand Up to Racism (1)

Syriza (54)

TUSC (999)

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (489)

Turc-k (1)

UAF (15)

Unite Against Fascism (10)

WASG (15)

WASP (19)

World Social Forum (12)

Young Socialists (3)

Zapatista (2)

Green Party


Highlight keywords  |Print this articlePrint this article
From: The Socialist issue 796, 29 January 2014: Recovery? More Tory lies!

Search site for keywords: Green Party - Green - Cuts - Brighton - Council - Government - Hove

Brighton Green Party referendum offers no alternative to cuts

Paul Moorhouse, Brighton and Hove Socialist Party

Brighton and Hove's Green Party leader Jason Kitcat wants to follow up last year's attack on the city's bin workers' wages with further cuts in the council's 2014-15 budget.

If successful, this would mean that his administration, elected on a mandate to 'resist austerity', has cut £50 million from jobs and services in the city in three years.

There is no question that the primary responsibility for cuts in local government services lies with the Con-Dem government's austerity programme.

The proposal by the Greens to increase council tax by 4.75%, however, is no defence in the face of this attack.

This tax increase would raise £2.75 million more than December's draft budget. But that budget proposed £22.56 million in spending cuts threatening the jobs of 100-150 council workers.

In other words the Green administration would be asking the voters of Brighton to swallow a rise of almost 5% in their council tax bills as the price for still accepting nine tenths of the cuts in jobs and services demanded by Pickles and the Con-Dem government.

These would come on top of £30 million worth of Tory cuts which the Green Party has passed on to workers and service users in the city since coming to power in 2011.

Not surprisingly the Tory local government minister Brandon Lewis MP fully supports the Greens' move.

This shows that it is not the case, as Green Party national leader Natalie Bennett has claimed, that: "Instead of letting Whitehall impose cuts on vulnerable people in Brighton and Hove, this announcement takes the decision to the people."

By playing along with the spending limits imposed by Pickles and the millionaire Eton boot boys in the Con-Dem cabinet, Brighton's Green Party is ensuring that the only possible outcome of the referendum is either:

In other words, whatever Natalie Bennett and Jason Kitcat claim, either way, the referendum can only lead to "Whitehall imposing cuts on vulnerable people in Brighton and Hove."

The referendum would also be a highly divisive exercise in 'divide and rule': pitting 'council tax payers', against 'council workers' and 'service users' when the reality is that resisting the cuts requires that we stand united (indeed, most often we are the same people, anyway!).

If we accept the Greens' 'dented shield' analysis, which says that nine-tenths of the cuts are inevitable, we will end up engaging in a vicious 'race to the bottom'.

This would pit 'education' against 'housing' and children's services against services for older people and the disabled in a struggle to become the lucky 'one in ten' to escape Councillor Kitcat's axe. Instead we should be standing together and resisting ALL CUTS.

Brighton's Labour councillors are proposing a 'vote of no confidence' in the Green administration. Not because they oppose the cuts but because they want to carry out more cuts! Labour want an 'all party administration' to implement the Con-Dem coalition's cuts in full for 2014-15, and for 2015-16. This would inevitably lead to even more losses in jobs and services.

Second question

Socialists should argue for a second question in the referendum asking the electorate in Brighton if they would rather the council defied the government and refused to implement the cuts, instead of choosing between tax increases and slightly smaller cuts or cuts alone.

Imagine if our councillors explained that adequate funding for Brighton's schools, bins and recycling (which are still reeling from the 'settlement' of last year's strike and the botched 'reorganisation' forced through by Kitcat and senior managers), housing and care services should have priority over the governments' pro-super rich austerity agenda.

In this way, councillors could build a mass movement of resistance and unite council workers, services users and Brighton's communities to force Pickles to return the money stolen from our city.

Today there is an alternative, which the Socialist Party, the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition, Brighton Trades Council and Brighton Stop the Cuts Coalition have urged on the Green administration since it was first elected.

Brighton and Hove Council should set a 'needs budget' and link up with the trade unions to campaign for central government to return the £70 million plus which has been cut from central government allocations to the city since 2010.

This was what the socialist-led council did in Liverpool in the 1980s. Not only did they force the Thatcher government to increase funding for services but they expanded the council's workforce at a time of rising unemployment and built 5,000 new council houses (more than were built by councils in the whole of the rest of England and Wales in the same period).

Why not put that idea to a referendum vote?






Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Related links:

Green Party:

triangleCanterbury Socialist Party attends 'I, Daniel Blake' film night

triangleUniversal basic income - what do socialists say?

triangleConservatives humiliated in Richmond

triangleTrump victory: Failure of the Democrat establishment

triangleAustria - Hofer defeated, but far-right threat remains

Green:

triangleUSA: Historic vote for Ginger Jentzen campaign in Minneapolis

triangleCardiff East Socialist Party: Why you have to be Red to be Green

triangleDon't wreck our rec! Campaigning to save green space in Standish

triangleInterest at Nottingham Green festival

Cuts:

triangleBradford campaign to save children's services launched

triangleSouth London health bosses' cover-up

triangleTotnes MP uses coffin controversy to distract from brutal NHS cuts

Brighton:

triangleBrighton victory

triangleBrighton Uni lecturers strike against job cuts

Council:

triangleBlairite council 'all ears' to rich property developers

Government:

triangle110 years ago: massacre at Santa Maria school in Chile - commemorate 21 December 1907

Hove:

triangleDeliveroo cedes ground in Brighton dispute