Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/301/13792

From The Socialist newspaper, 24 May 2003

Amicus, The Political Fund And New Labour

'Political fund - who needs it?' That is the question asked in the current Amicus-MSF journal, as we prepare to vote on the retention or otherwise of the union's political fund. This ballot is required by law every ten years.

Mick Cotter, Amicus-MSF London Region Craft MM

This is a law introduced by the Tories to obstruct workers in their desire for political representation. There are no comparable restrictions on businesses. Therefore I am opposed to this law; we should be entitled to do what we choose with our union funds.

However, this current debate is not going to revolve around the historical reasons behind this law, it is primarily going to focus on the union's funding of New Labour.

The literature circulating within the union deliberately downplays the extent of MSF spending on New Labour for obvious reasons. In my estimation the union probably spends upwards of 90% of its political fund on New Labour in one way or another. But it is New Labour attacking our members' working conditions through things like PFI, Agenda for Change, Foundation Hospitals to name but a few.

Amicus-MSF boasts 80 New Labour MPs in its parliamentary group, a good number of whom vote consistently against the spirit of many of MSF conference policies, as well as issues reflecting general principled trade unionism.

How many of them opposed Prescott's bill restricting FBU members' union rights? This would be New Labour's GCHQ [when the Tories withdrew trade union rights from workers at its secret communications establishment] if it becomes law.

But what of our union's leadership? Rather than take New Labour to task in any meaningful way they continue to cosy up and make excuses for them.

It will come as no surprise then that members equate the political fund ballot with the record of New Labour and many are undoubtedly going to register a protest by either voting 'No' or abstaining.

I am not in favour of non-political unions, we should be funding parties and individuals who represent our members' interests. As New Labour no longer fits that bill with its pro-big business agenda, then we need to engage in the process of creating a new mass workers' party.

The problem is that this is not an issue which can be solved overnight. One immediate obstacle is the following rule which has a distinct possibility of being carried as part of a whole new rule book, (individual rules are not amendable) at our annual conference, as part of the new merged union of MSF/AEEU which forms Amicus. It is also proposed that rules can be amended in 2005 but thereafter only every six years.

"The union and any body or part of the union shall not affiliate to or give support to the candidates of any other political party in Great Britain other than the Labour Party. Each branch of the union in Great Britain shall be entitled to affiliate and elect delegates to Constituency Labour Parties."

The journal poses a number of questions as well as informing members that even if they vote for the fund they can individually opt out of paying it. Unfortunately, the central problem of New Labour remains unmentioned. There is a danger that activists can be a bit over-sophisticated within the union structures whereas ordinary members tend to take a more direct view.

Campaigns can be instigated to change union policy and rules but it can take time. Will that satisfy health workers who are suffering now as a direct result of government policy? Meanwhile as a union we continue to feed the dog that bites our hand.

By voting 'No' the membership could inflict a short sharp shock that would probably have a far speedier and dramatic effect on the union as well as on the attitude of the leadership. Who could blame them?

If there were a 'No' vote then it would be a clear rejection of New Labour. The Left within the union would then have to campaign for a further political fund ballot with rules allowing a genuine democratic debate amongst the membership as to how the funds are spent.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.


In The Socialist 24 May 2003:

Striking Back At Poverty Pay

Amicus, The Political Fund And New Labour

NATFHE conference: Defend Education Fight New Labour's Attacks

Capitalism Means War And Terror

Education: New Labour's triple crisis

Fees - Tories try to woo students

Nursery Nurses scent victory in pay battle

Coventry Labour Prefers Deals With The Tories

Iraq: The Chaos Of Imperialist Occupation

Raffarin government attacks pensions France's Workers Take To The Streets


 

Home   |   The Socialist 24 May 2003   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate  




Related links:

Amicus:

triangleHeathrow: Why Furious Workers Walked Out

triangleAmicus: Good left vote

Labour:

triangleSave Salford nurseries!

triangleLabour councillors push through savage cuts in Kirklees budget

triangleBlairite mayor faces open election after democratic 'irregularities' - fight for a no-cuts mayor

triangleBuilding the campaign against clearances of the working class

Union:

triangleUnison national women's conference

triangleSupermarket's slash jobs - union fightback needed

triangleUniversity workers' walkout for decent pensions

Britain:

triangleCaerphilly & RCT Socialist Party: 100 years of votes for women

triangleYork Socialist Party: Britain in 2018

Reports and campaigns

Reports and campaigns

21/2/18

Strike

German engineering strike puts shorter week on agenda - but could have won more

21/2/18

Cardiff

Cardiff Refugee Rights gig success

21/2/18

Nottingham

Nottingham hospital black alert

21/2/18

East Midlands

Lively discussion at East Midlands Socialist Party conference

21/2/18

West Midlands

Tremendous determination on show at West Midlands conference

21/2/18

Wales

Successful Socialist Party Wales conference sets tone for the year ahead

21/2/18

Bradford

Bradford protests against kids' service cuts

21/2/18

May Day

May Day, May Day! Celebrate solidarity!

21/2/18

Kirklees

Labour councillors push through savage cuts in Kirklees budget

21/2/18

Salford

Save Salford nurseries!

21/2/18

Caerphilly

Victory: Pontllanfraith leisure centre saved

21/2/18

Council

Northants council crisis - protesters demand an end to cuts and privatisation

21/2/18

Leicester

Leicester Uni makes Tory fee tripler David Willetts chancellor - sack Willetts!

21/2/18

UCU

Bosses divided - university pension strikes can win!

21/2/18

Mansfield

Chatsworth ward victory shows we can save our NHS

triangleMore Reports and campaigns articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 0798 202 1969

East Mids: 0773 797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 0191 421 6230

North West 07769 611 320

South East: 020 8988 8777

South West: 07759 796 478

Southern: 07833 681910

Wales: 07935 391 947

West Mids: 02476 555 620

Yorkshire: 0114 264 6551

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


February 2018

January 2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999