The Socialist

The Socialist 24 March 2021

NHS crisis, mass sackings, violence against women... Protesting is not a crime

The Socialist issue 1126

Protesting is not a crime

Defying the anti-protest restrictions

Police attempt to silence mothers

Police invade student homes


NHS pay: 15% now

Fighting NHS privatisation

Haringey: Hands off our GP practices


Battle for a fighting, anti-austerity Liverpool mayor

Why I am standing for TUSC

Help fund the Socialist Party's stand as part of TUSC


Fighting sexual harassment and gender violence on campus

Justice for Blessing Olusegun

Film Review: Moxie


150th anniversary of the Paris Commune


Lessons of the 2011 pensions strike: when workers showed their power


PCS elections: increased support for Broad Left Network

Engineering workers strike against 'fire and rehire' in Leicester

'Sleep-ins' ruling must lead to a huge campaign for social care workers' rights

Shrewsbury Pickets win: Convictions overturned

Sparks continue protests against deskilling

Beal High school strike as management refuse to negotiate over fair sick pay scheme

Preparing to organise workers in Enfield

Support victimised bus driver reps and Socialist Party members Declan and Moe

Goodlord workers continue all-out strike


Save John Carroll - fight is far from over!

Stop evictions and drop the debts

Online meeting - Ending violence against women, the socialist approach

Socialist Party regional conferences meet online


The Socialist Inbox

 
 
 
 
 

PO Box 1398, Enfield EN1 9GT

020 8988 8777

[email protected]

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/1126/32223

Seach this siteSearch the site

Printable versionPrintable version

Facebook

Twitter

Home   |   The Socialist 24 March 2021   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Audio  |   PDF  |   ebook

Battle for a fighting, anti-austerity Liverpool mayor

British Gas engineers on strike in Liverpool , photo Neill Dunne

British Gas engineers on strike in Liverpool , photo Neill Dunne   (Click to enlarge)

Liverpool has a rich history of councillors being prepared to mobilise workers, take the fight to a Tory government, and win funding for the city. This was the case in the 1980s when, with the political leadership of Militant, now the Socialist Party, Liverpool defeated Thatcher and won 60 million.

Unfortunately, in the decades since, successive Labour council leaderships and mayors have continued to carry out austerity as instructed by the Tories, with 420 million of cuts in the last decade.

Now, after facing corruption allegations and arrest, Labour's ex-mayor Joe Anderson has stepped down. Determined to prevent a Corbyn-supporting mayoral candidate for Labour in May's elections, Keir Starmer's Labour machine has stepped in and interfered, removing the three candidates originally shortlisted. One of those removed, who has been supported by Corbyn and Unite the union nationally, Anna Rothery, has taken unsuccessful legal action against the Labour Party as a consequence. The courts charged her an outrageous 65,000 in costs.

Amid this turmoil, there have been press reports suggesting that government commissioners could be brought in to take over some of the council's functions. All the more reason for an anti-cuts mayor, backed up by councillors, willing to mobilise Liverpool workers to refuse to be dictated to by the Tories in a city with not a single Conservative councillor.

Socialist Party member and prospective mayoral candidate for the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition, Roger Bannister, has written to Anna Rothery.

We publish the letter here:

Dear Anna,

I am writing to you following your recent legal case, which unfortunately did not result in you being re-included on the Labour Party shortlist of candidates for the Labour nomination in the city's forthcoming mayoral election.

As you are aware, I intend to stand in the election as the candidate of the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC). My reason for doing this is to ensure that the electorate has the opportunity to vote for clear anti-austerity policies. For the same reason, TUSC will also be contesting council seats in Liverpool.

You have declared you are a supporter of Jeremy Corbyn, and oppose his continued exclusion from the Parliamentary Labour Party. In my view, your undemocratic exclusion from Labour's shortlist is part of the current Labour leadership's determination to drive Jeremy Corbyn's supporters, and his anti-austerity policies, from the Labour Party.

Many of the policies included in Jeremy Corbyn's 2019 general election manifesto could be implemented by an anti-austerity Liverpool mayor, backed by a team of anti-austerity councillors. To give just a few examples: it would be possible to ensure that any work undertaken by or for Labour councils is done by workers paid at least 10 an hour, to end the use of zero-hour contracts by Labour-led councils and by any company undertaking work for them, and to deliver a year-on-year above-inflation pay rise to begin to restore lost pay. It would also be possible to end outsourcing and return all outsourced and privatised services to council control, restoring them to an even better standard of service than before (see 'Could councils implement Labour's 2019 pledges?' at tusc.org.uk).

Of course, given the dire state of the city's finances, implementing these policies would need to be combined with a mass campaign, based on the trade unions and the working-class communities, to force the government to increase funding for the city.

There has also been some comment in the media, and amongst local Labour movement activists, that you may consider standing as a left independent candidate given the undemocratic manner in which the Labour Party has handled, and is handling, the selection process. I believe that this would be a positive step to take as far as socialist policies are concerned, and in particular for the working-class people of Liverpool. It would undoubtedly create a campaign for trade unionists and socialist activists to unite around, in a fight for fair treatment for Liverpool.

If you are thinking along those lines I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this further, if necessary on a confidential basis.

Yours sincerely

Roger Bannister


In this issue


Protest

Protesting is not a crime

Defying the anti-protest restrictions

Police attempt to silence mothers

Police invade student homes


NHS

NHS pay: 15% now

Fighting NHS privatisation

Haringey: Hands off our GP practices


Elections

Battle for a fighting, anti-austerity Liverpool mayor

Why I am standing for TUSC

Help fund the Socialist Party's stand as part of TUSC


Fighting Sexual Harassment

Fighting sexual harassment and gender violence on campus

Justice for Blessing Olusegun

Film Review: Moxie


Paris Commune 150 Years

150th anniversary of the Paris Commune


2011 Pensions Strike

Lessons of the 2011 pensions strike: when workers showed their power


Workplace News

PCS elections: increased support for Broad Left Network

Engineering workers strike against 'fire and rehire' in Leicester

'Sleep-ins' ruling must lead to a huge campaign for social care workers' rights

Shrewsbury Pickets win: Convictions overturned

Sparks continue protests against deskilling

Beal High school strike as management refuse to negotiate over fair sick pay scheme

Preparing to organise workers in Enfield

Support victimised bus driver reps and Socialist Party members Declan and Moe

Goodlord workers continue all-out strike


Campaigns

Save John Carroll - fight is far from over!

Stop evictions and drop the debts

Online meeting - Ending violence against women, the socialist approach

Socialist Party regional conferences meet online


Readers' Opinion

The Socialist Inbox


 

Home   |   The Socialist 24 March 2021   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Audio  |   PDF  |   ebook