Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Link to this page:

Posted on 11 February 2013 at 13:01 GMT

Film review

'No' - an exercise in rewriting Chile's history

Tony Saunois

It is 1988, Santiago, Chile, and 15 years into the vicious Pinochet dictatorship. The military regime has been compelled to call a plebiscite on the continuation of Pinochet's presidency. The choice on the ballot is a simple yes or no.

This is the setting for Chilean director Pablo Larrain's latest film 'No'. Released in 2012 it is the story of advertising PR man, Rene, a single parent played by Mexican actor Gael Garcia Bernal, who also played Che Guevara in the film 'Che'.

No has been nominated for Oscar awards and reviewed as a "must" to see "an account of Chile in the 1980s". It is presented as a "radical" film which is not a "typical political drama".

Technically the film skilfully intertwines original news footage from the time with its story. It opens with an effective listing of the crimes of the regime.

Scenes of Pinochet's advisory council meetings and footage from the Yes campaign depict a regime wholly out of touch with Chilean society - sometimes with humorous irony.

There are undoubtedly witty moments - eg when a government minister is unclear if the No campaign flag - a rainbow - is a gay symbol, a Mapuche [a group of indigenous inhabitants of Latin America] symbol or a gay Mapuche symbol.

Rewriting history

However, apart from some film footage of police repression, this film is an exercise in writing out of history the real heroes of the struggle against the regime.

It is part of a process in this period to try to rewrite history to denigrate or wipe out the role of mass struggle and especially the workers' movement from key historical events.

Sometimes, as in the case of No, this is then dressed in some form of radical dress to sell it to a new audience.

From the skewed perspective of a slick advertising TV campaign with its main slogan, "Happiness is coming to Chile", it appears the regime was defeated by the sole efforts of an advertising agent.

This was in truth the basis of the No campaign. It was an attempt by the leaders at the time to de-politicise the movement. The No vote won, in reality, despite its campaign not because of it.

Seeing the film tells nothing about the background to the plebiscite and the struggle against the regime.

Throughout the film there is not a single shot of life in the working class areas and the shanty towns which surrounded Santiago at the time and were the heartland of resistance to the military dictatorship.

The entire struggle is viewed through the distorted prism of the middle class advertising world.

Pressure from below

The regime was compelled to call the plebiscite as a result of the mass protests which erupted during the 1980s.

Tens of thousands took to the streets, building barricades and doing battle with the riot police and the army month after month.

In 1984 a massive demonstration of at least 250,000 took place on May Day in the O'Higgins park in Santiago.

Here the first issue of the paper of the Committee for a Workers' International (CWI, the world socialist organisation to which the Socialist Party is affiliated) 'Democracia Obrera' was sold by members of the CWI wearing masks to avoid detection by the hated secret police, the CNI.

A massive battle erupted at the end of the march as tens of thousands of heroic masked youth fought the army and police. There was overwhelming support among the youth for an armed uprising.

The Chilean Communist Party adopted a "double speak policy". It was compelled to reflect the mood of the youth and established its own armed wing - the PFMR.

Chile, by the end of the 1980s, was on the brink of an insurrection. Even El Mercurio, the right-wing daily which backed the coup in 1973, warned that Chile was heading for a "Nicaraguan road".

The Sandinista victory, which overthrew the brutal Samoza dictatorship in Nicaragua in 1979, had rekindled the idea of insurrectionary struggle among the young fighters battling against the repressive regimes of Latin America.

Communist Party betrayal

At the same time the Chilean Communist Party leadership conducted its real policy which was to join together with the 'democratic' capitalists and work for a controlled transition.

It was the mass movement and threat of an uprising which compelled the ruling class and then the regime to call the plebiscite.

The leaders of the Communist Party and the Socialist Party in alliance with the capitalist parties like the Christian Democracy supported the plebiscite as a means of channelling the mass opposition to the military into a 'safe', 'democratic' transition to avoid an uprising and what would have followed it.

None of this is even referred to in the film; It was all due to the efforts of Rene - a PR man.

The regime was convinced it would win the plebiscite but was preparing to fix the result in case it lost.

This is clearly portrayed in the film. As the results came in the power was cut - as it was in real life.

Yet suddenly the regime caved in and accepted the result. Why? The film does not attempt to answer this question beyond saying it was due to "international pressure". This had not bothered Pinochet for 15 years.

Archive material of air force chief of staff Matthei arriving at La Moneda presidential palace declaring he accepts the No campaign's victory is shown in the film.

The air force had supported a controlled transition for a period of time. Yet, why the change of heart by the army and navy?

As the power was cut, a struggle opened up within the regime. Pinochet wanted to fix the result. However, reflecting the mass pressure the army generals split and the game was up.

Outside the presidential palace were hundreds of thousands. Thousands of the best youth fighters had flooded to the city centre and were prepared to storm the presidential palace - among them members of the CWI Chilean section.

Struggle continues

These youth were dispersed and sent home by leaders of the Communist Party speaking from the tops of riot police vehicles.

They said the situation was "under control" and they would call them back should it be necessary. In reality, behind the scenes, agreement was being reached with the military and the opposition. Not a hint of this is reflected in No.

The film ends with the poignant archive film of Pinochet handing over power with a smile and shaking hands with Pratricio Alwyn, the newly elected president and member of the capitalist Christian Democracy which had backed the coup in 1973.

A 'controlled' transition to a wholly undemocratic system followed, in which Pinochet remained head of the army and senator for life.

It was written into law that the military would be immune from prosecution for its crimes of murder and torture.

The legacy of the "Happiness is coming to Chile" promise of the No campaign has been greater inequality and vicious neoliberal policies today.

A new generation has now taken up the struggle against these policies reflected in the tremendous student movement which has taken place during the last two years.

In 2012 mass protests demanded renationalisation of the copper industry and the country's other resources to pay for decent education, all privatised under Pinochet and not touched by successive governments.

'No' may raise awareness that Pinochet was defeated in a plebiscite. Will it enlighten people about the reality of what happened or what lessons can be drawn today? No.

For essential background reading see The other '9/11' - The 1973 bloody coup against Popular Unity government:

The other '9/11'

This version of this article was first posted on the Socialist Party website on 11 February 2013 and may vary slightly from the version subsequently printed in The Socialist.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.

Related links:


triangle1987 Zeebrugge disaster

triangleLeicester Socialist Party: Chile 1972 - Can there ever be a compromise with capitalism?

triangleBirmingham South East Socialist Party: Chile 1973 - A failed revolution

triangleChile: general strike threat as pensions protests grow


triangleRussia 1917: how art helped make the revolution

triangleGentrification, class and race in Brixton film

triangleNewham socialists attend 'I, Daniel Blake' film night

triangleHow black women fought racism and sexism at Nasa


triangleVictor Jara's revolutionary life, poetry and politics

triangleDictatorship's methods still reign in 'democratic' Chile

triangleA new chapter in Chile's political crisis

Reviews and comments

Reviews and comments



The Socialist inbox



'Ana Key MP' - Socialist artist responds to attacks



Crunchy guitar and poignant dialogue in alt-rock homage to south Wales miners



From Militant to the Socialist Party - what you thought



The Socialist inbox



School students' remarkable tribute to workers' Spanish Civil War bravery



Transport strategy: London's mayor is no visionary



200-year miscarriage of justice exposing ruling class


The Socialist

The Socialist inbox



From Militant to the Socialist Party - what you thought


Socialist Party

To join the struggle to save the NHS



From Militant to the Socialist Party - what you thought



The Socialist Inbox


Socialist Party

"Austerity hurts and the only alternative is socialism"



1980s Liverpool Militants replaced tower blocks with streets

triangleMore Reviews and comments articles...

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

triangle23 Aug The Single Market: a neoliberal tool of the bosses

Barts strikers, 15.7.17 demo, photo Paul Mattsson

triangle22 Aug Coordinate the strikes to defeat the Tories

triangle21 Aug The role of the RMT in changing Labour

triangle21 Aug Bin workers say: Sack Suez, stop rubbish cuts!

triangle17 Aug Bin workers - fighting back wins!

triangle17 Aug Vital women's services under threat

triangle15 Aug US: neo-Nazi violence reawakens resistance

More ...

triangle23 Aug Salford Socialist Party: Why Marxism opposes terrorism

triangle23 Aug Hackney Socialist Party: Northern Ireland - the DUP deal and Brexit

triangle23 Aug South-East London Socialist Party: USA - The fight against Trump and the struggle for a socialist alternative

triangle24 Aug Waltham Forest Socialist Party: How can workers win decent pay?

More ...

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube



August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017





















Platform setting: = No platform choice