News

Home

Join us

Darling's prescription... It's spend, spend, spend on the banks... but cuts, cuts, cuts for the NHS

Manchester: No redundancies at IMI!

Campaigning to save post offices

'We're not taking these job cuts'

U-turn over post office card account

Drop the witch-hunt in Unison fight to Defend trade union democracy

Student democracy under attack

'Students in the Red' day of action

Prescott: the class system and me

Striking against low pay

Worlds apart... in 'them and us' society

Postal workers march for their jobs

Defeat NUS' undemocratic plans

'Why not save our jobs?'

NHS props up the private profiteers

Search...

Policies...

Marxism...

 

Socialist Party logo Socialist Party on the climate change demo December 2007, pic Paul Mattsson Socialist Party News
Socialist Party Policy statements
Socialist Party contemporary Marxist analysis

Link to this page: http://www.socialistparty.org.uk/issue/541/6269

Print this articlePrint this article

email to friendemail to friend

Seach this siteGoogle search the site

Home   |   The Socialist 9 July 2008   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Bookshop

On the other side of the financial divide...

LAST THURSDAY, MPs voted by a majority of 28 to retain their additional costs allowance (£24,000 expenses for their second homes); the notorious 'John Lewis list' of furnishings for their second homes (so-called because it is based on prices at the department store); and to have their spending looked at only by internal, rather than external, auditors.

Dave Carr

Not content with 'earning' £67,000 a year, a backbench MP also claims, on average, £135,000 in allowances.

So, despite all the recent public anger over MPs feather-bedding themselves with outrageous expense claims, they voted to retain their privileges. This is at a time when prime minister Gordon Brown and chancellor Alistair Darling are imposing below-inflation wage settlements, ie pay cuts, on millions of public-sector workers.

To add insult to injury, MPs under the additional costs allowance can have their utility bills paid, while millions on low incomes struggle to meet soaring electricity, gas, water and council tax bills.

The only concessions MPs agreed, is to declare if employing relatives and, having to submit receipts on all items worth more than £25 - previously they could claim up to £250 without providing a receipt. They also will now have their expenses claims published.

Earlier this year the Freedom of Information tribunal ruled that MPs make full disclosures of their additional costs allowance. But the House of Commons Speaker, Michel Martin, went to the high court (spending £200,000 of public money) to block its release, only to lose.

The furore over MPs' expenses erupted in January this year after the Conservative MP Derek Conway was censured for paying £260,000 to members of his own family despite no evidence of any work being conducted.

In another publicised case two Tory MPs, Ann and Nicholas Winterton, claimed £165,000 in Commons expenses for their £700,000 second home in London six years after they paid off the mortgage. They claimed this 'rent' and put it into a family trust for their two children, also ensuring a sizeable reduction in their children's inheritance tax.

These scandals were only the tip of a large expenses iceberg when details of MPs' 'John Lewis' list of expense claims were revealed.

Because of these high-profile cases Tory leader David Cameron got his shadow cabinet to vote to scrap the John Lewis list - safe in the knowledge that a majority of MPs would vote to retain it. Gordon Brown attempted to sidestep the issue by absenting himself from parliament.

Labour MPs are also embroiled in expenses scandals. Husband and wife cabinet ministers, Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper, are under investigation by the parliamentary standards watchdog over their use of the second homes allowance.


Gangsters' wages

Last week The Socialist reported the death of former firefighter, Militant supporter and Liverpool Labour MP, Terry Fields. Along with the late Pat Wall and the current Coventry Socialist Party councillor, Dave Nellist, Terry, as an MP, only accepted the average workers' wage and the necessary expenses to do his job. Everything else was donated back to the labour and trade union cause.

What a contrast to today's MPs, who voted to keep their perks, including Peter Kilfoyle, Neil Kinnock's witchfinder-general, sent in to expel Terry and other good socialists from the Labour Party.

But, what has changed? After Terry was elected to parliament in 1983 he told his Fire Brigades Union comrades: "See the wages those gangsters down there are on!"


Also in The Socialist 9 July 2008:

Striking back against low pay


Campaign for a New Workers Party

The working class needs its own party

CNWP conference: Wanted - a new mass workers' party


Socialist Party news and analysis

UK economy sliding into recession

Rich get richer: Why should we pay the price!

MP backs student fees campaign

Bonuses for chiefs, pay restraint for civil service workers

Government lies on public-sector pay

High farce from Boris Johnson

G8 leaders' 'world hunger' banquet

On the other side of the financial divide...


Socialist Party NHS campaign

Defend the NHS!

Property deals threaten private nursing homes

Cancer vaccines: who decides?


Marxist analysis: history

Terry Fields: A socialist voice that rocked Whitehall


Socialist Party LGBT

Marching against homophobia & racism


Socialist Party workplace news

Argos warehouse workers vote to strike

DWP strikes bring talks

National Shop Stewards Network Conference: Organising migrant workers

A day in the life of a call centre worker

Call centre charter: A framework for workers' rights

RMT conference discusses crisis of political representation

Socialist stands for Usdaw general secretary


 

Home   |   The Socialist 9 July 2008   |   Join the Socialist Party

Subscribe   |   Donate   |   Bookshop

Related links:

MPs:

Panicky MPs turn on Labour

Government lies on public-sector pay

MPs' expensive expenses

Editorial: Brown's government lurching from pillar to post

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill: why all the controversy?