Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

Socialist Case for Exit

Link to this page: https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/26941

Posted on 26 February 2018 at 11:57 GMT

Editorial of the March 2018 issue of Socialism Today

Socialism Today, March 2018

Socialism Today, March 2018

Tory Brexit divisions, Corbyn's opportunity

The Socialist Party, publishers of Socialism Today, campaigned for a Leave vote in the June 2016 EU referendum.

The European Union is a bosses' club, at bottom an institutionalisation of a series of treaties agreed between the capitalist classes of the different member states.

Socialists, and the working-class movement as a whole, should never offer one ounce of support to the capitalists' rule of society, in general and in particulars.

Even if there had been no other considerations involved, given the binary choice presented in the referendum, the Socialist Party would have refused to give a vote of confidence to the capitalist EU.

But we also supported a Leave vote in 2016 because of the impact we predicted it would have on the Tory Party.

We pointed out in advance that a Leave victory would unseat David Cameron, as it did within hours. We argued it would push the Tories ever closer to a split, similar to the 19th century schisms over the Corn Laws and Tariff Reform, opening the way for a Jeremy Corbyn-led government.

That perspective was mocked at the time by many on the left. Just before the poll, the Guardian columnist Paul Mason, for example, scoffed at those "fantasising that if Leave wins Cameron will fall". (21 June 2016) Now the fragmentation of the Tory Party and the prospect of sweeping political realignments is the new accepted wisdom.

This situation creates opportunities but also, with the Blairite fifth column within the Labour Party on Brexit manoeuvres, dangers too.

The need for the workers' movement to have an independent class position on the EU and a socialist, internationalist programme has never been greater.

Politics and economics

The EU is a bosses' club and the Tories are the oldest bosses' party in the world. So why are they facing potential existential divisions over Brexit?

No individual business executive, police chief, judge, journalist or state official is directly and immediately representative of capitalism as a whole, however much they defend it.

Capitalist politicians too, needing to ideologically justify a system based on the exploitation of the majority by a small minority, can also adopt positions against its overall interests in order to nurture a social base.

When Jacob Rees-Mogg spoke at the House of Commons Brexit select committee earlier this year against a 'transition arrangement' with the EU - saying it would turn Britain into a "vassal state" - his audience was the 100,000 or so Tory Party members, not the broad majority of Britain's ruling class.

Yet Rees-Mogg and his European Research Group of Tory MPs, with its own WhatsApp group parliamentary whip, are in a pivotal position.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in The Communist Manifesto famously described capitalist governments, "the executive of the modern state", as committees "for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie".

Particularly in times of economic growth, conflicting material interests and ideological stances can be smoothed over. But sometimes the contradictions are too acute. That is the position the Tory government finds itself in today.

It is trying to deal with the most profound change in British capitalism's international relations since 1945 against the backdrop of a world economy and political firmament still shaped by the financial crash of 2007-08 (see the article by Judy Beishon, Ten Years Since the Crash, on page ten).

The Tories' unfolding implosion was excruciatingly illustrated in the contortions last month on the issue of a post-Brexit customs union with the EU.

Speaking during her China visit Theresa May initially refused to rule this out. The home secretary, Amber Rudd, a Remainer in the referendum, then said on the Andrew Marr show that it was a possibility.

Literally minutes later, the housing minister Dominic Raab, a 2016 Brexiteer, openly contradicted her. No.10 was then forced to issue a statement denying it was policy to be in "the customs union" or even "a customs union" - but not saying what the policy was.

No wonder the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC), representing 75,000 firms, issued an Open Letter to the Prime Minister pleading for "those elected to govern to make choices", to provide "answers to the many practical questions businesses now face"!

The BCC's anguish reflects a growing fear among the British ruling class as Brexit day looms. The EU's free trade deals with 53 countries cannot be simply inherited - not least because they will want to know what Britain's future trade relations with the EU will be.

The tariff, quota, trade preferences and subsidy rules lodged with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) by the EU also cannot be simply transferred to Britain which, after it has divided them up with its EU ex-partners - not necessarily amicably - will then need to get them approved by all the 163 other WTO members.

And tariffs are less significant than non-tariff barriers, such as regulations, especially for services which make up 80% of the British economy.

Financial and ancillary services, for example, which depend on 'passporting' rights under the EU single market to conduct business across the 28 member states, employ 730,000 people.

Roughly 7% of global foreign direct investment, some 1 trillion involving 500 multinationals, has been made in Britain predicated on its participation in the customs union and the 500 million-consumer EU single market.

On a capitalist basis the 'economically logical' position would clearly be for a 'soft Brexit' or Bino, Brexit in name only.

But it is not even guaranteed that there will not be a 'no deal' crash-out exit. Capitalism is a system of political economy, not economics alone.

Corbyn's opportunity

The workers' movement must maintain an independent class opposition to a Tory Brexit, 'soft', 'hard' or 'no deal'. But that is not the position of the Blairite defenders of capitalism within the Labour Party.

The Guardian journalist Martin Kettle reported the fury of right-wing Labour MPs at Jeremy Corbyn's statement at the start of 2018 that Britain could not remain in the single market. "But Corbyn's remark might not be as portentous as that suggests", he advised them (12 January). "The real issue is the future relationship with the single market, the customs union and other European regulatory agencies and enforcement systems", and Labour's position is still to be agreed.

The right-wing Labour shadow Brexit secretary Keir Starmer has made the same point. "What underpins access to the single market and customs union is a level playing field", he said in an Andrew Marr interview. (The Guardian, 11 December 2017) "You have to stay on the same level playing field. The Labour Party doesn't have a problem with that".

Which Labour Party? The EU 'playing field', for example, requires public procurement contracts - a 240 billion annual spend in Britain - to be put out to competitive tender to firms across the EU if they are worth over 120,000.

Jeremy Corbyn, calling for an end to the 'outsourcing racket' after the collapse of Carillion, rightly pointed out that single market rules would "potentially make it harder" to do so.

That approach needs to be generalised. The most important 'Brexit policy' Jeremy Corbyn could adopt now would be to declare that a government he leads would take whatever decisive socialist measures are necessary in defence of the working class regardless of EU treaty provisions and regulations.

The majority of EU regulations - on standardisation, consumer protection, environmental safeguards, workplace rights and so on - are unobjectionable.

However, those that would create distracting legal obstacles - the state aid rules, procurement laws, the posted workers' directive, etc - should be declared null and void.

That holds even though they could not stop a Corbyn-led government supported by a mass movement from carrying out socialist policies.

A bold stand by Jeremy Corbyn against the anti-working class treaties and policies of the EU could electrify the debate across Europe.

A call to scrap the austerity-driving European Fiscal Compact, write-off the eurozone debts, and to create a 'level field' based on public ownership of the banks and major monopolies in each EU country, could mobilise workers continent-wide and prepare for a new collaboration of the peoples of Europe on a socialist basis.

The Tories' Brexit trauma, which will only deepen in the weeks and months ahead, is creating new opportunities for working-class politics.

The first step is a clear programme for a socialist and internationalist break with the EU bosses' club.

Why not click here to join the Socialist Party, or click here to donate to the Socialist Party.






Related links:

EU:

triangleThe fog of Brexit

triangleTUC congress Brexit debate: unions must lead fight for a general election

triangleThem & Us

triangleTheresa May's 'Chequers deal' mauled by Johnson and EU

triangleGDPR data laws: Punishing workers for human mistakes

Brexit:

triangleTories in chaos - general election now!

triangleWaltham Forest Socialist Party: Brexit - the socialist viewpoint

triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: European Union - Its purpose & fate

triangleWirral Socialist Party: What we mean by a "workers' Brexit"

Labour:

triangleThe Socialist inbox

triangleMomentum's 'The World Transformed' blocks discussion on Liverpool council struggle

triangleThe struggle to transform Labour

Britain:

triangleBosses' pay up a fifth while workers' pay falls ...

triangleNo to Tory plans for radioactive waste under national parks

Jeremy Corbyn:

triangleBlairites must go

Europe:

triangleThe ongoing capitalist crisis and the struggle for a socialist world

British economy:

triangleAmber warning lights flash on British economy

News and socialist analysis

News and socialist analysis

19/9/18

Labour Party

Blairites must go

19/9/18

Student

Mobilise mass student fightback

19/9/18

Housing

250,000 families in "non-decent" homes

19/9/18

EU

The fog of Brexit

19/9/18

What we saw

What we saw

19/9/18

Rail

Rail rip-off reversal

19/9/18

Momentum

Momentum's 'The World Transformed' blocks discussion on Liverpool council struggle

19/9/18

Labour Party

The struggle to transform Labour

18/9/18

Drug companies

Big drugs companies dodge 3 billion pounds in tax

13/9/18

PCS

PCS: the real issues at stake - a reply to Socialist View

12/9/18

Labour Party

Corbyn must lead in fight against the Blairites

12/9/18

Capitalism

Fearful bosses call for 'fairer capitalism'...

12/9/18

Food

4m children in homes that can't afford fruit and veg

12/9/18

Them & Us

Them & Us

12/9/18

Academies

School students in solitary: for full funding, not exclusion!

triangleMore News and socialist analysis articles...


Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

LATEST POSTS

CONTACT US

Phone our national office on 020 8988 8777

Email: info@socialistparty.org.uk

Locate your nearest Socialist Party branch Text your name and postcode to 07761 818 206

Regional Socialist Party organisers:

Eastern: 0798 202 1969

East Mids: 0773 797 8057

London: 020 8988 8786

North East: 0784 114 4890

North West 07769 611 320

South East: 020 8988 8777

South West: 07759 796 478

Southern: 07833 681910

Wales: 07935 391 947

West Mids: 02476 555 620

Yorkshire: 0114 264 6551

ABOUT US

ARCHIVE

Alphabetical listing


September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

June 2018

May 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999